Can Facebook be used to provide content, a place for group communication and interaction for academic courses and programs…well all signs indicate a solid yes to this question.  As I have a Facebook page I decided to review sites that are relevant to certain discipline areas.    The aim of this blog is to identify sites where academics have illustrated how they use Facebook and to point you to those sites that are relevant to certain discipline areas.

I would like to hear comments from you.  Does Facebook have an application in education and if so how?  And if you are using it how are you using it?

What tools does Facebook have in place to manage classes, groups, and networking?

Facebook can deliver content in the form of photos, videos, documents that have been scanned to jpg’s, and notes:

For example a search of Facebook for “Calculus” yields:

The Calculuswebsite which is a fan site for students in Calculus and collaboration in problem solving, etc., in that area.    As recent as yesterday, March 20,2010 as I write this blog I noticed that there is a detailed response to a student’s request for help solving a problem.

Another Calculussite states:  This page is based on Mr. Morris’ Calculus 1 class at Las Positas College; however, those not in the class may find the content useful too.  This site provides flashcards based upon up coming exams that students can use as study aids.

There are professional websites such as the English Teachers Site. This club is designed as a place for English teachers to share resources and discuss teaching strategies with colleagues near and far. Share with your fellow English teachers any lesson plans, activities, must-teach novels, useful websites, videos, or books for any grade level… we’d love to hear about it! So please, post away!…

Or this site: English teachers put more thought into a novelthan the actual author did.

Computer Science Student Group: The importance of CS has never been greater. We’re discovering ways to build just about everything out of small, simple mechanisms glued together with software, so no matter what you do, CS tends to be inside. And the scope of this new CS is amazing: We’re at the center of the action in biology, nanotechnology, particle physics. If society is ever going to slash medical costs, CS will play the key role. I see CS as a sort of universal science. We’re beginning to pervade everything.

Mathematics the Language of the Sciences: group is intended for people who enjoy solving and/or contemplating mathematical, physical, engineering problems, and who enjoy going beyond and study the philosophical assumptions, foundations, and implications of mathematics.  If you’re a mathematics, computer science, statistics, actuarial science, engineering major or you just love Mathematics, if you love to inquire about the philosophy of mathematics, or if you have any question in the field of Mathematics, then this is the group for you.

Health Informatics: This group joins interested people in Health Informatics, Medical Informatics, Healthcare IT, HIT – Health Information Technology, HIM – Health Information Management, HIS – Health Information Systems, Hospital Information Systems, CDSS – Clinical Decision Support Systems, EHR – Electronic Health Records, EMR – Electronic Medical Records, PACS – Picture Archiving and Communication Systems, DICOM – Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine, and many other related sciences and topics.

There are sites such as the 100 ways to use Facebook in the Classroom The Facebook Classroom: 25 Facebook Apps That Are Perfect for Online Education, or  this facebook site.

Application are available in Facebook such as the courses application which will allow  you to:

Courses

Display your courses on your profile for college or high school, find classmates, manage your schedule and assignments, create discussions, post notes, and form exclusive study groups. Welcome to Courses on Facebook.   You can use your Facebook course site as a “live syllabus” which will allow you to post assignments, communicate deadlines, deliver content, especially real time news feeds,  and facilitate discussions.

There is also a Files application which allows you to upload documents, photos, videos and pull informatin from your profile.

Is there an application in Pedagogy that Facebook lends itself to?  If so what is that?

Of course there is the relatively new and as yet evolving theory of connectivism:  a learning theory for the digital age,” has been developed by George Siemens and Stephen Downes based on their analysis of the limitations of behaviourism, cognitivism and constructivism to explain the effect technology has had on how we live, how we communicate, and how we learn.^[1] Donald G. Perrin, Executive Editor of the International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning says the theory “combines relevant elements of many learning theories, social structures, and technology to create a powerful theoretical construct for learning in the digital age.”^{[1]  (  Retrieved from Wikipedia:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connectivism_%28learning_theory%29, Connectivism a learning theory for the digital age http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm, wikiveristy)}

Social Learning theory:  that focuses on the learning that occurs within a social context. It considers that people learn from one another, including such concepts as observational learning, imitation, and modeling.

Social Learning Theory; Bandura emphasizes the importance of observing and modeling the behaviors, attitudes, and emotional reactions of others. Bandura (1977) states: “Learning would be exceedingly laborious, not to mention hazardous, if people had to rely solely on the effects of their own actions to inform them what to do. Fortunately, most human behavior is learned observationally through modeling: from observing others one forms an idea of how new behaviors are performed, and on later occasions this coded information serves as a guide for action.” (p22). Social learning theory explains human behavior in terms of continuous reciprocal interaction between cognitive, behavioral, an environmental influences. The component processes underlying observational learning are: (1) Attention, including modeled events (distinctiveness, affective valence, complexity, prevalence, functional value) and observer characteristics (sensory capacities, arousal level, perceptual set, past reinforcement), (2) Retention, including symbolic coding, cognitive organization, symbolic rehearsal, motor rehearsal), (3) Motor Reproduction, including physical capabilities, self-observation of reproduction, accuracy of feedback, and (4) Motivation, including external, vicarious and self reinforcement.  (retrieved from http://tip.psychology.org/bandura.html, 3/23/2010)

Action Learning: is an educational process whereby the participant studies their own actions and experience in order to improve performance. This concept is close to learning-by-doing and teaching through examples and repetitions.  Action learning is done in conjunction with others, in small groups called action learning sets or two-in, two-out team. It is proposed as particularly suitable for adults, as it enables each person to reflect on and review the action they have taken and the learning points arising. This should then guide future action and improve performance.  (retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_learning, 3/23/2010)

Action Learning: is a process of inquiry, beginning with the experience of not knowing ‘what to do next’, and finding that answers are not available through current expertise. When expertise fails to provide an answer, collaborative inquiry with fellow learners who are undergoing the same questioning experience is always available. To be effective, this partnership in learning needs to be both supportive and at the same time challenging, deeply caring yet questioning. Such partnerships actually create themselves when different people with different ideas engage whole-heartedly with each other to resolve each others’ problems.  (retrieved from What’s Action Learning 3/23/2010)

The use of Facebook and the potential of it is yet to be explored and documented fully as illustrated in this study by Schroeder and Greenbowe  who stated that “at the very least, the data suggest that students will use Facebook as an alternate mode of communication, particularly when deadlines approach. The results of this study may best be viewed as a case study, showing that for this specific group of students, Facebook proved to be a good medium for communication in the sense that students would use it.” (retrieved online http://gator.uhd.edu/~williams/AT/ChemOfFB.htm 3/23/2010)   Harris noted that the “growing influence demonstrates that the utilization of SNS can expand the dialogue outside of the classroom or campus, build better communication channels with students and may be valuable as a supplemental recruitment tool in higher education…” (Retrieved from   http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0WMX/is_18_25/ai_n30956801/, 3/23/2010)  Heiberger and Harper illustrate the application of Facebook and benefits to the students as:  Facebook gives them opportunities to learn about and self select into programs and services beneficial to them…. Facebook can help students simplify and prioritize their choices, manage their time wisely, and be aware of the wide variety of options available to them on campus…”  (retrieved from http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/sites/cyber.law.harvard.edu/files/Chapter%202%20-%20Facebook%20and%20Student%20Engagement.pdf  3/23/2010)

In conclusion it is evident that the use of Facebook may prove to be beneficial to students as a source of information, tutoring and collaboration as illustrated by the Calculus sites provided, it may serve as a discussion networking site for professional development, and even a connection for future employment opportunities as demonstrated by the Computer Science sites.

There are a variety of communication, content and networking tools available through Facebook such as the files and courses application, and are worth exploring.

Learners must balance life responsibilities with the demands of learning.

Learner are autonomous and self directed.

Learners have a tremendous amount of life experiences.  They need to connect the                  learning to their knowledge base.  They must recognize the value of the learning.

Learners are goal oriented and know for what purpose they are learning new information.

Learning is self-initiated and tends to last a long time.

Adults as learners take on a great deal of responsibility for learning themselves.  This greatly alters the role of teacher in the learning environments in general but virtual worlds specifically.

Collaborative learning or cooperative learning was another learning theory cited by respondents as most often applied to the design of the learning program in Second Life.  The lecture, listening and note taking lives along side other processes are are based in student discussion and active work with the course content/ materials.  The design of the course is to ensure an intellectual experience for the students and emergent learning processes are identified..however key to the learning process is the discussion. (Macgregor and Smith, 1992, retrieved from http://learningcommons.evergreen.edu/pdf/collab.pdf)

The interactive environment of Second Life lends itself very well to the application of collaborative learning.  The benefits of this learning theory is viewed as freeing up professors from lecturing and allow them time to collaborate with students, enables students to collaborate with other independent of time and geography and provides a new mode for the production of knowledge.   (Tapscott, Don and Williams, Anthony, Educause Review 2010, 45, 1, January 2010)

Those examples of collaborative learning include any activities in which students work together to achieve a common goal.  These learning opportunities maybe well suited to role play, creation of learning objects, and communication activities.   Second Life provides many tools which may support the student in achieving the learning outcomes of a collaborative learning activity these include the communication tools, any activity in which they can create content in world, and the use of the group tools to support and encourage group and team work.

Collaborative learning theory is built upon those tenets of quality that we review in distance education these include student to student communication, student to content, and student to faculty.  These learning activities are illustrated as below:

The model above identifies several avenues of social interchange which seems to support the respondents observations regarding social learning theory.  Bandura identified and defined social learning theory in 1977 as the, “importance of observing and modeling the behaviors, attitudes, and emotional reactions of others….further

In addition to this, due to the rich immersive experience of being in virtual worlds experiential learning seems to be a logical choice for designing learning activities in virtual worlds.  Kolb defined experiential learning as follows: “experiential learning theory defines learning as ‘the process whereby knowledge is created through the transformation of experience. Knowledge results from the combination of grasping and transforming experience’”(Kolb 1984, p. 41, retrieved from http://www.d.umn.edu/~kgilbert/educ5165-731/Readings/experiential-learning-theory.pdf, 2/10/10).  Fernwick, in 2007, identified the five dimensions of experiential learning as purpose, interpretation, engagement, self, and context.

Finally several respondents noted connectivism as a learning theory to be applied to designing course activities in virtual worlds.  Connectivism is a learning theory that should be at the forefront of learning in this digital age.  Defined by Siemens and Downes it takes into account the impact that advances in educational technology has had on how we learn.  (Siemens, 2005, retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm 2/10/10).

Siemens, 2005, further describes connectivism as the integration of eprinciples explored chaos, network and complexity and self organization theories.  He identified the following:

Principles of connectivism:

• Learning and knowledge rests in diversity of opinions.
• Learning is a process of connecting specialized nodes or information sources.
• Learning may reside in non-human appliances.
• Capacity to know more is more critical than what is currently known
• Nurturing and maintaining connections is needed to facilitate continual learning.
• Ability to see connections between fields, ideas, and concepts is a core skill.
• Currency (accurate, up-to-date knowledge) is the intent of all connectivist learning activities.
• Decision-making is itself a learning process. Choosing what to learn and the meaning of incoming information is seen through the lens of a shifting reality. While there is a right answer now, it may be wrong tomorrow due to alterations in the information climate affecting the decision.

Connectivism lends itself very well to the current wave of information, social networking, technology, and change that we experience on a daily basis.  How this theory will allow us as learners and teachers apply the appropriate tools that we need to in order to learn is critical to assisting learners in achieving their goals.  Applying the environment of Second Life to facilitate learning, achieve the aim of decision making as a learning process and making effective decisions  is critical, however those opportunities are there as one engages in the virtual environment.

Putting the onus of learning on the student in student centered learning versus teacher centered learning requires a more consistent method of providing a means for the student to gather feedback on his/her progress in achieving the learning outcomes.  It is the learning outcomes that are fundamental to the assessment process.  The feedback or assessment that should be consistent, constant, and non intrusive to the student accessing the content or activiites he or she needs, and allow the student with the opportunity to apply new knowledge as well as prior learning.

Even if an individual goes off on his/her own explorations in the virtual world he or she can maintain connections with their group, engaged in the environment and observing the creation of objects and how they were designed by others.  They can communicate their findings back to their core group, ask questions of the builder who designed the object, can evaluate the object, and monitor, based upon the feedback if their activities are achieving the course or program learning outcomes. Essentially successfully achieving the outcomes is demonstrated by how successful the student is in demonstrating what he/she has learned, how they communicate their activities, and how they can demonstrate what they have learned to real life and virtually.

It is apparent that those who design learning experiences in virtual worlds can identify those practices which lend themselves best to the opportunities provided in Second Life for education.  Understanding the basic fundamentals of learning theories helps the educator best craft a learning “blueprint,” which justifies and drives the learning activities for students.  This justification is critical for students to grasp immediately and thereby makes their experience that much richer.  Getting students comfortable in Second Life as soon as  possible is essential so they can get beyond learning the basic fundamentals of navigation, communication and the culture so they can quickly access what they need to learn is critical.

Bandura, A. (1977), Social Learning Theory, as retrieved from http://tip.psychology.org/bandura.html.

Fenwick, Tara J, & Gouthro, Patricia (REVIEWER). (2004). Learning through experience: troubling orthodoxies and intersecting questions Review of the Learning through experience: troubling orthodoxies and intersecting questions Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 50(2), 211-214.  Retrieved February 10, 2010, from CBCA Complete.

Holistic. (2007, February 22). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 00:25, February 11, 2010, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Holistic&oldid=110097300

Kolb, David A.., Boyatzis, Richard, Mainemelis, Charalampos, Experiential Learning Theory:
Previous Research and New Directions R. J. Sternberg and L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on cognitive, learning, and thinking styles. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000.

Macgregor, Jean, Smith, Barbara; What is Collaborative Learning? retrieved from http://learningcommons.evergreen.edu/pdf/collab.pdf 2/10/10.

Siemens, George,Connectivism:A Learning Theory for the Digital Age, 2004, retrieved from Elearnspace, http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm).

Tapscott, Don and Williams, Anthony,Innovating the 21st-Century University: It’s Time!.  Educause Review, 45, 1.

Virtual world. (2010, February 7). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 00:24, February 11, 2010, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Virtual_world&oldid=342452412

As I listened to George Siemens and Stephen Downes discuss how they defined Connectivism, as a learning theory within their respective frames of reference, I started to consider how I would define it, what my frame of reference would be, even though some time and a lot of other things have occurred since my dissertation research I would say it would have to be systems theory. For those of you who are not familiar with systems theory it is: an interdisciplinary theory about the nature of complex systems in nature, society, and science. More specifically, it is a framework by which one can investigate and/or describe any group of objects that work in concert to produce some result. (retrieve from Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_theory, 9/18/09) In essence, it is based upon the notion that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts…it got me to thinking about how connectivism which is defined as: the thesis that knowledge is distributed across a network of connections, and therefore that learning consists of the ability to construct and traverse those network, by Stepen Downes in his blog; Half an Hour. (retrieved 9/18/09) Further definitions of connectivism include the following; “a learning theory for the digital age,” has been developed by George Siemens and Stephen Downes based on their analysis of the limitations of behaviourism, cognitivism and constructivism to explain the effect technology has had on how we live, how we communicate, and how we learn…(retrieved from Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connectivism_(learning_theory. )

Systems learning theory includes Senge’s five disciplines which are: systems thinking, personal mastery, mental models, building shared vision and team learning.

Personal Mastery: Organizations learn only through individuals who learn. Individual learning does not guarantee organizational learning. But without it no organizational learning occurs….People with a high level of personal mastery live in a continual learning mode. They never ‘arrive’. (Senge, 1990)

Mental Models: Deeply ingrained assumptions, generalizations, or even pictures and images that influence how we understand the world and how we take action… turning the mirror inward; learning to unearth our internal pictures of the world, to bring them to the surface and hold them rigorously to scrutiny. (Senge, 1990) Includes self-reflection, sharing with others, “mashing up,” and knowledge creation

Building a shared vision: a shared vision is “something that inspires people and gets them to pull together for cooperative action. People really get energized by what their group is trying to accomplish.…” (retrieved from http://www.healthyworkclimate.com/htm/Vision/sharedvisiondef.htm, 9/19/09)

Team learning: the process of aligning and developing the capacities of a team to credit the results as its members design—allows for rapid growth among team members or rapid learning—the use of technology allows for unique opportunities for teams to come together and practice the concepts of the five disciplines.

Systems theory is merely the frame of reference in which I place connectivism to better understand how the concept can be applied to learning. I can apply the discipline of personal mastery to connectivisim because it makes sense that in order for the individual to contribute to their network he or she first has to be an active learner, open to external opportunities to learn and continuously learn. From this putting aside any biases or barriers in order to better learn from others is necessary in accepting the critical elements associated with being open to the ideas of others in one’s network. In this way one builds a “connections,” develops a connectivism learning mindset, and contributes to team learning.