‘Distance Education’ Category Archives

22
Aug

TWITTER!!!!!

by Cathy in Distance Education, Education, Education Technology, Uncategorized, Web 2.0, connectivism, web2.0 facebook twitter

It’s human nature perhaps to start taking things for granted, not dig below the surface and really start to understand how we can really use things to our advantage..such is the case for Twitter.  I tweet..lots of  things that interest me and I hope interest others.  I also tweet things I do ..particularly in Second Life but other areas of my life too.   I will probably tweet this blog too.

“Tweeting” is a form of microbloggin which is defined by Grosseck and Holutescu, (retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/2286799/Can-we-use-Twitter-for-educational-activities) as a Web2.0 technology, and a new form of blogging that let the users publish online brief text updates, usually less then 140-200 characters, sometimes images too.

Wikipedia provides the following defnition of microblogging:  is a passive broadcast medium in the form of blogging. A microblog differs from a traditional blog in that its content is typically much smaller, in both actual size and aggregate file size. A microblog entry could consist of nothing but a short sentence fragment, an image or embedded video.

As with traditional blogging, microbloggers post about topics ranging from the simple, such as “what I’m doing right now,” to the thematic, such as “sports cars.” Commercial microblogs also exist, to promote websites, services and/or products, and to promote collaboration within an organisation.

I have been tweeting religiously for over a year now and plan to do so for at least another six months or for as long as I believe Twitter serves a purpose for me professionally and personally. Twitter has served as the means through which I have created an online persona and identity and I feel it has served that purpose very well.

As I am going to continue to maintain this blog with a focus on certain tools that i use and I have applied the use of Twitter it seemed the logical choice for this posting.  Given that I decided to do some background research to see how others are applying the use of Twitter as educators and perhaps even contrast or compare that to how I use Twitter for information sharing.

My search brought up the blog of Alan Lew, dated 2007. So I checked on Alan to see if he was still using Twitter and he is, in fact, still communicating via Twitter.

I have summarized Alan’s suggestions for using Twitter:

1.  Communicating with students regarding homework, content, and summarizing meetings and conferences.
2.  Communication via a mobile phone
3.  Digital Reference services

Moving on in my search I next found Carol Cooper-Taylor’s 2008 blog with 50 ideas on using twitter.    I reviewed her blog and summarize her observations here:

Sharing links, be human, respond to others, highlight student activities, communicate with and encourage others in your institution to use Twitter to communicate, tweet in moderation, use twitter for instant meet ups, use twitter for facilitating a “backchannel” discussion in the classroom, and bring great minds together!

Ron Jones, in September of 2008, published the following in SearchEngine Watch magazine:

Using twitter to increase the discussion outside the classroom regarding the subject taught..(issue of the day/week?)
Other:  Instant feedback.

  • Track a conference or seminar.
  • Follow a professional or famous person.
  • Public notepad.
  • Writing assignments.
  • Grammar.
  • Maximizing the teachable moment.

The following researchers; Kerstin Borau Carsten Ullrich, Jinjin Feng, and Ruimin Shen, detail how twitter can be used in language learning to faciliate learning English.    In their article they noted that.. “ twitter was selected because it provides the Chinese students the opportunity to
practice the target language as well as their communicative and cultural competence.”

They identify microblogging as tools (that)  enable users to post short messages that are distributed within their community. Users can post messages from their mobile devices, a Web page, from Instant Messengers and desktop clients. The same channels are used for receiving messages.

They found the following three advantages of using Twitter in their classroom :

  • First, Twitter is easily accessibly from almost everywhere, so the students can practice at any time by sending and receiving messages either on the computer or the mobile phone. They can also decide how much time they spend reading and writing these messages. This is an essential feature for busy students.
  • Second, Twitter is suitable for any level of English because in writing the messages, the students can chose a topic and grammatical structure fitting their level.
  • Third, the use of Twitter as an online learning community can help to integrate students in the community who could not attend classroom.

In my research for this blog I found this wiki on Twitter… Twitter Fan Wiki. Which provides a warehouse for a variety of uses of Twitter and how to use Twitter.

In this  2007 article by Tseng, Song, Java and Finin the term microblogging is defined as  a new form of communication in which users can describe their current status in short posts distributed by instant messages, mobile phones, email or the Web.

In the August 16, 2010 US New and Report article the following uses of Twitter were identified:

1.      Using Twitter to post and answer questions during a lecture.
2.    Build networks in the professional world

3.    Develop marketing plans for businesses as a class project.

4.    Tweeting during commencement graduation and other events

5.    A way of connecting with other students in spite of off campus obligations

6.    A way of faculty connecting with other faculty on best practices in teaching

7.    “Digital faculty lounge” for connecting with other faculty

Together we are are just better, we learn from each other and we can bounce ideas off each other, as pointed out in Laura Walker’s 2009 blog on twitter.   This process allows users to reflect upon and improve their practice in the classroom.    Twitter can, and does for me at least, serve as my newspaper and new alert feed.  I check updates on my Twitter stream daily, this is how I learned of the Gulf Oil Spill and other national events.

Academ Hack’s blog from January 23rd, 2008 identifies the following academic uses for Twitter:

Facilitating classroom chatter that may or may not be subject related,  creating a sense of classroom community, understanding the global community, tracking a word, tracking a conference, following a professional, teaching grammar, rule based writing, maximizing a teachable moment, public notepad and writing assignments.

The online daily mewsmagaizine, Inside Higher Ed, has published 73 articles, blogs, etc., on Twitter, the most recent on August 19,2010, which relates to cell phone use.   This article presents a new initiative in which a university provided the following:

Georgia Gwinnett College employed when it decided to offer its more than 300 full- and part-time faculty members cell phones and encouraged them to respond to any calls or texts from students within 24 hours
Is this not great or what?  Gwinnett is taking a great leap off the cliff into the future ….hopefully not an initiative ahead of it’s time !!  I am including this here because Microblogging and smart phones go hand in hand!

On July 26, 2010 Business Week published an article on MBA schools and Twitter. With increased use of Twitter and Facebook schools are adding courses on Social Media at a record pace.    Twitter is being used by many companies for marketing, and special offers, one of my favorites to follow is Dell.

As I was doing research for this blog I came across Rachel Rueben’s The Use of Social Media in Higher Education for Marketing and Communications: A Guide for Professionals in Higher
Education at the following link: http://files.meetup.com/1491352/social-media-in-higher-education.pdf

In her guide she conveys that higher education is using Twitter as follows:

Of the 42 responders reporting to have an official Twitter account for their college, 50% of them say it is updated by their marketing/communications/public relations office. 50% use it to communicate with current students, and the other half use it to reach out to alumni. The majority update their status 1-4 times/week.

On May 20,2010, Hend Suliman Al-Khalifa, conveyed the following uses of Twitter in an eLearn Feature Article. (the results are based upon a Faculty Focus survey of 1900 academics)

  • collaboration (between colleagues, in group meetings)
  • communication
    • between teacher and student, student and student, teacher and parents
    • as a conference backchannel
    • for job posting
    • to circulate department news
  • tools
    • as a personal learning environment/personal learning network
    • as a virtual office
    • to post assignments
    • for language learning
    • for class participation
    • to track attendance
    • to stay abreast of current issues in a given field

In May of 2010 Pearson released the details of their survey on the use of Social Media in education and the findings are as follows:

  • Most faculty respondents (59%) have more than one social network account; nearly 25 percent have accounts on four or more social networks.

More findings can be found on the Pearson website. An article in the May 4,  2010 of Inside Higher Education summarizes the findings of this survey.   In a nutshell though we can speculate that professors and students are not quite the luddites that they appear to be, that there is a purpose for  twitter and other social networking tools in the classroom and in higher education.

The articles notes that:   In the open-ended portions of the survey, a substantial number of professors said they do not currently use social media tools but expect they will in the near future — meaning that by next year, the rate of usage will probably be even higher…. What this means to me is that if the utility of tools such as Twitter provide a convenience in communicating with students, assist them to meet the learning outcomes, and connecting with the faculty it will be implemented!  If Twitter provides a means of effectively conducting administrative tasks such as keeping attendance it will be effectively applied by faculty and used by students.

  • Share/Bookmark
16
May

The many faces of “openness”

by Cathy in Distance Education, Education, Open Courseware, Open Education Resources, Uncategorized, collaboration

Open Education Resources, Open Knowledge, Open Textbooks, Open Access, Open Source, Open Courseware,  these are all terms that define the revolution in how we access information, who has access, and what we access.  This revolution was driving by the technology that underpins the Internet and provides ubiquitous access to the world’s knowledge, information and resources.

I have spent that last couple of months discovering reports, websites, and journals that focus on “open” in the area of knowledge, education and information.  It was no surprise to me when the New Media Consortium cited Open Courseware as a short term trend in their 2010 Horizons report.   I have written about openness in previous blogs so I hope this posting does not prove redundant.

The history of providing information and access to information to the people has been well chronicled from the printing press forward.  Providing access to university course materials, academic lectures, learning objects and public domain materials via the web is, in my opinion another key milestone in our history.  The benefit is that giving the gift of knowledge to the world will allow for improvement in our lives, work and the world.  The mind of many is greater than the mind of one as other review, discuss and build upon our knowledge.

Providing access to courses via the MITs, Yale, Princeton, and others provides us all with a better perspective of what is excellent teaching, access to their courses to adopt (with proper credit of course) to improve ours. Access to this courseware has contributed to online institutions such as the University of the People and Peer to Peer University.

The purpose of open”ness” is not to give away the “work” of creating the open resources, but to provide open access to the knowledge base that is foundational to the creation of resources that improve learning, knowledge, and data. The analytical process of reviewing, synthesizing and presenting for discussion the work should not be free and should in some fashion be compensated by individuals and/or institutions.

Some of the reports, papers and research on open courseware I have found include:

  • New Media Consortium 2010 Horizon Report
  • Open Learn Research Report 2006-2008 William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
  • Giving Knowledge for Free–Centre for Research and Innovation
  • Open Educational Resources–Conversations in Cyberspace–Unesco
  • International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning
  • Open Educational Resources in Sub Sahara Africa–Examining Network Driven Models within the context of African Development
  • Open Educational Practice and resources –OLCOS Roadmap 2012
  • A Review of the Open Educational Resources Movement:   Achievement Challenges and New Opportunities February 2007
  • Good Intentions Improving the evidence base in support of sharing learning materials
  • Open Access in France. A State of the Art Report. 2010 report
  • Report of the Working Group on Open Access and Open Educational Resources

Each of the “open” terms I listed above have varying definitions some of these are as follows:

Open Access is concerned with making digital content available free of charge
without restriction [Public Library of Science, 2006]

OAI is a new paradigm in scholarly publishing. It aims to promote models that ensure free and unrestricted access to scholarly & research journals, (retrieved from http://www.openj-gate.com/Footer/About.aspx)

Another offshoot of the openness movement is Open Knowledge: any content, information or data that people are free to use, re-use and redistribute — without any legal, technological or social restriction. We detail exactly what openness entails in the Open Knowledge Definition. The main principles are:

  1. Free and open access to the material
  2. Freedom to redistribute the material
  3. Freedom to reuse the material
  4. No restriction of the above based on who someone is (e.g. their nationality) or their field of endeavour (e.g. commercial or non-commercial)

Open education resources:  can be defined as free and open digital publications of high quality materials organized as courses that include lectures, related reading materials, snapshots of discussions, assignments, evaluations, etc. Access to these resources radically breaks down the barriers to quality education and allows everyone to access course material that is prepared and evaluated by expert.  (retrieved from http://www.knowledgecommission.gov.in/downloads/documents/wg_open_course.pdf)

Open Source:describes practices in production and development that promote access to the end product’s source materials. Some consider open source a philosophy, others consider it a pragmatic methodology. Subsequently, a new, three-word phrase “open source software” was born to describe the environment that the new copyright, licensing, domain, and consumer issues created.

Southern Europe Open Access to Science Information

Journals:

Directory of Open Access Journals We define open access journals as journals that use a funding model that does not charge readers or their institutions for access. From the BOAI definition [1] of “open access” we take the right of users to “read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles” as mandatory for a journal to be included in the directory.

Revues.org is a portal of journals in the humanities and social open to journals wishing to publish online the full text. Revues.org is a complete e-publishing platform and built a space dedicated to the promotion of research, open access publishing tens of thousands of scientific papers.

Open J Gate:  is an electronic gateway to global journal literature in open access domain. Launched in 2006, Open J-Gate is the contribution of Informatics (India) Ltd to promote OAI. Open J-Gate provides seamless access to millions of journal articles available online. Open J-Gate is also a database of journal literature, indexed from 6787 open access journals, with links to full text at Publisher sites.

The Open Education Journal is an Open Access online journal which publishes original research articles, reviews and short articles in all areas of education research and on contemporary education issues and learning, including special education.

I will not attempt to enumerate the many institutions which offer opencourseware. There are many sites which do this much better than I could.  For example the blogThe .Edu Toolbox aims to be your one stop tool shop for all the resources you need to create the blueprint and build an impressive foundation in learning.

The OpenCourseWare Consortium is a free and open digital publication of high quality educational materials, organized as courses. The OpenCourseWare Consortium is a collaboration of more than 200 higher education institutions and associated organizations from around the world creating a broad and deep body of open educational content using a shared model.

Connexions is: a place to view and share educational material made of small knowledge chunks called modules that can be organized as courses, books, reports, etc. Anyone may view or contribute:

  • authors create and collaborate
  • instructors rapidly build and share custom collections
  • learners find and explore content

The International Institute of Managment IIM;

The IIM Open Courseware (OCW) experiment project provides free access to some of IIM’s most popular educational materials.  The IIM’s OCW:

  • Does not require that participants register
  • Does not provide access to IIM faculty
  • Does not grant degrees or certificates
  • Allow free use to all, as long as you provide copyright reference to “International Institute of Management www.iim-edu.org ” with and active hyperlink (for online use)

Of course there are those colleges and universities known for providing opencourseware such as MIT, Yale, Tufts, John Hopkins, as well as companies such as Novell.

Over the last several years the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation have invested heavily in Open Educational Resources.  They stated that their intent was to catalyze universal access to and use of high-quality academic content on a global scale.

Lori Goetsh wrote in March 2010 that “open-access” repositories – that is,  (are) sites where scholarship and research are made freely available over the Internet. She went on to state that, “Open access helps achieve the fundamental mission of the academy – to disseminate knowledge…” (Goetsch, 2010, Change Magazine).

Is “openness” a disruptive innovation as put forth by Terry Anderson and Bridgette McConkey in the 2009 article Development of Disruptive Open Access Journals in The Canadian Journal of Higher Education.  Essentially the answer to that is yes.  Providing prevalent access to learning objects, course materials, and an understanding of how courses are designed (making education open and not a closed process).   Opening scholarly journals provides the authors with widespread access to their research allowing for a diverse review of their work, increased collaboration and further opportunities for collaborative research.  All of this allows for further innovations, innovations which will improve how we live, what we know, and how we work together…used appropriately ‘openness” and transparency improves our world, our lives, and the lives of future generations.

  • Share/Bookmark
6
May

Mulling over the elements of quality in online education

by Cathy in Distance Education, Education, Education Technology, online learning

Anyone who has taught or managed an online program or taken an online class has their own definition of what quality is in online education.  Because I have taken on line courses, managed an online program, and been a student in online courses I have defined some of my own conclusions on what are the essential elements of quality in an online program.

Some quality elements are obvious others are not and are even less than tangible and may not pay off until the student successfully completes his/her program of study.   In this presentation I have identified such things as assessment, engagement, interaction, time on task, and learning outcomes among others.

What follows are those elements that I have identified as essential to the quality of an online course or program. One essential element is the ease of access to the course, the content and the service and support for the course that are required for student success.   The course is designed or structured in such a way that engagement by the student with the content, the instructor and other students is facilitated and supported.

In addition to these elements the student is encouraged to provide insight by investigating external content and materials, fully utilizing the technology, seeking out student support services and library resources, and engaging with the institution.

The course provides an opportunity for the student to:

  • Think critically
  • Expand his/her knowledge by reviewing and demonstrating knowledge of the internal content and accessing appropriate external content
  • Stretch his/her ability  to learn in a variety of ways
  • Collaborate, connect with and network with a diverse group of learners

The learning is tested if possible via authentic assessment.  Authentic assessment is a form of assessment in which students are asked to perform real-world tasks that demonstrate meaningful application of essential knowledge and skills — Jon Mueller

Authentic assessment presents students with real-world challenges that require them to apply their relevant skills and knowledge. (retrieved from http://www.funderstanding.com/content/authentic-assessment 5/6/2010)

Authentic assessment is an evaluation process that involves multiple forms of performance measurement reflecting the student’s learning, achievement, motivation, and attitudes on instructionally-relevant activities. Examples of authentic assessment techniques include performance assessment, portfolios, and self-assessment.” American Library Association

Feedback is consistent with the student able to monitor his / her progress.  Feedback may also come from peers and peer review.

An online course should be designed in such a way that it encourages academic integrity.  Facutly can model ethics and integrity as well present core values which are the fundamental tenets of core values.

The course design and the hallmark of the course includes a design which facilitates the relationship between faculty and students and allows for the student to have access to the faculty if needed.

The course provides for a method of communication in which the student can engage in a dialogue with the faculty regarding issues and concerns regarding academic progress.

The student has access to tutors and other student support services in order to sufficiently learn the materials confidently and be successful.

The course is designed in such a way that expectations and outcomes are clear.    The learning outcomes are based upon a taxonomy such as Blooms which integrates the three domains:

  • Cognitive: mental skills (Knowledge)
  • Affective: growth in feelings or emotional areas (Attitude)
  • Psychomotor: manual or physical skills (Skills)

Each domain is divided into categories  and it is these catogories that provide the fundamental definition of the learning outcomes:

Cognitive:

  • Knowledge
  • Comprehension:
  • Application:
  • Analysis:
  • Synthesis:
  • Evaluation
  • personal values/opinions,

Affective:

Domain Attributes: interpersonal relations, emotions, attitudes, appreciations, and values id

accepts attempts challenges defends disputes joins judges
contributes praises questions shares supports volunteers

(retrieved from : http://eduscapes.com/tap/topic69.htm  5/6/2010)

Content is linked to activities and support the student learning the materials necessary to successfully achieve the stated outcomes.

Learning outcomes are clearly stated and are linked to the purpose of the course.  The required course purpose is clearly linked to the outcomes of the course.

The content of the course is current and meets industry and professional standards.  Resources are creative, innovative and dynamic.

Faculty demonstrate competency  and comfort with the use of technology in distance education for ease in communication, accessing content and course materials and connect with the student at all levels.   Student also demonstrate competency in the use of technology, have access to technical support and have several methods and points of contact with the institution, of communicating with each other, and faculty

Faculty presence in the course is demonstrated by feedback in a timely manner.

Faculty engagement with course content and with students occurs daily in the first two weeks of the semester.

A definition of “at risk students for dropping out” exists and those students receive additional support.

Faculty are trained in instructional design, the use of the learning management system and other technology,  and have received instructional design support.

The Learning Management System provides a structure or framework for course management, the appropriate delivery of content, grading, communication and assessment. The LMS is flexible enough to provide a platform for creativity and innovation by faculty and opportunities for students to be self directed in their learning and to create a personal learning network.

The course lends itself to individual and group self reflection activities.  The course, if applicable, builds on knowledge that student already has developed, encourages the student to provide input on projects, discussions and activities.  In other words new learning, and new knowledge is developed upon an existing foundation of knowledge.

To ensure quality and continuous quality improvement courses should be reviewed, by peers and external reviewers on a periodic basis.  These reviews should be conducted based upon the elements of an objective rubric designed to survey the essential elements of the course such as use of technology, feedback, communication, and interaction.


  • Share/Bookmark
26
Mar

Reports, plans, educational technology, broadband, millenials an interesting mix

by Cathy in Distance Education, Education, Education Technology, Future, Higher Education, Uncategorized, University, online learning

Several reports or plans related to higher education, education technology, and online learning have been released in the last several months that indicate changes in how students learn, how they access their learning materials, and how that content is delivered.  In addition to this I will also give an overview of Millenials from the Pew Research Center.

In January 2010 the Sloan Consortium released their report on online education.  This report indicates that online experienced a growth of 17% in the last year.  Students in online classes comprise 25% of all students enrolled in higher education today, or 4.6 million students.    This 29 pages report found on the Sloan Consortium website presented the following information:

  • This report serves to strengthen the theory behind the economy and enrollments in education in general and now provides a direct link between  online education and enrollments.
  • Despite the growth in online education this platform continues to struggle to be seen as a strategic part of the long term planning for baccalaureate granting institution and public institutions.  In addition to this faculty acceptance of online/distance education is stagnant.
  • Overwhelming the student in online courses and programs are undergraduate who make up 82% of the students enrolled.

The issue of retention in online is also addressed in this report.   The question “Is retention in online harder than in  traditional face to face courses?”  This was administered via a survey of Chief Academic Officers which indicated that most were neutral on the question.  However those who agree outnumber of those who disagree.  Specifics on why this perception exists were not asked or provided.

Another report which was released by the US Department of Education is the:  Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies.  I previously blogged on this report however what this report indicates is that online learning, can,  under certain conditions,  provide better learning experiences to students.

Another study with trends to watch in distance education is theK-12 Online Learning reportfrom the Sloan Consortium. this 37 page report, based upon a survey administered to over 10,000 school districts, with a5/4% return of valid surveys,  published in January 2009 indicates that:

Most significant in regards to this report is the growth in online education which is illustrated by:

The overall number of K-12 students engaged in online courses in 2007-2008, is
estimated at 1,030,000. This represents a 47% increase since 2005-2006.

Major findings were that the majority (63.1 %) of the public school districts in the United States had at least one student enrolled in either a fully online or blended course; that a majority of administrators in these districts predicted that enrollments would grow by approximately twenty percent over the next two years; and that the total number enrolled in online or blended learning courses was estimated at approximately 700,000 public school K-12 students.

Most districts indicated that they anticipate growth in online:  A majority of the respondents anticipated growth (66.3% of districts expect growth in their fully online course enrollments and 61.2% expect growth in their blended enrollments). Districts predict that on average the number of students taking online courses will grow by 22.8 percent over the next two years.

Respondents indicate that the following are the major reasons why online education has grown and will continue to grow:

These results indicate that the perceived importance of online learning related mostly to student needs as follows:

1. Meeting the needs of specific groups of students
2. Offering courses not otherwise available at the school
3. Offering Advanced Placement or college-level courses
4. Permitting students who failed a course to take it again
5. Reducing scheduling conflicts for students

The respondents also indicated the following concerns regarding online courses:

1. Concerns about course quality
2. Course development and/or purchasing costs
3. Concerns about receiving funding based on student attendance for online   and/or blended/hybrid education courses
4. The need for teacher training

Another report that is related to online learning in K-12 is the Keeping Pace report which provides the following details:

The Keeping Pace 2009 report:

  • Provides a national “snapshot” of the state of online learning as of fall 2009.
  • Discusses original data categorized by key issues such as funding, teaching, and accountability, including analysis and recommendations.
  • Presents program profiles from a cross-section of program types, including state-led and district-led, supplemental and full-time, charter schools, and both synchronous and asynchronous programs.
  • Provides state profiles of K-12 online learning for most states, divided into southeastern, northeastern, central, and western regions.
  • Identifies key issues in online learning, building on the data gathered through the development of the program and state profiles.
  • Features a Notes from the Field section with in-depth examination of important new issues in online learning from national experts.
TheKeeping Pacereport provides further details on the growth of distance education in the K-12 arena:

Keeping Pace estimates the number of full-time online students at about                        175,000.  States with the largest numbers of full-time online students include                 Arizona, Ohio, Minnesota,  Colorado, Washington, California, and Pennsylvania.

The Keeping Pace report provided an overview of several types of online learning programs but which was of specific interest to me was the following note regarding university led online K12 programs:

University-run K-12 online programs have often been
overlooked but are another component of the online learning
landscape. Online programs that have emerged from previous
independent study programs of post-secondary institutions
tend to have relatively low levels of teacher involvement.

Available via the US Department of Education is the report:  Evaluation of the Enhancing Education Through Technology Program: Final Report.  This report provides the following details on the federal program that supported improving student academic achievement in elementary and secondary schools through the use of educational technology.

This reports indicates a continued upward trend in Internet access by schools with 63% of teachers indicating that they had  high speed Internet access in their classrooms.   No gaps were noted between student access to computers in these schools however some gaps were noted between student access to laptops in these institutions.

Another report which provides information on significant trends in the online market in general which may pertain to distance/online education is Morgan Stanley’s Mobile Internet Report.

Covering 8 key themes regarding the Mobile Internet which are:

1)  Wealth Creation / Destruction is Material in New Computing Cycles – Now in
Early Innings of Mobile Internet Cycle, the 5th Cycle of Last Half Century.

Wealth Creation / Destruction Is Material in New Computing Cycles – History shows that massive technology changes typically shift dynamics between incumbents / attackers, creating winners / losers. A handful of incumbents (like Apple, Google, Amazon.com, and Skype) appear especially well positioned for the mobile Internet, the fifth new cycle of the last half century.
2) Mobile Ramping Faster than Desktop Internet Did and Will Be Bigger Than
Most Think – 5 Trends Converging (3G + Social Networking + Video + VoIP +
Impressive Mobile Devices).

…the explosive Apple iPhone / iTouch ramp shows why usage of mobile devices on IPbased networks should surprise to the upside for years to come. As 3G adoption hits inflection points in many markets, consumers are flocking to a broad range of IPbased  usage models over powerful mobile Internet enabled devices. We predict that smartphones will outship the global notebook + netbook market in 2010E and out-ship the global PC market (notebook + netbook +
desktop) by 2012E.
3) Apple Leading in Mobile Innovation + Impact, for Now – Depth of App
Ecosystems + User Experience + Pricing Will Likely Determine Long-Term
Winners.

Near term, Apple is driving the platform change to mobile computing and leading in user experience. Its mobile ecosystem (iPhone + iTouch + iTunes + accessories + services) market share and impact should surprise on the upside for at least the next 1-2 years. Longer term, Google Android’s open operating system (combined with clever device manufacturers), emerging markets competition, and carrier limitations may pose challenges to Apple’s market share upside. RIM may maintain the enterprise lead, thanks to its installed base, but the long-term outlook is challenging.
4) Game-Changing Communications / Commerce Platforms (Social Networking +
Mobile) Emerging Very Rapidly.

Improvements in social networking and mobile computing platforms (led by Facebook + Apple ecosystems) are fundamentally changing how people communicate with each other and how developers, advertisers, and vendors can reach consumers. Mobile devices are evolving as remote controls for continually expanding types of real-time, cloud-based services – including emerging location-based services – creating opportunities and dislocations, empowering consumers in
unprecedented and transformative ways.
5) Growth / Monetization Roadmaps Provided by Japan Mobile + Desktop Internet.

Mobile Internet development in Japan and desktop Internet business
models provide significant runways for monetizing the mobile Internet through online commerce, paid services, and advertising; data access likely will continue to lose relative revenue share in the mobile Internet ecosystem.
6) Massive Data Growth Driving Carrier / Equipment Transitions.

Global mobile IP traffic is likely to grow 66x by 2013E (with 130% CAGR), per Cisco. Increasing 3G /smartphone penetration and emerging usage models (such as video / audio streaming) will stress carrier wireless networks. Carriers may be able to address the surge via capacity upgrades and offloading to Wi-Fi. Tiered data pricing (speed, quantity) will likely be critical to long-term revenue growth.

7) Compelling Opportunities in Emerging Markets.

Emerging markets have enormous potential for mobile Internet user growth, owing to low fixed-line telephone / broadband penetration + already vibrant mobile value added services. We expect 3G inflection points to be 2-3 years away, depending on the individual markets.
8) Regulators Can Help Advance / Slow Mobile Internet Evolution.

Inherent conflicts between the wants / needs of consumers and those of incumbent TMT providers are creating challenges for regulators.

While there is not much in the report that is education related specifically the upward trend in the use of mobile technology is an indication that users may demand the delivery of content:  text, video, and audio via their handheld devices.

The Pew Research Center provides a wealth of information which may assist educators to determine where the use of technology is trending by users.  A significant report on the “Millennial Generation”was recently released by them. The report defines the millenial generation as that age group which born after 1980 – the first generation to come of age in the new millennium

75% of the respondents, aged 18 – 29 years of age in late 2009 when the survey was conducted indicated that they have a profile on a Social Networking site.  Another significant factor that impacts education decisions of this age group is the large unemployment rate..nearly 37% of this age group indicate that they are currently unemployed.  (pp 10)

When it comes to education the survey found;

Millennials are more highly educated when ranked with other generations at comparable ages. More than half of Millennials have at least some college education (54%), compared with 49% of Gen Xers, 36% of Boomers and 24% of the Silent generation when they were ages 18 to 28. Millennials, when compared with previous generations at the same age, also are more likely to have completed high school.

Millenials are more likely to point to technology as a factor that distinguishes them from other generations.  Chapter 4, page 25 of the report covers the technical use of this generation from social media to mobile phone use.   The report states, they are more likely to have their own social networking profiles, to connect to the Internet wirelessly when away from home or work, and to post video of themselves online.
.. a majority of them are likely to use their cell phones for texting.

The following is also noted:

Millennials who have attended college are more likely than those who have no college experience to be online, use social networking sites, watch and post video online, connect to the Internet wirelessly, and send and receive text messages. Younger Millennials are more likely than older Millennials use the internet and social networking sites, and to have sent or received a larger number of text messages in the past 24 hours.  (page 25)

Millenials are used and in face may expect the use of wireless connectivity as indicated by the survey:

Far more Millennials who have attended college than those without college experience connect to the internet wirelessly: 74% who have been to college use wireless connections away from home or work, compared with 47% of those who have not attended college. The question did not specifically mention use of wireless connections at school. However, these findings likelyreflect to some degree the general situation on many campuses, where wireless connectivity is ubiquitous.

The use of a cell phone is common for this generation the results indicate that:

More than eight-in-ten (86%) adults now have a cell phone, including majorities across all age groups. Millennials are somewhat more likely than all other age groups to have a cell phone: 94% have one, as do 90% of Gen Xers and 89% of Boomers.

Given these statistics  as we design learning programs, campuses and other learning environments the needs of not only Gen Xers, Baby Boomers but also ensure that these programs and learning experiences are geared towards the needs of the millenials..the worlds is moving forwards in the advanced use of technology..and we can’t turn back the hands of time..we can only move ahead.   It is likely that their experiences during this recession will also influence their approach to education, the choices they make and their need for technology to access their education via online or distance delivery.

The next plan to watch is the National Broadband Plan. This plan is broken into seven market segments which includes Education, Public Safety, Government Performance, Civic Engagement, Health Care, Energy and Environment.   According to the website the plan achieves the following:

The National Broadband Plan lays out a bold roadmap to America’s                        future. These initiatives will stimulate economic growth, spur job                            creation, and boost our capabilities in education, healthcare, homeland                    security and more.

The plan was created by the Federal Communications Commission as a result of a series of workshops, seminars and a public forums.

Specifically attributed to education is the following:

  • Education. Broadband can enable improvements in public education through e-learning and online content, which can provide more personalized learning opportunities for students. Broadband can also facilitate the flow of information, helping teachers, parents, schools and other organizations to make better decisions tied to each student’s needs and abilities. To those ends, the plan includes recommendations to:
    • Improve the connectivity to schools and libraries by upgrading the FCC’s E-Rate program to increase flexibility, improve program efficiency and foster innovation by promoting the most promising solutions and funding wireless connectivity to learning devices that go home with students.
      • Accelerate online learning by enabling the creation of digital content and learning systems, removing regulatory barriers and promoting digital literacy.
      • Personalize learning and improve decision–making by fostering adoption of electronic educational records and improving financial data transparency in education.

There are several recommendations under each category listed above however those specific to education can be found here on this website. the focus of the report seems to be implementing expanded broadband services will support an infrastructure which will increase student access to online education.  Part of this initiative will include teacher and student training to better use the technology that they have available.   This plan will put into place minimum standards which schools and libraries will have to measure their progress in achieving adequate services to their students and patrons.   I can’t even begin to address the scope of this report but if you relate to any of those categories at the very least that on it ‘s own warrants a review of the initiatives detailed in this report.

In January of 2010 the New Media Consortium presented it’s annual Horizons report on  emerging initiatives in technology in education.   This report gives an overview of technologies to watch in the short to long term.  These include; mobile technology, opencourseware/open content, electronic books, simple augmented reality, gesture based computing, visual data analysis.

As I have illustrated with the above reports it may seem that technology, virtual learning environments, and new technologies are driving how we learn.  However our access to those learning materials, as well economy and generational factors also play a significant role as indicated by the data and information it seems that may very well be the case.

References
Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2009). Learning on Demand Online Education in the United States 2009 (Rep.). Sloan Consortium.

Horizons 2010 (Rep.). (2010, January 5). Retrieved March 24, 2010, from New Media Consortium website: http://wp.nmc.org/horizon2010/chapters/technologies/#0

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies (Rep.). US Department of Education.

Mobile Internet The Report (Rep.). (2009). Morgan Stanley.
National Broadband Plan Connecting America (Rep.). (2010). Federal Communications Commission.

National Education Technology Plan 2010 (Rep.). (2010). Office of Educational Technology Department of Education.

Piccianno, A., & Seaman, J. (2008). K-12 Online Learning A 2008 Survey of of US School District Administrators (Rep.). Sloan Consortium.

Taylor, P., & Teeter, S. (Eds.). (2009). The Millenials. Confident, connected, open to change (Rep.). Pew Research Center.

Watson, J., Gemin, B., Ryan, J., Wicks, M., Powell, A., Scantland, A., & Young, J. (n.d.). Keeping Pace with K-12 Online Learning (Rep.) (S. Bullock, J. Fitzpatrick, K. Loughrey, L. Pape, M. Revenaugh, T. Hitchcock, et al., Eds.).

  • Share/Bookmark
23
Mar

FACEBOOK!!!

by Cathy in Connectivisim, Distance Education, Education Technology, Higher Education, Learning theory, Uncategorized, Web 2.0, Web2.0, collaboration, learning student, online learning, web2.0 facebook twitter

Can Facebook be used to provide content, a place for group communication and interaction for academic courses and programs…well all signs indicate a solid yes to this question.  As I have a Facebook page I decided to review sites that are relevant to certain discipline areas.    The aim of this blog is to identify sites where academics have illustrated how they use Facebook and to point you to those sites that are relevant to certain discipline areas.

I would like to hear comments from you.  Does Facebook have an application in education and if so how?  And if you are using it how are you using it?

What tools does Facebook have in place to manage classes, groups, and networking?

Facebook can deliver content in the form of photos, videos, documents that have been scanned to jpg’s, and notes:

For example a search of Facebook for “Calculus” yields:
The Calculuswebsite which is a fan site for students in Calculus and collaboration in problem solving, etc., in that area.    As recent as yesterday, March 20,2010 as I write this blog I noticed that there is a detailed response to a student’s request for help solving a problem.
Another Calculussite states:  This page is based on Mr. Morris’ Calculus 1 class at Las Positas College; however, those not in the class may find the content useful too.  This site provides flashcards based upon up coming exams that students can use as study aids.
There are professional websites such as the English Teachers Site. This club is designed as a place for English teachers to share resources and discuss teaching strategies with colleagues near and far. Share with your fellow English teachers any lesson plans, activities, must-teach novels, useful websites, videos, or books for any grade level… we’d love to hear about it! So please, post away!…

Or this site: English teachers put more thought into a novelthan the actual author did.

Computer Science Student Group: The importance of CS has never been greater. We’re discovering ways to build just about everything out of small, simple mechanisms glued together with software, so no matter what you do, CS tends to be inside. And the scope of this new CS is amazing: We’re at the center of the action in biology, nanotechnology, particle physics. If society is ever going to slash medical costs, CS will play the key role. I see CS as a sort of universal science. We’re beginning to pervade everything.
Mathematics the Language of the Sciences: group is intended for people who enjoy solving and/or contemplating mathematical, physical, engineering problems, and who enjoy going beyond and study the philosophical assumptions, foundations, and implications of mathematics.  If you’re a mathematics, computer science, statistics, actuarial science, engineering major or you just love Mathematics, if you love to inquire about the philosophy of mathematics, or if you have any question in the field of Mathematics, then this is the group for you.
Health Informatics: This group joins interested people in Health Informatics, Medical Informatics, Healthcare IT, HIT – Health Information Technology, HIM – Health Information Management, HIS – Health Information Systems, Hospital Information Systems, CDSS – Clinical Decision Support Systems, EHR – Electronic Health Records, EMR – Electronic Medical Records, PACS – Picture Archiving and Communication Systems, DICOM – Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine, and many other related sciences and topics.


There are sites such as the
100 ways to use Facebook in the Classroom The Facebook Classroom: 25 Facebook Apps That Are Perfect for Online Education, or  this facebook site.

Application are available in Facebook such as the courses application which will allow  you to:

Display your courses on your profile for college or high school, find classmates, manage your schedule and assignments, create discussions, post notes, and form exclusive study groups. Welcome to Courses on Facebook.   You can use your Facebook course site as a “live syllabus” which will allow you to post assignments, communicate deadlines, deliver content, especially real time news feeds,  and facilitate discussions.

There is also a Files application which allows you to upload documents, photos, videos and pull informatin from your profile.

Is there an application in Pedagogy that Facebook lends itself to?  If so what is that?

Of course there is the relatively new and as yet evolving theory of connectivism:  a learning theory for the digital age,” has been developed by George Siemens and Stephen Downes based on their analysis of the limitations of behaviourism, cognitivism and constructivism to explain the effect technology has had on how we live, how we communicate, and how we learn.[1] Donald G. Perrin, Executive Editor of the International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning says the theory “combines relevant elements of many learning theories, social structures, and technology to create a powerful theoretical construct for learning in the digital age.”[1]  (  Retrieved from Wikipedia:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connectivism_%28learning_theory%29, Connectivism a learning theory for the digital age http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm, wikiveristy)

Social Learning theory:  that focuses on the learning that occurs within a social context. It considers that people learn from one another, including such concepts as observational learning, imitation, and modeling.

Social Learning Theory; Bandura emphasizes the importance of observing and modeling the behaviors, attitudes, and emotional reactions of others. Bandura (1977) states: “Learning would be exceedingly laborious, not to mention hazardous, if people had to rely solely on the effects of their own actions to inform them what to do. Fortunately, most human behavior is learned observationally through modeling: from observing others one forms an idea of how new behaviors are performed, and on later occasions this coded information serves as a guide for action.” (p22). Social learning theory explains human behavior in terms of continuous reciprocal interaction between cognitive, behavioral, an environmental influences. The component processes underlying observational learning are: (1) Attention, including modeled events (distinctiveness, affective valence, complexity, prevalence, functional value) and observer characteristics (sensory capacities, arousal level, perceptual set, past reinforcement), (2) Retention, including symbolic coding, cognitive organization, symbolic rehearsal, motor rehearsal), (3) Motor Reproduction, including physical capabilities, self-observation of reproduction, accuracy of feedback, and (4) Motivation, including external, vicarious and self reinforcement.  (retrieved from http://tip.psychology.org/bandura.html, 3/23/2010)

Action Learning: is an educational process whereby the participant studies their own actions and experience in order to improve performance. This concept is close to learning-by-doing and teaching through examples and repetitions.  Action learning is done in conjunction with others, in small groups called action learning sets or two-in, two-out team. It is proposed as particularly suitable for adults, as it enables each person to reflect on and review the action they have taken and the learning points arising. This should then guide future action and improve performance.  (retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_learning, 3/23/2010)

Action Learning: is a process of inquiry, beginning with the experience of not knowing ‘what to do next’, and finding that answers are not available through current expertise. When expertise fails to provide an answer, collaborative inquiry with fellow learners who are undergoing the same questioning experience is always available. To be effective, this partnership in learning needs to be both supportive and at the same time challenging, deeply caring yet questioning. Such partnerships actually create themselves when different people with different ideas engage whole-heartedly with each other to resolve each others’ problems.  (retrieved from What’s Action Learning 3/23/2010)

The use of Facebook and the potential of it is yet to be explored and documented fully as illustrated in this study by Schroeder and Greenbowe  who stated that “at the very least, the data suggest that students will use Facebook as an alternate mode of communication, particularly when deadlines approach. The results of this study may best be viewed as a case study, showing that for this specific group of students, Facebook proved to be a good medium for communication in the sense that students would use it.” (retrieved online http://gator.uhd.edu/~williams/AT/ChemOfFB.htm 3/23/2010)   Harris noted that the “growing influence demonstrates that the utilization of SNS can expand the dialogue outside of the classroom or campus, build better communication channels with students and may be valuable as a supplemental recruitment tool in higher education…” (Retrieved from   http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0WMX/is_18_25/ai_n30956801/, 3/23/2010)  Heiberger and Harper illustrate the application of Facebook and benefits to the students as:  Facebook gives them opportunities to learn about and self select into programs and services beneficial to them…. Facebook can help students simplify and prioritize their choices, manage their time wisely, and be aware of the wide variety of options available to them on campus…”  (retrieved from http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/sites/cyber.law.harvard.edu/files/Chapter%202%20-%20Facebook%20and%20Student%20Engagement.pdf  3/23/2010)
In conclusion it is evident that the use of Facebook may prove to be beneficial to students as a source of information, tutoring and collaboration as illustrated by the Calculus sites provided, it may serve as a discussion networking site for professional development, and even a connection for future employment opportunities as demonstrated by the Computer Science sites.
There are a variety of communication, content and networking tools available through Facebook such as the files and courses application, and are worth exploring.


  • Share/Bookmark
6
Mar

Retention in online education

by Cathy in Distance Education, Education, Higher Education, University, online learning

This is the blog I have been wanting to research, to think about and to write for some time..frankly this one just seemed too tough to tackle in many respects and that is how to address retention in online education.   There are just too many factors to consider and given that where does one even start?

I suppose a definition of retention would be fundamental as a starting point.    It is important to undertand that distance education via the web and using mobile technology is still a relatively new initiative in education.  The schools I have worked at or attended as a student did not start implementing online classes until the late 1990′s early 2000′s, given that it is still in the early stages of development.

Back in those early days of web based course you would hear about or experience courses that were not developed, faculty who failed to communicate with students and experience a confusion on how to access support services.  Much has changed today as educators and institutions understand that only fully developed courses should be put on line, that distance education students need access to support services, and that integration of media can enhance the content of an online course.

However in  spite of that there are several trends which have contributed to the phenomenal growth of distance education via the Internet.  This includes an increased demand for courses and program by those students who would not otherwise have access to educational opportunities via other means.

Retention can mean one thing to students, another to faculty, another to administrators and quite another to those who are responsible for funding programs and providing student financial aid. What this means is that the solutions, research, and even those we survey regarding the issue of retention may have different outcomes all coming from different perspectives.

Without any substantive research to back this I would propose that retention means, to students, successful educational goal completion.  Now what this means to student could be entirely different than what we  assume it to mean. This could mean the he/she accessed some components of a course for informational purposes, career purposes, or personal reasons and did not even feel it necessary to complete the course. It could mean course completion but no reason to continue enrolling in courses, or taking more than one course but not advancing to a degree, and finally degree completion.  For faculty this could mean successful completion of a course, successful advancement to the next level of the course, and/or successful degree completion.   For administration and funders this means successful completion of a course or degree advancement. In addition to this funders want to see and loans paid back ie) a low default rate on financial aid.    All have in mind that this course, courses or program will provide the student with personal fulfillment and/or the tools necessary to be a contributing member of society, having meaning work, and make a living wage.

With all of these differing perspectives on retention how does one measure it and determine what strategies should be in place to achieve the aim of improving retention of students distance education programs and courses.

There are several strategies that have been identified in the research.   The study conducted by Finnegan, Lee and Morris (2008) indicates that those students who successfully completed their courses spent more time on task (as indicated by the US DOE meta-analysis of distance education) more time interacting with others, and participated in online discussions more frequently,  (Lawler, 2007Sutton, Nora, 2008; Tello, 2008). While this time on task is critical it is also important to note that students would also withdraw or drop if they felt the work required of them in an online course exceeded that of the face to face course or required more reading. (Lawlor,2008)   These findings indicate the delicate balance that needs to take place in evaluating content for an online course, not enough does not engage the student or contributes towards achieving the outcomes, too much and the student feels that he/she is in a correspondence course and “reading” too much. (Lawler,2008)

The faculty can access Web 2.0 tools at little or no cost to supplant the text based content of a course.  He/she can use voice threads, Youtube, or some of these video related tools from Web2Go20 .   I will provide a brief overview of these sites, however I cannot vouch for their reliability or safety of use this is for informational purposes only.  I suggest you review the Terms of Service before using and give a few trial runs to ensure that they will meet your needs.

If, for whatever reason you choose to not use your Learning Management System to warehouse your videos I am providing the following here:

Flixtime: turns your photos and videos into stunning and unique videos in just minutes!             Sign-up for a free account, and upload your images, videos and music. Then, sit back             and watch your masterpiece come together!

For sharing videos with a distributed group you may want to check outSynchTube.
synchtube allows you to create rooms to share synchronzied YouTube videos.
This means everyone in the room is viewing the same video at the same time!                       The built in chat allows you to even discuss the best parts, or share other videos.
Watch videos with friends, or even DJ music with the social playlists — it is up to you

Masher looks like another great site to provide a “mash up” of your videos, photos, music or audio recordings.

According to their site Masher isa site which let’s you easily create a video by mashing together video clips, music tracks and photos. So you can create a video to brag about your holiday, to wish your friend happy birthday, or to show off your creative side. Whatever you have to say, a video speaks a squillion words, so get mashing! Masher was created in 2008 and has an incredible built-in library of footage and music that you can use in your creations for free. The free video library archive features thousands of high quality clips, including footage from CBS News, BBC Motion Gallery, China Central Television, NHK Japan, Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Rip Curl, Huntley Archives and many more.

These tools and many others like them can make your course development easier, allow you to move away from text based content to video and audio, and finally break that umbilical chord to the publisher’s power points.

These tools can also provide for greater student to student interaction, student to faculty interaction, and student to content interaction. (Tello, Louis, 2008; Lawlor, D., 2008;Disalvio, P. 2008) These interactions have also been demonstrated to be essential to student retention in the review of the literature and are also standards reviewed using the Quality Matters Rubric®.

Online education is susceptible to those factors that contribute to dropping out in face to face or traditional education as well as additional factors such as discomfort with the technology, not having a solid technical infrastructure to support online education and falling victim to the assumption that because it is on line it will be easier than a face to face class.  Online education is not easier than face to face, however it should be just as hard, with consideration for the fact that much of it is written and therefore requires the time necessary to read and absorb content.  Online education also requires a very structured approach on the part of the faculty, it does not provide the faculty who designs and teaches the course with “free time, ” because it is  online.

Faculty who are intent  upon doing an outstanding job will recognize that he/she almost needs to log into the course daily, to be consistently present in the course.  The course will be designed from start to finish and will allow for little variance from that structure throughout the semester.  However the course will be designed with few deadlines for the student so that it will meet his/her needs for flexibility which is probably one of the primary reasons why he/she enrolled in the course in the first place.

The research demonstrates that student to faculty communication is a key factor in student retention.  This means that the faculty has set office hours, defines timeliness when he or she will respond to emails (sometimes 24 hours which means logging in to the course and checking email on the weekend), and timely feedback on assignment within 3 days, (quite a challenge if the course has 100 students or more)(Drouin,  2008; Tello, 2008; Lawlor, D, 2007; Finnegan, Morris, Lee 2008).

The research also reveals those student related factors that institutions may or may not be able to address.  These include work related demands, time management,  and technical issues. (Lawlor, D 2007; Finnegan, Morris, Lee, 2007; Disalvio, P., 2008; Lorenzetti, P 2005)

This is the first in a series of reviews of research and literature I intend to do in order to aggregate the recent findings, compile best practices and design strategies that can be implemented to improve student success.

Literature Review
Angelino, L. “A Case Study on Graduates from an Online Certificate Program and Their Experiences Related to Engagement Practices.” Diss. Clemson University, 2009. Print.
Disalvio, Phillip. “SETONWORLDWIDE: A CASE STUDY OF STUDENT SUCCESS.” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks; 13.3 (2009): 29-36. Print.
Drouin, Michelle. “HE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STUDENTS’ PERCEIVED SENSE OF COMMUNITY AND SATISFACTION, ACHIEVEMENT, AND RETENTION IN AN ONLINE COURSE.” Quarterly Review of Distance Education 9.30 (2008): 267-84. Print.
Finnegan, Catherine, Libby Morris, and Sz-Shyan Wu. “Redicting Retention in Online General Education Courses.” American Journal of Distance Education 19.1 (2005): 23-36. Print.
Hannum, Wallace H., Matthew Irvin, Pui-Wa Lie, and Thomas Farmer. “Effectiveness of Using Learner-centered Principles on Student Retention in Distance Education Courses in Rural Schools.” Distance Education 29.3 (2008): 211-29. Print.
Lorenzetti, Jennifer. “Secrets of Online Success: Lessons from the Community Colleges.” Distance Education Report 1 July 2005: 3-6. Print.
McCracken, Holly. “BEST PRACTICES IN SUPPORTING PERSISTENCE OF DISTANT EDUCATION STUDENTS THROUGH INTEGRATED WEB-BASED SYSTEMS.” Journal of College Student Retention 10.1 (2008): 65-91. Print.
Morris, Libby, and Catherine Finnegan. “BEST PRACTICES IN PREDICTING AND ENCOURAGING STUDENT PERSISTENCE AND ACHIEVEMENT ONLINE.” Journal of College Student Retention 10.1 (2008): 55-64. Print.
Porta Merida, Sandra. “Online Learning Success: Underlying Constructs Affecting Student Attrition.” Diss. Lynn University, 2009. Print.
Snyder, Blanca. “TECHNOLOGY AND HIGHER EDUCATION: THE IMPACT OF E-LEARNING APPROACHES ON STUDENT ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTIONS AND PERSISTENCE.” Journal of College Student Retention 10.1 (2008): 3-19. Print.
Sutton, Stephen C., and Amaury Nora. “AN EXPLORATION OF COLLEGE PERSISTENCE FOR STUDENTS ENROLLED IN WEB-ENHANCED COURSES: A MULTIVARIATE ANALYTIC APPROACH.” Journal of College Student Retention 10.1 (2008): 21-37. Print.
  • Share/Bookmark
12
Oct

Second LIfe "Mash – Up" of research and observations

by Cathy in Distance Education, Second Life, vritual worlds

The following is a synthesis of observations of three resources on virtual worlds, specifically Second Life, and how this medium can be applied to education, training, and learning. This is my initial presentation using these resources, it is a “mash-up” if you will, to determine if these is a common theme or thread that can be identified and defined as a best practice(s) in using Second Life for education. The three sources I have identified for this initial paper are: Commentary: Virtual Planning and the Online Studio by Justan B. Hollander, David Thomas from the Journal of Planning Education and Research 2009, Avatars, People and Virtual Worlds, Foundations for Research in the Metaverse, Alanah Davis, John Murphy, Dawn Owens, Depepak Khazanchi and Ilze Zigurs, in the February 2009 Journal of Virtual Worlds Research and finally Thomas Malaby’s book Making Virtual Worlds: Linden Lab and Second Life.

A review of the Malaby’s book is helpful. Malaby does a fine job of exposing the inner workings of Linden Labs, the history and the culture of the business. It is in this context the mission, the vision and the overall philosophy of Linden Labs that one can begin to design a strategy for applying the use of Second Life as a learning environment. In determining the appropriate use of Linden Labs in education presenting the mission of Second Life/Linden Labs seems key: “It is our mission to connect us all to an online world that advance the human condition.” Another, what I term “philosophical statement’ identified by Malaby is “The eye observes the world, the hand shapes it. For this reason many cultures embrace the eye-in-hand as a symbol of creation that springs from knowledge as do we. Take it as your invitation to create a Second Life that inspires ever more wonder, ever more imagination.” In the context of two statements it is little wonder that Second Life is finding itself as the virtual world of choice for educators. After all what is the purpose of education but to inspire wonder and create motivation for individuals to seek more knowledge and create more knowledge?

Holland and Thomas sought to pursue answers to the following concerns:

“For planning educators, do these new 3-D environments offer a chance to dramatically improve the curriculum or simply sit as one more technological distraction to the important work of training planners?” In order to address the researchers looked deeper asking,(1) How does physical planning pedagogy benefit from using a tool such as Second Life? or What are the benefits of using a tool such as Second Life for physical planning pedagogy? and (2) What are some of the implications of moving education off the drafting table and pin-up wall and into an active, simulated computer–based world?”

Furthermore the question may be asked in this context: Can learning be designed in virtual worlds to provide a sense of engagement and presence that maybe lacking in a “traditional learning management system?”

The methodology of this research required that students keep journals, observations, end of semester course evaluations, with both closed and open ended questions. The students were also asked to wrote a final essay evaluating their learning experiences using Second Life. Finally the 71 students involved in the program were required to address a last essay question detailing their experiences in Second Life. The findings of this research were based upon the following:

(1) integration of skills and knowledge in a field example, (2) development of teamwork skills, (3) improvement of problem-finding and problem-solving skills, and (4) exposure to a professional social experience (Hollander and Thomas 2009, Greene 1988; Dutton 1987; Schon 1984; Heumann and Wetmore 1984).

This study sought to address the benefits of using Second Life in these specific areas:

Field experience, teamwork skills, problem-finding and problem-solving skills and professional socializing experience. Benefits were found in the areas of field experience and teamwork skills, with little or no benefit noted in the areas of problem finding and problem solving skills and professional socializing experiences. The authors noted that students spent a great deal of time together to work on projects but chose to not activate social networking tools and that “…students were able to successfully improve their problem-finding and problem-solving skills, but only marginally better than in a traditional studio.” It seems that on these two points there is a parallel result between the application of virtual worlds and traditional learning environments, the use of Second Life did not prove to motivate or enhance either points. However it is not noted how the teams were established either in traditional working environment or what sort of problem solving projects the students were given and how the parallel each other in scope.

Ultimately the researchers noted that the “biggest strength of Second Life is also its biggest weakness,” this being the unstructured environment this world provides. This lack of structure which may prove to be a barrier to some also proves to provide an environment that facilitates invention and creativity. In providing a 3D environment for learning what sort of advantages does Second Life offer beyond programs such as Sketchup and AutoCad? The authors noted that ..”Such programs pale in that regard in comparison with what Second Life offers: it creates a forum for exploring planning and design as social interactions and processes, rather than as simply knowledge and technique. Second Life goes beyond
visualization to a unique quality: virtualization, introducing the user to a real-time virtual 3-D environment that can be a powerful learning tool.”

In the Davis, et. al., article the researchers sought to identify the following:

“The potential for contribution to knowledge lies in several areas. First, the study of virtual teams in a metaverse environment can contribute to a deeper understanding of virtual collaboration and teamwork in traditional contexts. Second, a theoretically-defined set of technology capabilities can show how metaverses are different from other kinds of environments and how their uniqueness might enhance the functioning of virtual teams. Third, a clear insight into metaverse capabilities and use can lead to recommendations for the continuing design of advanced technologies for virtual team collaboration. Our overall goal is to enhance research and practice for virtual teams working in a metaverse environment. We present a conceptual model for understanding metaverses and develop a set of recommendations for research in this new area. Our proposed model is different from earlier models of group support and collaboration technologies because it accounts for the unique technology capabilities of and behaviors in metaverse environments. Organizations and academic institutions that are exploring the use of metaverses can benefit by seeing how team interaction might be enhanced. Virtual team managers can benefit by being aware of the basic characteristics of this new environment and how its technological capabilities have potential to provide a richer form of interaction for virtual teams. Researchers can benefit from the foundation for future research in terms of constructs, propositions, and research challenges.”

This article meshes well with the Holland and Thomas article because to seeks to identify strategies that facilitate team collaboration and work in the metaverse, furthermore their research seeks to identify those technical challenges that may impede the progress in these areas. The researchers identified several dimensions which are critical to facilitating teamwork in the virtual environment these are: presence, communication, technology, rendering, interaction, and team process. Each of these are defined as:

Presence:

The term “presence” is related to a wide field of research. Lombard and Ditton identified six different explications of presence that have been used in the literature: presence as • social richness, the extent to which the medium is perceived as sociable, warm, sensitive, or personal when it is used to interact with other people; • realism, the extent to which a medium can seem perceptual and/or socially realistic; • transportation , the sensations of “you are there,” “it is here,” and/or “we are together”; • immersion, the extent to which the senses are engaged by the mediated environment; • social actor within medium, the extent to which the user responds socially to a representation of a person through a medium; and • medium as social actor, the extent to which the medium itself is perceived as a social actor (e.g., treating computers as social entities2
(retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue2/lombard.html, 10/09/09)

Communication: having the tools to effectively collaborate and communicate in and out of Second Life is critical. Second Life has group features which allow for group text chat and voice chat as well as voice and text chat in “local” venues and one on one private voice/text chat.

Technology: The researchers also addressed the issue of technology. Technology does impact the ability of teams to form and work together. While a platform may have excellent technology on the sending end of things it is only as good as the technology on the user end. Because of this one must ask…is the technology of Second Life and other virtual worlds too sophisticated, does it impede the use of virtual worlds in learning, can it be ubiquitous?

Rendering: Rendering is defined as the ability to create life like images on the screen and it is supported by the capabilities of personalization of an avatar appearance; they can also have a personal focus through direct contact with other avatars. One may find communication, immersion and presence enhanced by the ability to demonstrate non verbal speaking animations in world.

Interaction: While this is noted by the researchers I believe it relates back to communication and is the underlying theme of team processes.

Team Processes: The researchers note that effective tools and strategies are not completely in place to facilitate collaboration in virtual worlds.

In review it is evident that it was not the mission of Linden Labs/Second Life to provide the design or game design to users to address and solve problems. Instead Linden Labs provides the means to allow user to be creative in designing their own space, groups, communicating, and games. The user has to stratgize how to implement these. It goes without saying that in achieving this aim users are challenged, the platform is sometimes not malleable in meeting these demands, however there is evidence of success. Recognition goes to those users who are savvy enough to use the tools available to them to be creative, to be innovative and develop a learning environment that meets the needs of their students. In reflection I now recognize that Second Life will not give you a “cookie cutter” approach to addressing the needs for presence, communication, technology, how to develop teams and team processes..but will provide you with the tools and the expectation that you, as user, will design those aspects to best meet your needs.

  • Share/Bookmark
28
Sep

Connectivism and related concepts

by Cathy in Connectivisim, Distance Education, cck09, learning ttheory

I have been struggling with keeping up with the connectivism course and defining the concepts and determining how they apply to learning. I feel somewhat successful with seeing the connection between social learning theory, systems learning theory, and connectivism

Social Learning is defined as follows:

Social learning theory focuses on the learning that occurs within a social context. It considers that people learn from one another, including such concepts as observational learning, imitation, and modeling. (retrieved from http://teachnet.edb.utexas.edu/~lynda_abbott/Social.html)

Social Learning Theory posits that people learn from one another, via observation, imitation, and modeling. The theory has often been called a bridge between behaviorist and cognitive learning theories because it encompasses attention, memory, and motivation. (retrieved from http://www.learning-theories.com/social-learning-theory-bandura.html)

Systems learning theory (team learning)

Systems learning theory: from Senge’s concept of “team learning.” Team learning in this context focuses instead on the transmission of both tacit and explicit knowledge throughout the group as well as the creation of an environment in which focused creativity can flourish. Three aspects of team learning were identified as follows: “the ability to think insight fully about complex issues, the ability to take innovative, coordinated action, the ability to create a network that will allow other teams to take action.”

Other applicable theories/concepts:

Cybernetics is the theory of communication and control based on regulatory feedback. Further definitions include: “a science concerned with the study of systems of any nature which are capable of receiving, storing, and processing information so as to use it for control”-A.N. Kolmogorov

Cybernetique= the art of growing”–A.M. Ampere

In the book Communities of Play the author Celia Peace identified communities of play in the context of communities of practice. Communities of practice can be defined as: Community of Practice (CoP) is the process of social learning that occurs and the shared sociocultural practices that emerge and evolve when people who have common goals interact as they strive towards those goals. (retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_of_practice). And as follows: community of practice defines itself along three dimensions:

  • What it is about – its joint enterprise as understood and continually renegotiated by its members
  • How it functions mutual engagement that bind members together into a social entity
  • What capability it has produced – the shared repertoire of communal resources (routines, sensibilities, artifacts, vocabulary, styles, etc.) that members have developed over time.

Pearce used the following definition for community of practice as “a group of individuals who engage in a process of collective learning and maintain a common identity defined by a shared domain of interest or activity.” Furthermore the definition of community is offered as an association of individuals with a collective will that is enacted through individual effort.

What does it mean to learn? How long has it been since you have looked at the definition: Learning is acquiring new knowledge, behaviors, skills, values, preferences or understanding, and may involve synthesizing different types of information.

Another related concept is that of autopoetic systems which are ‘structurally coupled’ with their medium, embedded in a dynamic of changes that can be recalled as sensory-motor coupling. This continuous dynamic is considered as at least a rudimentary form of knowledge or cognition and can be observed throughout life-forms.

Finally the concept of “participative pedagogy,” as defined by Rheingold is that “we must develop a participative pedagogy, that focuses on catalyzing, inspiring, nourishing, facilitating and guiding literacies essential to individual and collective life in the 21st century.

Ultimately connectivitism ties all of the above together, fundamentally connectivism is the acquisition and distribution on knowledge across a network of connections. George Siemens asserts that learning is primarily social while Stephen Downes that learning can occur without a society. Further observations identify learning as an immersion into one’s community, that learning is social. Connectivism takes the above concepts and theories one step further and recognizes how the underlying technology facilities or provides a platform for the creation of a personal learning network.

  • Share/Bookmark