‘Education’ Category Archives

29
Aug

Strategic Planning Pt. 1

by Cathy in Education, Higher Education, Uncategorized, collaboration, systems Theory

I have been reviewing how best to strategic plan for higher education.  I have been involved in this process before at different places where I worked and planning is usually just second nature, an expectation if you will if you work as a manager, which I have for the last 15 years or so of my career.

First I would like to address, with little or authority or expertise to back this up, what is a strategic plan?  Well I went to the best authority on this subject that I know..Google.   And here is a bit of my findings from that search:

  • Strategic planning is an organization’s process of defining its strategy, or direction, and making decisions on allocating its resources to pursue this strategy, including its capital and people. Various business analysis techniques can be used in strategic planning, including SWOT analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats ), PEST analysis (Political, Economic, Social, and Technological), STEER analysis (Socio-cultural, Technological, Economic, Ecological, and Regulatory factors), and EPISTEL (Environment, Political, Informatic, Social, Technological, Economic and Legal).  en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_plan
  • A comprehensive plan for accomplishment in relation to stated goals and objectives. Ideally, the plan should cover multiple years; include targets for expected accomplishments; and propose specific performance measures used to evaluate progress towards those targets.
  • www.pewcenteronthestates.org/template_page.aspx
  • A forward-looking plan that aims to map out the means to achieve longer-term goals and to plan a response to unforeseen problems and opportunities.
  • www.mvp.cfee.org/en/glossary.html
  • A road map that outlines the long-term goals of an organization or program and details how these will be achieved by adopting specific strategies, approaches and methodologies. www.compass-malawi.com/cglossary.htm
  • Strategic plan – A document used by an organization to align its organization and budget structure with organizational priorities, missions, and objectives. According to requirements of GPRA, a strategic plan should include a mission statement, a description of the agency’s long-term goals and objectives, and strategies or means the agency plans to use to achieve these general goals and objectives. The strategic plan may also identify external factors that could affect achievement of long-term goals. [GAO] Strategic planning is a systematic method used by an organization to anticipate and adapt to expected changes. The IRM portion of strategic planning sets broad direction and goals for managing information and supporting delivery of services to customers and the public and identifies the major IRM activities to be undertaken to accomplish the desired agency mission and goals. [GAO] www.ichnet.org/glossary.htm

Strategic planning is not an individual process but a collaborative process, if not done collaboratively, taking into account the different voices of an organization’s constituents then what is the point? The essence of strategic planning it to ensure that all stakeholders of an institution are heard, their needs taken into account, weakness of the institution are considered and addressed, and that the institution is progressive and innovative.   In addition to this resources and resource needs of the institution are also considered in developing the strategies, how the institution will get where it needs to be, to ensure a solid foundation for success.

In these times of fast paced change it is still  essential to have a strategic planning process that provides for input, efficient and effective outputs, and as a communication tool to stakeholders regarding the activities of the institution.  It is also a tool of communication that provides for input on the direction that the institution is travelling ..is it truly on the right course?

Other reasons for strategic planning from others:

5 reasons for its use:

  1. Forces a look into the future and therefore provides an opportunity to influence the future, or assume a proactive posture.
  2. Provides better awareness of needs and of the facilities related issues and environment.
  3. Helps define the overall mission of the organization and focuses on the objectives.
  4. Provides a sense of direction, continuity, and effective staffing and leadership.
  5. Plugs everyone into the system and provides standards of accountability for people, programs, and allocated resources.  (retrieved from http://www.fpm.iastate.edu/worldclass/strategic_planning.asp )

All strategic planning deals with at least one of three key questions:

  1. “What do we do?”
  2. “For whom do we do it?”
  3. “How do we excel?”  (retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_plan )

Such a (strategic) plan will help you to:

  1. Take advantage of your company’s strengths.
  2. Eliminate or reduce your company’s weaknesses.
  3. Capitalize on opportunities and emerging trends.
  4. Take defensive steps to reduce threats facing your business.
  5. Bring together all your company’s resources, and direct them toward specific goals in areas such as sales growth, profit, productivity and service.
  6. Prioritize and document all the goals your company wants to accomplish over the next three to five years.
  7. Allocate resources and assign responsibilities.  (retrieved from http://www.sba.gov/idc/groups/public/documents/sba_homepage/pub_mp21.pdf)

Strategic planning enables you to answer the following questions:

  1. Who are we?
  2. What capacity do we have/what can we do?
  3. What problems are we addressing?
  4. What difference do we want to make?
  5. Which critical issues must we respond to?
  6. Where should we allocate our resources?/what should our priorities be?
  7. Only once these questions are answered, is it possible to answer the following:
  8. What should our immediate objective be? (See the section on Immediate Objectives)
  9. How should we organise ourselves to achieve this objective? (See the section on
  10. Internal Implications)
  11. Who will do what when?  (retrieved from http://www.civicus.org/new/media/Strategic%20Planning.pdf)

Information gathering is essential to strategic planning.  This may include archival data, the history of the institution, the budget, surveys, needs analysis, and surveys are part of the information needed to design a strategic plan.   Pre-work needs to occur prior to the strategic planning process taking place.  This means having a steering committee that determines who should be involved in the process, how the planning process will take place, and the timeline for the strategic planning process.

Strategic planning is information gathering built upon artifacts of the organization.   It is based upon these documents, budgets, conversations, and surveys that the teams is able to develop a sound analysis of the current status of the organization.    I will post the next part on the details of what to review in your strategic planning initiative.

  • Share/Bookmark
22
Aug

TWITTER!!!!!

by Cathy in Distance Education, Education, Education Technology, Uncategorized, Web 2.0, connectivism, web2.0 facebook twitter

It’s human nature perhaps to start taking things for granted, not dig below the surface and really start to understand how we can really use things to our advantage..such is the case for Twitter.  I tweet..lots of  things that interest me and I hope interest others.  I also tweet things I do ..particularly in Second Life but other areas of my life too.   I will probably tweet this blog too.

“Tweeting” is a form of microbloggin which is defined by Grosseck and Holutescu, (retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/2286799/Can-we-use-Twitter-for-educational-activities) as a Web2.0 technology, and a new form of blogging that let the users publish online brief text updates, usually less then 140-200 characters, sometimes images too.

Wikipedia provides the following defnition of microblogging:  is a passive broadcast medium in the form of blogging. A microblog differs from a traditional blog in that its content is typically much smaller, in both actual size and aggregate file size. A microblog entry could consist of nothing but a short sentence fragment, an image or embedded video.

As with traditional blogging, microbloggers post about topics ranging from the simple, such as “what I’m doing right now,” to the thematic, such as “sports cars.” Commercial microblogs also exist, to promote websites, services and/or products, and to promote collaboration within an organisation.

I have been tweeting religiously for over a year now and plan to do so for at least another six months or for as long as I believe Twitter serves a purpose for me professionally and personally. Twitter has served as the means through which I have created an online persona and identity and I feel it has served that purpose very well.

As I am going to continue to maintain this blog with a focus on certain tools that i use and I have applied the use of Twitter it seemed the logical choice for this posting.  Given that I decided to do some background research to see how others are applying the use of Twitter as educators and perhaps even contrast or compare that to how I use Twitter for information sharing.

My search brought up the blog of Alan Lew, dated 2007. So I checked on Alan to see if he was still using Twitter and he is, in fact, still communicating via Twitter.

I have summarized Alan’s suggestions for using Twitter:

1.  Communicating with students regarding homework, content, and summarizing meetings and conferences.
2.  Communication via a mobile phone
3.  Digital Reference services

Moving on in my search I next found Carol Cooper-Taylor’s 2008 blog with 50 ideas on using twitter.    I reviewed her blog and summarize her observations here:

Sharing links, be human, respond to others, highlight student activities, communicate with and encourage others in your institution to use Twitter to communicate, tweet in moderation, use twitter for instant meet ups, use twitter for facilitating a “backchannel” discussion in the classroom, and bring great minds together!

Ron Jones, in September of 2008, published the following in SearchEngine Watch magazine:

Using twitter to increase the discussion outside the classroom regarding the subject taught..(issue of the day/week?)
Other:  Instant feedback.

  • Track a conference or seminar.
  • Follow a professional or famous person.
  • Public notepad.
  • Writing assignments.
  • Grammar.
  • Maximizing the teachable moment.

The following researchers; Kerstin Borau Carsten Ullrich, Jinjin Feng, and Ruimin Shen, detail how twitter can be used in language learning to faciliate learning English.    In their article they noted that.. “ twitter was selected because it provides the Chinese students the opportunity to
practice the target language as well as their communicative and cultural competence.”

They identify microblogging as tools (that)  enable users to post short messages that are distributed within their community. Users can post messages from their mobile devices, a Web page, from Instant Messengers and desktop clients. The same channels are used for receiving messages.

They found the following three advantages of using Twitter in their classroom :

  • First, Twitter is easily accessibly from almost everywhere, so the students can practice at any time by sending and receiving messages either on the computer or the mobile phone. They can also decide how much time they spend reading and writing these messages. This is an essential feature for busy students.
  • Second, Twitter is suitable for any level of English because in writing the messages, the students can chose a topic and grammatical structure fitting their level.
  • Third, the use of Twitter as an online learning community can help to integrate students in the community who could not attend classroom.

In my research for this blog I found this wiki on Twitter… Twitter Fan Wiki. Which provides a warehouse for a variety of uses of Twitter and how to use Twitter.

In this  2007 article by Tseng, Song, Java and Finin the term microblogging is defined as  a new form of communication in which users can describe their current status in short posts distributed by instant messages, mobile phones, email or the Web.

In the August 16, 2010 US New and Report article the following uses of Twitter were identified:

1.      Using Twitter to post and answer questions during a lecture.
2.    Build networks in the professional world

3.    Develop marketing plans for businesses as a class project.

4.    Tweeting during commencement graduation and other events

5.    A way of connecting with other students in spite of off campus obligations

6.    A way of faculty connecting with other faculty on best practices in teaching

7.    “Digital faculty lounge” for connecting with other faculty

Together we are are just better, we learn from each other and we can bounce ideas off each other, as pointed out in Laura Walker’s 2009 blog on twitter.   This process allows users to reflect upon and improve their practice in the classroom.    Twitter can, and does for me at least, serve as my newspaper and new alert feed.  I check updates on my Twitter stream daily, this is how I learned of the Gulf Oil Spill and other national events.

Academ Hack’s blog from January 23rd, 2008 identifies the following academic uses for Twitter:

Facilitating classroom chatter that may or may not be subject related,  creating a sense of classroom community, understanding the global community, tracking a word, tracking a conference, following a professional, teaching grammar, rule based writing, maximizing a teachable moment, public notepad and writing assignments.

The online daily mewsmagaizine, Inside Higher Ed, has published 73 articles, blogs, etc., on Twitter, the most recent on August 19,2010, which relates to cell phone use.   This article presents a new initiative in which a university provided the following:

Georgia Gwinnett College employed when it decided to offer its more than 300 full- and part-time faculty members cell phones and encouraged them to respond to any calls or texts from students within 24 hours
Is this not great or what?  Gwinnett is taking a great leap off the cliff into the future ….hopefully not an initiative ahead of it’s time !!  I am including this here because Microblogging and smart phones go hand in hand!

On July 26, 2010 Business Week published an article on MBA schools and Twitter. With increased use of Twitter and Facebook schools are adding courses on Social Media at a record pace.    Twitter is being used by many companies for marketing, and special offers, one of my favorites to follow is Dell.

As I was doing research for this blog I came across Rachel Rueben’s The Use of Social Media in Higher Education for Marketing and Communications: A Guide for Professionals in Higher
Education at the following link: http://files.meetup.com/1491352/social-media-in-higher-education.pdf

In her guide she conveys that higher education is using Twitter as follows:

Of the 42 responders reporting to have an official Twitter account for their college, 50% of them say it is updated by their marketing/communications/public relations office. 50% use it to communicate with current students, and the other half use it to reach out to alumni. The majority update their status 1-4 times/week.

On May 20,2010, Hend Suliman Al-Khalifa, conveyed the following uses of Twitter in an eLearn Feature Article. (the results are based upon a Faculty Focus survey of 1900 academics)

  • collaboration (between colleagues, in group meetings)
  • communication
    • between teacher and student, student and student, teacher and parents
    • as a conference backchannel
    • for job posting
    • to circulate department news
  • tools
    • as a personal learning environment/personal learning network
    • as a virtual office
    • to post assignments
    • for language learning
    • for class participation
    • to track attendance
    • to stay abreast of current issues in a given field

In May of 2010 Pearson released the details of their survey on the use of Social Media in education and the findings are as follows:

  • Most faculty respondents (59%) have more than one social network account; nearly 25 percent have accounts on four or more social networks.

More findings can be found on the Pearson website. An article in the May 4,  2010 of Inside Higher Education summarizes the findings of this survey.   In a nutshell though we can speculate that professors and students are not quite the luddites that they appear to be, that there is a purpose for  twitter and other social networking tools in the classroom and in higher education.

The articles notes that:   In the open-ended portions of the survey, a substantial number of professors said they do not currently use social media tools but expect they will in the near future — meaning that by next year, the rate of usage will probably be even higher…. What this means to me is that if the utility of tools such as Twitter provide a convenience in communicating with students, assist them to meet the learning outcomes, and connecting with the faculty it will be implemented!  If Twitter provides a means of effectively conducting administrative tasks such as keeping attendance it will be effectively applied by faculty and used by students.

  • Share/Bookmark
16
May

The many faces of “openness”

by Cathy in Distance Education, Education, Open Courseware, Open Education Resources, Uncategorized, collaboration

Open Education Resources, Open Knowledge, Open Textbooks, Open Access, Open Source, Open Courseware,  these are all terms that define the revolution in how we access information, who has access, and what we access.  This revolution was driving by the technology that underpins the Internet and provides ubiquitous access to the world’s knowledge, information and resources.

I have spent that last couple of months discovering reports, websites, and journals that focus on “open” in the area of knowledge, education and information.  It was no surprise to me when the New Media Consortium cited Open Courseware as a short term trend in their 2010 Horizons report.   I have written about openness in previous blogs so I hope this posting does not prove redundant.

The history of providing information and access to information to the people has been well chronicled from the printing press forward.  Providing access to university course materials, academic lectures, learning objects and public domain materials via the web is, in my opinion another key milestone in our history.  The benefit is that giving the gift of knowledge to the world will allow for improvement in our lives, work and the world.  The mind of many is greater than the mind of one as other review, discuss and build upon our knowledge.

Providing access to courses via the MITs, Yale, Princeton, and others provides us all with a better perspective of what is excellent teaching, access to their courses to adopt (with proper credit of course) to improve ours. Access to this courseware has contributed to online institutions such as the University of the People and Peer to Peer University.

The purpose of open”ness” is not to give away the “work” of creating the open resources, but to provide open access to the knowledge base that is foundational to the creation of resources that improve learning, knowledge, and data. The analytical process of reviewing, synthesizing and presenting for discussion the work should not be free and should in some fashion be compensated by individuals and/or institutions.

Some of the reports, papers and research on open courseware I have found include:

  • New Media Consortium 2010 Horizon Report
  • Open Learn Research Report 2006-2008 William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
  • Giving Knowledge for Free–Centre for Research and Innovation
  • Open Educational Resources–Conversations in Cyberspace–Unesco
  • International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning
  • Open Educational Resources in Sub Sahara Africa–Examining Network Driven Models within the context of African Development
  • Open Educational Practice and resources –OLCOS Roadmap 2012
  • A Review of the Open Educational Resources Movement:   Achievement Challenges and New Opportunities February 2007
  • Good Intentions Improving the evidence base in support of sharing learning materials
  • Open Access in France. A State of the Art Report. 2010 report
  • Report of the Working Group on Open Access and Open Educational Resources

Each of the “open” terms I listed above have varying definitions some of these are as follows:

Open Access is concerned with making digital content available free of charge
without restriction [Public Library of Science, 2006]

OAI is a new paradigm in scholarly publishing. It aims to promote models that ensure free and unrestricted access to scholarly & research journals, (retrieved from http://www.openj-gate.com/Footer/About.aspx)

Another offshoot of the openness movement is Open Knowledge: any content, information or data that people are free to use, re-use and redistribute — without any legal, technological or social restriction. We detail exactly what openness entails in the Open Knowledge Definition. The main principles are:

  1. Free and open access to the material
  2. Freedom to redistribute the material
  3. Freedom to reuse the material
  4. No restriction of the above based on who someone is (e.g. their nationality) or their field of endeavour (e.g. commercial or non-commercial)

Open education resources:  can be defined as free and open digital publications of high quality materials organized as courses that include lectures, related reading materials, snapshots of discussions, assignments, evaluations, etc. Access to these resources radically breaks down the barriers to quality education and allows everyone to access course material that is prepared and evaluated by expert.  (retrieved from http://www.knowledgecommission.gov.in/downloads/documents/wg_open_course.pdf)

Open Source:describes practices in production and development that promote access to the end product’s source materials. Some consider open source a philosophy, others consider it a pragmatic methodology. Subsequently, a new, three-word phrase “open source software” was born to describe the environment that the new copyright, licensing, domain, and consumer issues created.

Southern Europe Open Access to Science Information

Journals:

Directory of Open Access Journals We define open access journals as journals that use a funding model that does not charge readers or their institutions for access. From the BOAI definition [1] of “open access” we take the right of users to “read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles” as mandatory for a journal to be included in the directory.

Revues.org is a portal of journals in the humanities and social open to journals wishing to publish online the full text. Revues.org is a complete e-publishing platform and built a space dedicated to the promotion of research, open access publishing tens of thousands of scientific papers.

Open J Gate:  is an electronic gateway to global journal literature in open access domain. Launched in 2006, Open J-Gate is the contribution of Informatics (India) Ltd to promote OAI. Open J-Gate provides seamless access to millions of journal articles available online. Open J-Gate is also a database of journal literature, indexed from 6787 open access journals, with links to full text at Publisher sites.

The Open Education Journal is an Open Access online journal which publishes original research articles, reviews and short articles in all areas of education research and on contemporary education issues and learning, including special education.

I will not attempt to enumerate the many institutions which offer opencourseware. There are many sites which do this much better than I could.  For example the blogThe .Edu Toolbox aims to be your one stop tool shop for all the resources you need to create the blueprint and build an impressive foundation in learning.

The OpenCourseWare Consortium is a free and open digital publication of high quality educational materials, organized as courses. The OpenCourseWare Consortium is a collaboration of more than 200 higher education institutions and associated organizations from around the world creating a broad and deep body of open educational content using a shared model.

Connexions is: a place to view and share educational material made of small knowledge chunks called modules that can be organized as courses, books, reports, etc. Anyone may view or contribute:

  • authors create and collaborate
  • instructors rapidly build and share custom collections
  • learners find and explore content

The International Institute of Managment IIM;

The IIM Open Courseware (OCW) experiment project provides free access to some of IIM’s most popular educational materials.  The IIM’s OCW:

  • Does not require that participants register
  • Does not provide access to IIM faculty
  • Does not grant degrees or certificates
  • Allow free use to all, as long as you provide copyright reference to “International Institute of Management www.iim-edu.org ” with and active hyperlink (for online use)

Of course there are those colleges and universities known for providing opencourseware such as MIT, Yale, Tufts, John Hopkins, as well as companies such as Novell.

Over the last several years the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation have invested heavily in Open Educational Resources.  They stated that their intent was to catalyze universal access to and use of high-quality academic content on a global scale.

Lori Goetsh wrote in March 2010 that “open-access” repositories – that is,  (are) sites where scholarship and research are made freely available over the Internet. She went on to state that, “Open access helps achieve the fundamental mission of the academy – to disseminate knowledge…” (Goetsch, 2010, Change Magazine).

Is “openness” a disruptive innovation as put forth by Terry Anderson and Bridgette McConkey in the 2009 article Development of Disruptive Open Access Journals in The Canadian Journal of Higher Education.  Essentially the answer to that is yes.  Providing prevalent access to learning objects, course materials, and an understanding of how courses are designed (making education open and not a closed process).   Opening scholarly journals provides the authors with widespread access to their research allowing for a diverse review of their work, increased collaboration and further opportunities for collaborative research.  All of this allows for further innovations, innovations which will improve how we live, what we know, and how we work together…used appropriately ‘openness” and transparency improves our world, our lives, and the lives of future generations.

  • Share/Bookmark
6
May

Mulling over the elements of quality in online education

by Cathy in Distance Education, Education, Education Technology, online learning

Anyone who has taught or managed an online program or taken an online class has their own definition of what quality is in online education.  Because I have taken on line courses, managed an online program, and been a student in online courses I have defined some of my own conclusions on what are the essential elements of quality in an online program.

Some quality elements are obvious others are not and are even less than tangible and may not pay off until the student successfully completes his/her program of study.   In this presentation I have identified such things as assessment, engagement, interaction, time on task, and learning outcomes among others.

What follows are those elements that I have identified as essential to the quality of an online course or program. One essential element is the ease of access to the course, the content and the service and support for the course that are required for student success.   The course is designed or structured in such a way that engagement by the student with the content, the instructor and other students is facilitated and supported.

In addition to these elements the student is encouraged to provide insight by investigating external content and materials, fully utilizing the technology, seeking out student support services and library resources, and engaging with the institution.

The course provides an opportunity for the student to:

  • Think critically
  • Expand his/her knowledge by reviewing and demonstrating knowledge of the internal content and accessing appropriate external content
  • Stretch his/her ability  to learn in a variety of ways
  • Collaborate, connect with and network with a diverse group of learners

The learning is tested if possible via authentic assessment.  Authentic assessment is a form of assessment in which students are asked to perform real-world tasks that demonstrate meaningful application of essential knowledge and skills — Jon Mueller

Authentic assessment presents students with real-world challenges that require them to apply their relevant skills and knowledge. (retrieved from http://www.funderstanding.com/content/authentic-assessment 5/6/2010)

Authentic assessment is an evaluation process that involves multiple forms of performance measurement reflecting the student’s learning, achievement, motivation, and attitudes on instructionally-relevant activities. Examples of authentic assessment techniques include performance assessment, portfolios, and self-assessment.” American Library Association

Feedback is consistent with the student able to monitor his / her progress.  Feedback may also come from peers and peer review.

An online course should be designed in such a way that it encourages academic integrity.  Facutly can model ethics and integrity as well present core values which are the fundamental tenets of core values.

The course design and the hallmark of the course includes a design which facilitates the relationship between faculty and students and allows for the student to have access to the faculty if needed.

The course provides for a method of communication in which the student can engage in a dialogue with the faculty regarding issues and concerns regarding academic progress.

The student has access to tutors and other student support services in order to sufficiently learn the materials confidently and be successful.

The course is designed in such a way that expectations and outcomes are clear.    The learning outcomes are based upon a taxonomy such as Blooms which integrates the three domains:

  • Cognitive: mental skills (Knowledge)
  • Affective: growth in feelings or emotional areas (Attitude)
  • Psychomotor: manual or physical skills (Skills)

Each domain is divided into categories  and it is these catogories that provide the fundamental definition of the learning outcomes:

Cognitive:

  • Knowledge
  • Comprehension:
  • Application:
  • Analysis:
  • Synthesis:
  • Evaluation
  • personal values/opinions,

Affective:

Domain Attributes: interpersonal relations, emotions, attitudes, appreciations, and values id

accepts attempts challenges defends disputes joins judges
contributes praises questions shares supports volunteers

(retrieved from : http://eduscapes.com/tap/topic69.htm  5/6/2010)

Content is linked to activities and support the student learning the materials necessary to successfully achieve the stated outcomes.

Learning outcomes are clearly stated and are linked to the purpose of the course.  The required course purpose is clearly linked to the outcomes of the course.

The content of the course is current and meets industry and professional standards.  Resources are creative, innovative and dynamic.

Faculty demonstrate competency  and comfort with the use of technology in distance education for ease in communication, accessing content and course materials and connect with the student at all levels.   Student also demonstrate competency in the use of technology, have access to technical support and have several methods and points of contact with the institution, of communicating with each other, and faculty

Faculty presence in the course is demonstrated by feedback in a timely manner.

Faculty engagement with course content and with students occurs daily in the first two weeks of the semester.

A definition of “at risk students for dropping out” exists and those students receive additional support.

Faculty are trained in instructional design, the use of the learning management system and other technology,  and have received instructional design support.

The Learning Management System provides a structure or framework for course management, the appropriate delivery of content, grading, communication and assessment. The LMS is flexible enough to provide a platform for creativity and innovation by faculty and opportunities for students to be self directed in their learning and to create a personal learning network.

The course lends itself to individual and group self reflection activities.  The course, if applicable, builds on knowledge that student already has developed, encourages the student to provide input on projects, discussions and activities.  In other words new learning, and new knowledge is developed upon an existing foundation of knowledge.

To ensure quality and continuous quality improvement courses should be reviewed, by peers and external reviewers on a periodic basis.  These reviews should be conducted based upon the elements of an objective rubric designed to survey the essential elements of the course such as use of technology, feedback, communication, and interaction.


  • Share/Bookmark
26
Mar

Reports, plans, educational technology, broadband, millenials an interesting mix

by Cathy in Distance Education, Education, Education Technology, Future, Higher Education, Uncategorized, University, online learning

Several reports or plans related to higher education, education technology, and online learning have been released in the last several months that indicate changes in how students learn, how they access their learning materials, and how that content is delivered.  In addition to this I will also give an overview of Millenials from the Pew Research Center.

In January 2010 the Sloan Consortium released their report on online education.  This report indicates that online experienced a growth of 17% in the last year.  Students in online classes comprise 25% of all students enrolled in higher education today, or 4.6 million students.    This 29 pages report found on the Sloan Consortium website presented the following information:

  • This report serves to strengthen the theory behind the economy and enrollments in education in general and now provides a direct link between  online education and enrollments.
  • Despite the growth in online education this platform continues to struggle to be seen as a strategic part of the long term planning for baccalaureate granting institution and public institutions.  In addition to this faculty acceptance of online/distance education is stagnant.
  • Overwhelming the student in online courses and programs are undergraduate who make up 82% of the students enrolled.

The issue of retention in online is also addressed in this report.   The question “Is retention in online harder than in  traditional face to face courses?”  This was administered via a survey of Chief Academic Officers which indicated that most were neutral on the question.  However those who agree outnumber of those who disagree.  Specifics on why this perception exists were not asked or provided.

Another report which was released by the US Department of Education is the:  Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies.  I previously blogged on this report however what this report indicates is that online learning, can,  under certain conditions,  provide better learning experiences to students.

Another study with trends to watch in distance education is theK-12 Online Learning reportfrom the Sloan Consortium. this 37 page report, based upon a survey administered to over 10,000 school districts, with a5/4% return of valid surveys,  published in January 2009 indicates that:

Most significant in regards to this report is the growth in online education which is illustrated by:

The overall number of K-12 students engaged in online courses in 2007-2008, is
estimated at 1,030,000. This represents a 47% increase since 2005-2006.

Major findings were that the majority (63.1 %) of the public school districts in the United States had at least one student enrolled in either a fully online or blended course; that a majority of administrators in these districts predicted that enrollments would grow by approximately twenty percent over the next two years; and that the total number enrolled in online or blended learning courses was estimated at approximately 700,000 public school K-12 students.

Most districts indicated that they anticipate growth in online:  A majority of the respondents anticipated growth (66.3% of districts expect growth in their fully online course enrollments and 61.2% expect growth in their blended enrollments). Districts predict that on average the number of students taking online courses will grow by 22.8 percent over the next two years.

Respondents indicate that the following are the major reasons why online education has grown and will continue to grow:

These results indicate that the perceived importance of online learning related mostly to student needs as follows:

1. Meeting the needs of specific groups of students
2. Offering courses not otherwise available at the school
3. Offering Advanced Placement or college-level courses
4. Permitting students who failed a course to take it again
5. Reducing scheduling conflicts for students

The respondents also indicated the following concerns regarding online courses:

1. Concerns about course quality
2. Course development and/or purchasing costs
3. Concerns about receiving funding based on student attendance for online   and/or blended/hybrid education courses
4. The need for teacher training

Another report that is related to online learning in K-12 is the Keeping Pace report which provides the following details:

The Keeping Pace 2009 report:

  • Provides a national “snapshot” of the state of online learning as of fall 2009.
  • Discusses original data categorized by key issues such as funding, teaching, and accountability, including analysis and recommendations.
  • Presents program profiles from a cross-section of program types, including state-led and district-led, supplemental and full-time, charter schools, and both synchronous and asynchronous programs.
  • Provides state profiles of K-12 online learning for most states, divided into southeastern, northeastern, central, and western regions.
  • Identifies key issues in online learning, building on the data gathered through the development of the program and state profiles.
  • Features a Notes from the Field section with in-depth examination of important new issues in online learning from national experts.
TheKeeping Pacereport provides further details on the growth of distance education in the K-12 arena:

Keeping Pace estimates the number of full-time online students at about                        175,000.  States with the largest numbers of full-time online students include                 Arizona, Ohio, Minnesota,  Colorado, Washington, California, and Pennsylvania.

The Keeping Pace report provided an overview of several types of online learning programs but which was of specific interest to me was the following note regarding university led online K12 programs:

University-run K-12 online programs have often been
overlooked but are another component of the online learning
landscape. Online programs that have emerged from previous
independent study programs of post-secondary institutions
tend to have relatively low levels of teacher involvement.

Available via the US Department of Education is the report:  Evaluation of the Enhancing Education Through Technology Program: Final Report.  This report provides the following details on the federal program that supported improving student academic achievement in elementary and secondary schools through the use of educational technology.

This reports indicates a continued upward trend in Internet access by schools with 63% of teachers indicating that they had  high speed Internet access in their classrooms.   No gaps were noted between student access to computers in these schools however some gaps were noted between student access to laptops in these institutions.

Another report which provides information on significant trends in the online market in general which may pertain to distance/online education is Morgan Stanley’s Mobile Internet Report.

Covering 8 key themes regarding the Mobile Internet which are:

1)  Wealth Creation / Destruction is Material in New Computing Cycles – Now in
Early Innings of Mobile Internet Cycle, the 5th Cycle of Last Half Century.

Wealth Creation / Destruction Is Material in New Computing Cycles – History shows that massive technology changes typically shift dynamics between incumbents / attackers, creating winners / losers. A handful of incumbents (like Apple, Google, Amazon.com, and Skype) appear especially well positioned for the mobile Internet, the fifth new cycle of the last half century.
2) Mobile Ramping Faster than Desktop Internet Did and Will Be Bigger Than
Most Think – 5 Trends Converging (3G + Social Networking + Video + VoIP +
Impressive Mobile Devices).

…the explosive Apple iPhone / iTouch ramp shows why usage of mobile devices on IPbased networks should surprise to the upside for years to come. As 3G adoption hits inflection points in many markets, consumers are flocking to a broad range of IPbased  usage models over powerful mobile Internet enabled devices. We predict that smartphones will outship the global notebook + netbook market in 2010E and out-ship the global PC market (notebook + netbook +
desktop) by 2012E.
3) Apple Leading in Mobile Innovation + Impact, for Now – Depth of App
Ecosystems + User Experience + Pricing Will Likely Determine Long-Term
Winners.

Near term, Apple is driving the platform change to mobile computing and leading in user experience. Its mobile ecosystem (iPhone + iTouch + iTunes + accessories + services) market share and impact should surprise on the upside for at least the next 1-2 years. Longer term, Google Android’s open operating system (combined with clever device manufacturers), emerging markets competition, and carrier limitations may pose challenges to Apple’s market share upside. RIM may maintain the enterprise lead, thanks to its installed base, but the long-term outlook is challenging.
4) Game-Changing Communications / Commerce Platforms (Social Networking +
Mobile) Emerging Very Rapidly.

Improvements in social networking and mobile computing platforms (led by Facebook + Apple ecosystems) are fundamentally changing how people communicate with each other and how developers, advertisers, and vendors can reach consumers. Mobile devices are evolving as remote controls for continually expanding types of real-time, cloud-based services – including emerging location-based services – creating opportunities and dislocations, empowering consumers in
unprecedented and transformative ways.
5) Growth / Monetization Roadmaps Provided by Japan Mobile + Desktop Internet.

Mobile Internet development in Japan and desktop Internet business
models provide significant runways for monetizing the mobile Internet through online commerce, paid services, and advertising; data access likely will continue to lose relative revenue share in the mobile Internet ecosystem.
6) Massive Data Growth Driving Carrier / Equipment Transitions.

Global mobile IP traffic is likely to grow 66x by 2013E (with 130% CAGR), per Cisco. Increasing 3G /smartphone penetration and emerging usage models (such as video / audio streaming) will stress carrier wireless networks. Carriers may be able to address the surge via capacity upgrades and offloading to Wi-Fi. Tiered data pricing (speed, quantity) will likely be critical to long-term revenue growth.

7) Compelling Opportunities in Emerging Markets.

Emerging markets have enormous potential for mobile Internet user growth, owing to low fixed-line telephone / broadband penetration + already vibrant mobile value added services. We expect 3G inflection points to be 2-3 years away, depending on the individual markets.
8) Regulators Can Help Advance / Slow Mobile Internet Evolution.

Inherent conflicts between the wants / needs of consumers and those of incumbent TMT providers are creating challenges for regulators.

While there is not much in the report that is education related specifically the upward trend in the use of mobile technology is an indication that users may demand the delivery of content:  text, video, and audio via their handheld devices.

The Pew Research Center provides a wealth of information which may assist educators to determine where the use of technology is trending by users.  A significant report on the “Millennial Generation”was recently released by them. The report defines the millenial generation as that age group which born after 1980 – the first generation to come of age in the new millennium

75% of the respondents, aged 18 – 29 years of age in late 2009 when the survey was conducted indicated that they have a profile on a Social Networking site.  Another significant factor that impacts education decisions of this age group is the large unemployment rate..nearly 37% of this age group indicate that they are currently unemployed.  (pp 10)

When it comes to education the survey found;

Millennials are more highly educated when ranked with other generations at comparable ages. More than half of Millennials have at least some college education (54%), compared with 49% of Gen Xers, 36% of Boomers and 24% of the Silent generation when they were ages 18 to 28. Millennials, when compared with previous generations at the same age, also are more likely to have completed high school.

Millenials are more likely to point to technology as a factor that distinguishes them from other generations.  Chapter 4, page 25 of the report covers the technical use of this generation from social media to mobile phone use.   The report states, they are more likely to have their own social networking profiles, to connect to the Internet wirelessly when away from home or work, and to post video of themselves online.
.. a majority of them are likely to use their cell phones for texting.

The following is also noted:

Millennials who have attended college are more likely than those who have no college experience to be online, use social networking sites, watch and post video online, connect to the Internet wirelessly, and send and receive text messages. Younger Millennials are more likely than older Millennials use the internet and social networking sites, and to have sent or received a larger number of text messages in the past 24 hours.  (page 25)

Millenials are used and in face may expect the use of wireless connectivity as indicated by the survey:

Far more Millennials who have attended college than those without college experience connect to the internet wirelessly: 74% who have been to college use wireless connections away from home or work, compared with 47% of those who have not attended college. The question did not specifically mention use of wireless connections at school. However, these findings likelyreflect to some degree the general situation on many campuses, where wireless connectivity is ubiquitous.

The use of a cell phone is common for this generation the results indicate that:

More than eight-in-ten (86%) adults now have a cell phone, including majorities across all age groups. Millennials are somewhat more likely than all other age groups to have a cell phone: 94% have one, as do 90% of Gen Xers and 89% of Boomers.

Given these statistics  as we design learning programs, campuses and other learning environments the needs of not only Gen Xers, Baby Boomers but also ensure that these programs and learning experiences are geared towards the needs of the millenials..the worlds is moving forwards in the advanced use of technology..and we can’t turn back the hands of time..we can only move ahead.   It is likely that their experiences during this recession will also influence their approach to education, the choices they make and their need for technology to access their education via online or distance delivery.

The next plan to watch is the National Broadband Plan. This plan is broken into seven market segments which includes Education, Public Safety, Government Performance, Civic Engagement, Health Care, Energy and Environment.   According to the website the plan achieves the following:

The National Broadband Plan lays out a bold roadmap to America’s                        future. These initiatives will stimulate economic growth, spur job                            creation, and boost our capabilities in education, healthcare, homeland                    security and more.

The plan was created by the Federal Communications Commission as a result of a series of workshops, seminars and a public forums.

Specifically attributed to education is the following:

  • Education. Broadband can enable improvements in public education through e-learning and online content, which can provide more personalized learning opportunities for students. Broadband can also facilitate the flow of information, helping teachers, parents, schools and other organizations to make better decisions tied to each student’s needs and abilities. To those ends, the plan includes recommendations to:
    • Improve the connectivity to schools and libraries by upgrading the FCC’s E-Rate program to increase flexibility, improve program efficiency and foster innovation by promoting the most promising solutions and funding wireless connectivity to learning devices that go home with students.
      • Accelerate online learning by enabling the creation of digital content and learning systems, removing regulatory barriers and promoting digital literacy.
      • Personalize learning and improve decision–making by fostering adoption of electronic educational records and improving financial data transparency in education.

There are several recommendations under each category listed above however those specific to education can be found here on this website. the focus of the report seems to be implementing expanded broadband services will support an infrastructure which will increase student access to online education.  Part of this initiative will include teacher and student training to better use the technology that they have available.   This plan will put into place minimum standards which schools and libraries will have to measure their progress in achieving adequate services to their students and patrons.   I can’t even begin to address the scope of this report but if you relate to any of those categories at the very least that on it ‘s own warrants a review of the initiatives detailed in this report.

In January of 2010 the New Media Consortium presented it’s annual Horizons report on  emerging initiatives in technology in education.   This report gives an overview of technologies to watch in the short to long term.  These include; mobile technology, opencourseware/open content, electronic books, simple augmented reality, gesture based computing, visual data analysis.

As I have illustrated with the above reports it may seem that technology, virtual learning environments, and new technologies are driving how we learn.  However our access to those learning materials, as well economy and generational factors also play a significant role as indicated by the data and information it seems that may very well be the case.

References
Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2009). Learning on Demand Online Education in the United States 2009 (Rep.). Sloan Consortium.

Horizons 2010 (Rep.). (2010, January 5). Retrieved March 24, 2010, from New Media Consortium website: http://wp.nmc.org/horizon2010/chapters/technologies/#0

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies (Rep.). US Department of Education.

Mobile Internet The Report (Rep.). (2009). Morgan Stanley.
National Broadband Plan Connecting America (Rep.). (2010). Federal Communications Commission.

National Education Technology Plan 2010 (Rep.). (2010). Office of Educational Technology Department of Education.

Piccianno, A., & Seaman, J. (2008). K-12 Online Learning A 2008 Survey of of US School District Administrators (Rep.). Sloan Consortium.

Taylor, P., & Teeter, S. (Eds.). (2009). The Millenials. Confident, connected, open to change (Rep.). Pew Research Center.

Watson, J., Gemin, B., Ryan, J., Wicks, M., Powell, A., Scantland, A., & Young, J. (n.d.). Keeping Pace with K-12 Online Learning (Rep.) (S. Bullock, J. Fitzpatrick, K. Loughrey, L. Pape, M. Revenaugh, T. Hitchcock, et al., Eds.).

  • Share/Bookmark
6
Mar

Retention in online education

by Cathy in Distance Education, Education, Higher Education, University, online learning

This is the blog I have been wanting to research, to think about and to write for some time..frankly this one just seemed too tough to tackle in many respects and that is how to address retention in online education.   There are just too many factors to consider and given that where does one even start?

I suppose a definition of retention would be fundamental as a starting point.    It is important to undertand that distance education via the web and using mobile technology is still a relatively new initiative in education.  The schools I have worked at or attended as a student did not start implementing online classes until the late 1990′s early 2000′s, given that it is still in the early stages of development.

Back in those early days of web based course you would hear about or experience courses that were not developed, faculty who failed to communicate with students and experience a confusion on how to access support services.  Much has changed today as educators and institutions understand that only fully developed courses should be put on line, that distance education students need access to support services, and that integration of media can enhance the content of an online course.

However in  spite of that there are several trends which have contributed to the phenomenal growth of distance education via the Internet.  This includes an increased demand for courses and program by those students who would not otherwise have access to educational opportunities via other means.

Retention can mean one thing to students, another to faculty, another to administrators and quite another to those who are responsible for funding programs and providing student financial aid. What this means is that the solutions, research, and even those we survey regarding the issue of retention may have different outcomes all coming from different perspectives.

Without any substantive research to back this I would propose that retention means, to students, successful educational goal completion.  Now what this means to student could be entirely different than what we  assume it to mean. This could mean the he/she accessed some components of a course for informational purposes, career purposes, or personal reasons and did not even feel it necessary to complete the course. It could mean course completion but no reason to continue enrolling in courses, or taking more than one course but not advancing to a degree, and finally degree completion.  For faculty this could mean successful completion of a course, successful advancement to the next level of the course, and/or successful degree completion.   For administration and funders this means successful completion of a course or degree advancement. In addition to this funders want to see and loans paid back ie) a low default rate on financial aid.    All have in mind that this course, courses or program will provide the student with personal fulfillment and/or the tools necessary to be a contributing member of society, having meaning work, and make a living wage.

With all of these differing perspectives on retention how does one measure it and determine what strategies should be in place to achieve the aim of improving retention of students distance education programs and courses.

There are several strategies that have been identified in the research.   The study conducted by Finnegan, Lee and Morris (2008) indicates that those students who successfully completed their courses spent more time on task (as indicated by the US DOE meta-analysis of distance education) more time interacting with others, and participated in online discussions more frequently,  (Lawler, 2007Sutton, Nora, 2008; Tello, 2008). While this time on task is critical it is also important to note that students would also withdraw or drop if they felt the work required of them in an online course exceeded that of the face to face course or required more reading. (Lawlor,2008)   These findings indicate the delicate balance that needs to take place in evaluating content for an online course, not enough does not engage the student or contributes towards achieving the outcomes, too much and the student feels that he/she is in a correspondence course and “reading” too much. (Lawler,2008)

The faculty can access Web 2.0 tools at little or no cost to supplant the text based content of a course.  He/she can use voice threads, Youtube, or some of these video related tools from Web2Go20 .   I will provide a brief overview of these sites, however I cannot vouch for their reliability or safety of use this is for informational purposes only.  I suggest you review the Terms of Service before using and give a few trial runs to ensure that they will meet your needs.

If, for whatever reason you choose to not use your Learning Management System to warehouse your videos I am providing the following here:

Flixtime: turns your photos and videos into stunning and unique videos in just minutes!             Sign-up for a free account, and upload your images, videos and music. Then, sit back             and watch your masterpiece come together!

For sharing videos with a distributed group you may want to check outSynchTube.
synchtube allows you to create rooms to share synchronzied YouTube videos.
This means everyone in the room is viewing the same video at the same time!                       The built in chat allows you to even discuss the best parts, or share other videos.
Watch videos with friends, or even DJ music with the social playlists — it is up to you

Masher looks like another great site to provide a “mash up” of your videos, photos, music or audio recordings.

According to their site Masher isa site which let’s you easily create a video by mashing together video clips, music tracks and photos. So you can create a video to brag about your holiday, to wish your friend happy birthday, or to show off your creative side. Whatever you have to say, a video speaks a squillion words, so get mashing! Masher was created in 2008 and has an incredible built-in library of footage and music that you can use in your creations for free. The free video library archive features thousands of high quality clips, including footage from CBS News, BBC Motion Gallery, China Central Television, NHK Japan, Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Rip Curl, Huntley Archives and many more.

These tools and many others like them can make your course development easier, allow you to move away from text based content to video and audio, and finally break that umbilical chord to the publisher’s power points.

These tools can also provide for greater student to student interaction, student to faculty interaction, and student to content interaction. (Tello, Louis, 2008; Lawlor, D., 2008;Disalvio, P. 2008) These interactions have also been demonstrated to be essential to student retention in the review of the literature and are also standards reviewed using the Quality Matters Rubric®.

Online education is susceptible to those factors that contribute to dropping out in face to face or traditional education as well as additional factors such as discomfort with the technology, not having a solid technical infrastructure to support online education and falling victim to the assumption that because it is on line it will be easier than a face to face class.  Online education is not easier than face to face, however it should be just as hard, with consideration for the fact that much of it is written and therefore requires the time necessary to read and absorb content.  Online education also requires a very structured approach on the part of the faculty, it does not provide the faculty who designs and teaches the course with “free time, ” because it is  online.

Faculty who are intent  upon doing an outstanding job will recognize that he/she almost needs to log into the course daily, to be consistently present in the course.  The course will be designed from start to finish and will allow for little variance from that structure throughout the semester.  However the course will be designed with few deadlines for the student so that it will meet his/her needs for flexibility which is probably one of the primary reasons why he/she enrolled in the course in the first place.

The research demonstrates that student to faculty communication is a key factor in student retention.  This means that the faculty has set office hours, defines timeliness when he or she will respond to emails (sometimes 24 hours which means logging in to the course and checking email on the weekend), and timely feedback on assignment within 3 days, (quite a challenge if the course has 100 students or more)(Drouin,  2008; Tello, 2008; Lawlor, D, 2007; Finnegan, Morris, Lee 2008).

The research also reveals those student related factors that institutions may or may not be able to address.  These include work related demands, time management,  and technical issues. (Lawlor, D 2007; Finnegan, Morris, Lee, 2007; Disalvio, P., 2008; Lorenzetti, P 2005)

This is the first in a series of reviews of research and literature I intend to do in order to aggregate the recent findings, compile best practices and design strategies that can be implemented to improve student success.

Literature Review
Angelino, L. “A Case Study on Graduates from an Online Certificate Program and Their Experiences Related to Engagement Practices.” Diss. Clemson University, 2009. Print.
Disalvio, Phillip. “SETONWORLDWIDE: A CASE STUDY OF STUDENT SUCCESS.” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks; 13.3 (2009): 29-36. Print.
Drouin, Michelle. “HE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STUDENTS’ PERCEIVED SENSE OF COMMUNITY AND SATISFACTION, ACHIEVEMENT, AND RETENTION IN AN ONLINE COURSE.” Quarterly Review of Distance Education 9.30 (2008): 267-84. Print.
Finnegan, Catherine, Libby Morris, and Sz-Shyan Wu. “Redicting Retention in Online General Education Courses.” American Journal of Distance Education 19.1 (2005): 23-36. Print.
Hannum, Wallace H., Matthew Irvin, Pui-Wa Lie, and Thomas Farmer. “Effectiveness of Using Learner-centered Principles on Student Retention in Distance Education Courses in Rural Schools.” Distance Education 29.3 (2008): 211-29. Print.
Lorenzetti, Jennifer. “Secrets of Online Success: Lessons from the Community Colleges.” Distance Education Report 1 July 2005: 3-6. Print.
McCracken, Holly. “BEST PRACTICES IN SUPPORTING PERSISTENCE OF DISTANT EDUCATION STUDENTS THROUGH INTEGRATED WEB-BASED SYSTEMS.” Journal of College Student Retention 10.1 (2008): 65-91. Print.
Morris, Libby, and Catherine Finnegan. “BEST PRACTICES IN PREDICTING AND ENCOURAGING STUDENT PERSISTENCE AND ACHIEVEMENT ONLINE.” Journal of College Student Retention 10.1 (2008): 55-64. Print.
Porta Merida, Sandra. “Online Learning Success: Underlying Constructs Affecting Student Attrition.” Diss. Lynn University, 2009. Print.
Snyder, Blanca. “TECHNOLOGY AND HIGHER EDUCATION: THE IMPACT OF E-LEARNING APPROACHES ON STUDENT ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTIONS AND PERSISTENCE.” Journal of College Student Retention 10.1 (2008): 3-19. Print.
Sutton, Stephen C., and Amaury Nora. “AN EXPLORATION OF COLLEGE PERSISTENCE FOR STUDENTS ENROLLED IN WEB-ENHANCED COURSES: A MULTIVARIATE ANALYTIC APPROACH.” Journal of College Student Retention 10.1 (2008): 21-37. Print.
  • Share/Bookmark
10
Feb

Learning theories and Second Life (r)

by Cathy in Connectivisim, Education, Education Technology, Learning theory, Second Life, learner centered, virtual worlds

In November of 2009-January 2010 I conducted a survey, this survey asked which learning theory educators applied in designing their courses or activities in Second Life.  A list of commonly applied learning theories in Virtual Worlds/Second Life was provided and the respondents were allowed to leave comments.  Seventy three percent indicated that they apply experiential learning theory to their Second Life learning projects, 52% indicated that they apply social learning, and 63% indicated they design collaborative learning theory in to their learning activities (multiple responses were allowed), in addition to this the written comments indicated that connectivism was also applied.

In order to understand how various learning theories can be applied in the virtual environment or world one must first understand the context in which these activities occur. Virtual is defined as:
Wikipedia defines virtual as:”that which is not real” but may display the salient qualities of the real. Increasingly though, virtual is being used to identify those activities which occur “online” or on the Internet and this includes “virtual worlds.”

Virtual worlds are those  three dimensional online “holistic systems” which provide for a platform for online ‘human activities via an avatar..” These holistic systems provide a for a 3 dimensional environment for communication, creation of communities, creative expression, navigation, participation by many, and social networking.  Holistic is defined as:

Holism (from ὅλος holos, a Greek word meaning all, entire, total) is the idea that all the properties of a given system (physical, biological, chemical, social, economic, mental, linguistic, etc.) cannot be determined or explained by its component parts alone. Instead, the system as a whole determines in an important way how the parts behave. (holistic, 2/10/10).

Virtual worlds: is a genre of online community that often takes the form of a computer-based simulated environment, through which users can interact with one another and use and create objects[1]. Virtual worlds are intended for its users to inhabit and interact, and the term today has become synonymous with interactive 3D virtual environments, where the users take the form of avatars visible to others graphically[2]. These avatars are usually depicted as textual, two-dimensional, or three-dimensional graphical representations, although other forms are possible[3] (auditory[4] and touch sensations for example). (virtual worlds, 2/10/10)

Other terms used to define virtual worlds includes those of immersive, virtual reality, 3 dimensional,

Learners in Second Life are adults, first and foremost the recognition of andragogy must be defined, Andragogy is the term used most often to define the characteristics of adult learners.  These include:

Learners must balance life responsibilities with the demands of learning.

Learner are autonomous and self directed.

Learners have a tremendous amount of life experiences.  They need to connect the                  learning to their knowledge base.  They must recognize the value of the learning.

Learners are goal oriented and know for what purpose they are learning new information.

Learning is self-initiated and tends to last a long time.

Adults as learners take on a great deal of responsibility for learning themselves.  This greatly alters the role of teacher in the learning environments in general but virtual worlds specifically.

Collaborative learning or cooperative learning was another learning theory cited by respondents as most often applied to the design of the learning program in Second Life.  The lecture, listening and note taking lives along side other processes are are based in student discussion and active work with the course content/ materials.  The design of the course is to ensure an intellectual experience for the students and emergent learning processes are identified..however key to the learning process is the discussion. (Macgregor and Smith, 1992, retrieved from http://learningcommons.evergreen.edu/pdf/collab.pdf)

The interactive environment of Second Life lends itself very well to the application of collaborative learning.  The benefits of this learning theory is viewed as freeing up professors from lecturing and allow them time to collaborate with students, enables students to collaborate with other independent of time and geography and provides a new mode for the production of knowledge.   (Tapscott, Don and Williams, Anthony, Educause Review 2010, 45, 1, January 2010)

Those examples of collaborative learning include any activities in which students work together to achieve a common goal.  These learning opportunities maybe well suited to role play, creation of learning objects, and communication activities.   Second Life provides many tools which may support the student in achieving the learning outcomes of a collaborative learning activity these include the communication tools, any activity in which they can create content in world, and the use of the group tools to support and encourage group and team work.

Collaborative learning theory is built upon those tenets of quality that we review in distance education these include student to student communication, student to content, and student to faculty.  These learning activities are illustrated as below:

The model above identifies several avenues of social interchange which seems to support the respondents observations regarding social learning theory.  Bandura identified and defined social learning theory in 1977 as the, “importance of observing and modeling the behaviors, attitudes, and emotional reactions of others….further

as continuous reciprocal interaction between cognitive, behavioral, an environmental influences. The component processes underlying observational learning are: (1) Attention, including modeled events (distinctiveness, affective valence, complexity, prevalence, functional value) and observer characteristics (sensory capacities, arousal level, perceptual set, past reinforcement), (2) Retention, including symbolic coding, cognitive organization, symbolic rehearsal, motor rehearsal), (3) Motor Reproduction, including physical capabilities, self-observation of reproduction, accuracy of feedback, and (4) Motivation, including external, vicarious and self reinforcement. (Bandura,1977 as quoted in http://tip.psychology.org/bandura.html, retrieved 2/10/10).

In addition to this, due to the rich immersive experience of being in virtual worlds experiential learning seems to be a logical choice for designing learning activities in virtual worlds.  Kolb defined experiential learning as follows: “experiential learning theory defines learning as ‘the process whereby knowledge is created through the transformation of experience. Knowledge results from the combination of grasping and transforming experience’”(Kolb 1984, p. 41, retrieved from http://www.d.umn.edu/~kgilbert/educ5165-731/Readings/experiential-learning-theory.pdf, 2/10/10).  Fernwick, in 2007, identified the five dimensions of experiential learning as purpose, interpretation, engagement, self, and context.

Finally several respondents noted connectivism as a learning theory to be applied to designing course activities in virtual worlds.  Connectivism is a learning theory that should be at the forefront of learning in this digital age.  Defined by Siemens and Downes it takes into account the impact that advances in educational technology has had on how we learn.  (Siemens, 2005, retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm 2/10/10).

Siemens, 2005, further describes connectivism as the integration of eprinciples explored chaos, network and complexity and self organization theories.  He identified the following:

Principles of connectivism:

  • Learning and knowledge rests in diversity of opinions.
  • Learning is a process of connecting specialized nodes or information sources.
  • Learning may reside in non-human appliances.
  • Capacity to know more is more critical than what is currently known
  • Nurturing and maintaining connections is needed to facilitate continual learning.
  • Ability to see connections between fields, ideas, and concepts is a core skill.
  • Currency (accurate, up-to-date knowledge) is the intent of all connectivist learning activities.
  • Decision-making is itself a learning process. Choosing what to learn and the meaning of incoming information is seen through the lens of a shifting reality. While there is a right answer now, it may be wrong tomorrow due to alterations in the information climate affecting the decision.

Connectivism lends itself very well to the current wave of information, social networking, technology, and change that we experience on a daily basis.  How this theory will allow us as learners and teachers apply the appropriate tools that we need to in order to learn is critical to assisting learners in achieving their goals.  Applying the environment of Second Life to facilitate learning, achieve the aim of decision making as a learning process and making effective decisions  is critical, however those opportunities are there as one engages in the virtual environment.

Putting the onus of learning on the student in student centered learning versus teacher centered learning requires a more consistent method of providing a means for the student to gather feedback on his/her progress in achieving the learning outcomes.  It is the learning outcomes that are fundamental to the assessment process.  The feedback or assessment that should be consistent, constant, and non intrusive to the student accessing the content or activiites he or she needs, and allow the student with the opportunity to apply new knowledge as well as prior learning.

Even if an individual goes off on his/her own explorations in the virtual world he or she can maintain connections with their group, engaged in the environment and observing the creation of objects and how they were designed by others.  They can communicate their findings back to their core group, ask questions of the builder who designed the object, can evaluate the object, and monitor, based upon the feedback if their activities are achieving the course or program learning outcomes. Essentially successfully achieving the outcomes is demonstrated by how successful the student is in demonstrating what he/she has learned, how they communicate their activities, and how they can demonstrate what they have learned to real life and virtually.

It is apparent that those who design learning experiences in virtual worlds can identify those practices which lend themselves best to the opportunities provided in Second Life for education.  Understanding the basic fundamentals of learning theories helps the educator best craft a learning “blueprint,” which justifies and drives the learning activities for students.  This justification is critical for students to grasp immediately and thereby makes their experience that much richer.  Getting students comfortable in Second Life as soon as  possible is essential so they can get beyond learning the basic fundamentals of navigation, communication and the culture so they can quickly access what they need to learn is critical.

Bandura, A. (1977), Social Learning Theory, as retrieved from http://tip.psychology.org/bandura.html.

Fenwick, Tara J, & Gouthro, Patricia (REVIEWER). (2004). Learning through experience: troubling orthodoxies and intersecting questions Review of the Learning through experience: troubling orthodoxies and intersecting questions Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 50(2), 211-214.  Retrieved February 10, 2010, from CBCA Complete.

Holistic. (2007, February 22). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 00:25, February 11, 2010, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Holistic&oldid=110097300

Kolb, David A.., Boyatzis, Richard, Mainemelis, Charalampos, Experiential Learning Theory:
Previous Research and New Directions
R. J. Sternberg and L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on cognitive, learning, and thinking styles. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000.

Macgregor, Jean, Smith, Barbara; What is Collaborative Learning? retrieved from http://learningcommons.evergreen.edu/pdf/collab.pdf 2/10/10.

Siemens, George,Connectivism:A Learning Theory for the Digital Age, 2004, retrieved from Elearnspace, http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm).

Tapscott, Don and Williams, Anthony,Innovating the 21st-Century University: It’s Time!.  Educause Review, 45, 1.

Virtual world. (2010, February 7). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 00:24, February 11, 2010, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Virtual_world&oldid=342452412

  • Share/Bookmark
30
Jan

Online education, self directed learning and student centered learning

by Cathy in Education, Education Technology, Future, Higher Education

In their article in USDLA’s Distance Learning for Educators, Trainers, and Leaders Maria Puzziferro and Kaye Shelton ask questions regarding online education and distance learning that we as educators in online courses and programs should be asking ourselves as we review our courses and programs for quality.

One assumption that they question is “how do we define student or learning centered and students are in control of their own learning (pp 10).   this made me stop and think..it is easy to assume that this latest “buzz word phrase,” of the day drives the direction of online education today and education in general.  If we can say that our courses, programs and services are student or learner centered..then job done..we are meeting the needs of students.  But do we really know what this means?  does the student?  Does your educational institution or organization have a common agreement regarding what learning/student centered means and does it matter?   or are these just good PR buzz phrases?  Here are some various definitions of the terms and the institutions who use them…

We use the term “learner centered” to refer to environments that pay careful attention to the knowledge, skills, attitudes, and beliefs that learners bring to the educational setting.…Teachers who are learner centered recognize the importance of building on the conceptual and cultural knowledge that students bring with them to the classroom…. (retrieved from ..http://cndls.georgetown.edu/crossroads/vkp/resources/glossary/learnercentered.htm, January 30,2010)
Learner-centered education places the student at the center of education. It begins with understanding the educational contexts from which a student comes. It continues with the instructor evaluating the student’s progress towards learning objectives. By helping the student acquire the basic skills to learn, it ultimately provides a basis for learning throughout life. It therefore places the responsibility for learning on the student, while the instructor assumes responsibility for facilitating the student’s education. This approach strives to be individualistic, flexible, competency-based, varied in methodology and not always constrained by time or place. (retrieved from http://www.abor.asu.edu/4_special_programs/lce/afc-defined_lce.htm )

...in the learner-centered paradigm, knowledge is the combined efforts of the teacher and the students. Under the guidance of the teacher, the students synthesize the gathered information using problem solving, critical thinking, and inquiry skills.

… the learner-centered classroom instruction, greater emphasis is given on the meaningfulness of knowledge. Students acquire knowledge to address real-life issues and problems.
In the learner-centered classroom, the students are actively involved in seeking out knowledge.
in the learner-centered classroom, the importance of right answers is overshadowed by the importance of creating better questions. Thus, assessment tools vary to embrace the multiple facets of learning. Besides paper tests, there will be portfolios,  and others.

…in the learner-centered paradigm, assessment is intertwined with classroom instruction. The results of a test are used to discover learning difficulties. The functions of the assessment are to diagnose learning problems and to encourage better learning.

The perspective that couples a focus on individual learners (their heredity, experiences, perspectives, backgrounds, talents, interests, capacities, and needs) with a focus on learning (the best available knowledge about learning and how it occurs and about teaching practices that are most effective in promoting the highest levels of motivation, learning, and achievement for all learners). This dual focus then informs and drives educational decision making. The learner-centered perspective is a reflection of the twelve learner-centered psychological principles in the programs, practices, policies, and people that support learning for all. (McCombs & Whisler, 1997)

Premises of the Learner-Centered Model

  1. Learners are distinct and unique. Their distinctiveness and uniqueness must be attended to and taken into account if learners are to engage in and take responsibility for their own learning.
  2. Learners’ unique differences include their emotional states of mind, learning rates, learning styles, stages of development, abilities, talents, feelings of efficacy, and other academic and nonacademic attributes and needs. These must be taken into account if all learners are to be provided with the necessary challenges and opportunities for learning and self-development.
  3. Learning is a constructive process that occurs best when what is being learned is relevant and meaningful to the learner and when the learner is actively engaged in creating his or her own knowledge and understanding by connecting what is being learned with prior knowledge and experience.
  4. Learning occurs best in a positive environment, one that contains positive interpersonal relationships and interactions, that contains comfort and order, and in which the learner feels appreciated, acknowledged, respected, and validated.
  5. Learning is a fundamentally natural process; learners are naturally curious and basically interested in learning about and mastering their world. Although negative thoughts and feelings sometimes interfere with this natural inclination and must be dealt with, the learner does not require “fixing.”
(McCombs & Whisler, 1997)
Student-centered learning (SCL), or learner-centeredness, is a learning model that places the student (learner) in the center of the learning process. In student-centered learning, students are active participants in their learning; they learn at their own pace and use their own strategies; they are more intrinsically than extrinsically motivated; learning is more individualized than standardized. Student-centered learning develops learning-how-to-learn skills such as problem solving, critical thinking, and reflective thinking. Student-centered learning accounts for and adapts to different learning styles of students (National Center for Research on Teacher Learning. 1999).
Students are actively involved.
Emphasis is on using and communicating knowledge effectively to address enduring and emerging issues and problems in real life contexts.
Professors role is to coach and facilitate.  Professor and student evaluate learning together.
Teaching and assessing are intertwined.
Assessment is used to promote and diagnose learning.
Emphasis is on generating better questions and learning from errors.
Desired learning is accessed directly through papers, projects, performances, portfolios and the like.
Approach is compatible with interdisciplinary investigation.
Culture is cooperative, collaborative, an
d supportive.
Professors and students learn together.

(retrieved from http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/instruction/assessment/dictionary/learnercentered.html  01/3/10)

After reviewing the above definitions I have reached the conclusion that defining learner centered is varied and without much to ‘hang your hat on” in regards to using as a foundation for quality, student success, development of quality and measuring the effectiveness of the program or course.

The most current term that I hear bandied about is “self directed learning..” exactly what is self directed learning and what does it mean for students?

Defined as:

self-directed learning (SDL), the individual takes the initiative and the responsibility for what occurs. Individuals select, manage, and assess their own learning activities, which can be pursued at any time, in any place, through any means, at any age. (retrieved from http://www.selfdirectedlearning.com/ 01/30/10)
Be sure and read Roger Hiemstra’s article on self-directed learning which includes the following definition:

Several things are known about self-directed learning: (a) individual learners can become empowered to take increasingly more responsibility for various decisions associated with the learning endeavor; (b) self-direction is best viewed as a continuum or characteristic that exists to some degree in every person and learning situation; (c) self-direction does not necessarily mean all learning will take place in isolation from others; (d) self-directed learners appear able to transfer learning, in terms of both knowledge and study skill, from one situation to another; (e) self-directed study can involve various activities and resources, such as self-guided reading, participation in study groups, internships, electronic dialogues, and reflective writing activities; (f) effective roles for teachers in self-directed learning are possible, such as dialogue with learners, securing resources, evaluating outcomes, and promoting critical thinking; (g) some educational institutions are finding ways to support self-directed study through open-learning programs, individualized study options, non-traditional course offerings, and other innovative programs.
(retrieved from http://www-distance.syr.edu/sdlhdbk.html, 01/3/10)

Regardless of how we apply these terms, how learners learned, and how teachers teach those students who are now working their way through the public school system (elementary and secondary), virtual schools, and charter schools, will be the genesis for tranformative change in our higher education institutions.   One question that I kept returning to is how do measure success or failure when through these definitions we are seeking to put more and more of the accountability for learning on the student.  And who should be accountable in this age of “no child left behind,” standardized testing of everything and the cookie cutter approach to education that entails ..if “student centered learning” en-vogue movement of the day, especially in online education.

What is quality in online education, what should we be measuring and evaluating?

There are new paradigms in education that should be considered in evaluating the online course or program.  How does that course or program engage the students, provide them with opportunities for synthesis of the materials, critical thinking, multi “everything,” validates their learning, provides for opportunities of natural and designed collaboration, communicate across multiple modalities to multi dimensional/diversified audiences?  How do we measure how students create content that is pertinent to the outcomes of what they need to learn, how they are teaching and learning with others.    How the use of PowerPoint is applied in an online course suddenly doesn’t seem so important as we prepare students for working, accessing information, communicating, and collaborating in a fast paced global society. Finally we must ask ourselves why it is so compelling that we
“control” our students.  Why must we funnel their access to content through our ‘filters,” and why do actually think we are really exerting any control any way.

So how do we define quality and does it make sense to measure the quality in online education against that of face to face..in my opinion that is a cop out…we should stretch the boundaries of where technology can take us in online education by expanding our definition of what that means outside of the parameters of face to face education.  There is so much more that we can do with technology, increasing the amount of time that a student spend reviewing online content, researching on  their own, and multi-modalities of delivery that meets an individual student’s needs.

It has been asserted that students, who have been dissatisfied with the content in their courses have actually reviewed the content in similar open courses available on the web. they do this in order to  supplement their face to face and online courses.

So then what is the role of teachers, faculty, and administrators.  This is the disruption of education that is occurring, we don’t know, our roles are in transition.  Do students and learners need us, can the tools of technology facilitate and define what student need to learn …will technology remove the education “middle” ground of delivery in much the same way that the music industry has been disrupted, cable televisions, newspapers, and publishing.  I ponder that in order for the ideal definitions of “student centered learning” and self directed learning to be achieved the educational institutions, the teachers, and administrators have to be removed from the equation?

As an educator I acknowledge that my profession is changing, when the student or consumer defines how to validate what he or she has learned and that validation is widely accepted then our educational institutions have been disrupted.   While I am excited by change, as always ..I am apprehensive and selfishly concerned how this change will impact me.

McCombs, B. L., & Whisler, J. S. (1997). The learner-centered classroom and school: Strategies for increasing student motivation and achievement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Share/Bookmark
19
Dec

Free Textbooks..information and resources from the web

by Cathy in Education, Free Education, Higher Education, Open Courseware, Open Education Resources

In today’s economy and rising prices for everything cutting costs for students in areas where we can has become and will continue to be of paramount importance to students and their families in making a choice on where they can go to college.  Mainstream media has jumped on the bandwagon with various articles on free and reduced cost textbooks over the last couple of years.  These include articles in US News and World Report which provides an overview of available textbooks resources from free to reduced cost.

In September 14, 2008 the New York Times reported in an article on the various options of providing textbooks at reduced costs including  print on demand options such as Lulu and Flatworld Knowledge,  allowing free downloads in Word and PDFs versions of textbooks, and sites such as Merlot and Connexions.   In an LA Times article dated August 18, 2008 economic text author McAfee noted that it does take work to find online textbooks and resource.  More on McAfree’s work and rationale for open sourcing his textbooks can also be found in this Inside Higher Ed article.

There are some student run sites such as Textbook Revolution which provides:

Our approach is to bring all of the free textbooks we can find together in one place, review them, and let the best rise to the top and find their way into the hands of students in classrooms around the world…. links to textbooks and select educational resources of all kinds. Some of the books are PDF files; others are viewable online as e-books.

Another similar site to this one, but not student run,  is the Open Textbook Registry which is:

a registry of textbooks (and related materials) which are open — that is free for anyone to use, reuse and redistribute. It is run by the Open Knowledge Foundation.

Of course one must be concerned because the cost of textbooks seems to increase the likelihood that students will engange in illegal activities to get the books that they need for little or no cost as related in this article from Boston.com ..

“We think it’s a significant problem,” said William Sampson, manager of infringement and antipiracy at Cengage Learning Inc., a reference book publisher in Farmington Hills, Mich. Sampson said that in any given month, 200 to 300 of the company’s titles are posted illegally as free Internet downloads. Distributing books for free without permission violates copyright laws and deprives publishers of revenue.”

We will be evaluating the use of Merlot in the months to come, however it is important to note that Merlot plays a significant role in the affordable textbook initiative.  Membership in Merlot provides individuals with the opportunity to contribute learning materials, create a personal  collection, share online expertise, and receive peer recognition. The Open Textbook project for Merlot is found at this link on their website and contains 279 resources.   Of course membership is not required to access the resources on the website.  It is important to note that their resources undergo an peer review and are rated.

Do you use any of the resources below in developing your course content, if not why not?  If you favorite resource is not here would you note that in the comments?  If you do why?  What are the advantages? How are these received by students?

I posed the question regarding free/open source textbooks to the DEOS list serv,  this is a list serv for those who work in the field of distance education, and received information back regarding the Orange Grove. The Orange Grove was also profiled in Inside Higher Ed in September. The Orange Grove is actually an example of a university press providing course/textbooks online and downloadable for free.  Another good example is that Anthabasca Press http://www.aupress.ca/index.php/books/bySeries/2 which includes:

Anthabasca University Press is part of the growing collection of the Lois Hole Campus Alberta Digital Library (LHCADL). AU Press’s open access, digital collection of peer reviewed scholarly work provides valuable educational resources (e-books, journals, website publications and videos) that support Lois Hole’s vision of accessible research and learning.

Another example of efforts in promoting open access resources is this on e of an individual keeping a resource base of applicable web based resources on the Technology Training Center of Porterville College.  See this comprehensive list of resources herehttp://www.portervillecollege.edu/tlc/resources.htm#OER

Freetextbooks: This site seems to have a little of everything from lecture notes, to free textbooks, and other webbased resources.

Learnout loud:  your one-stop destination for audio and video learning.   Browse over 20,000 educational audio books, MP3 downloads, podcasts, and video.

Further examples of open education resource depositories include Wikimedia. Under the umbrella of Wikimedia is Wikiversity, Wikisource, and Wikibooks both provide accessible resources for textbooks and course content.

Wikiversity is a Wikimedia Foundation project devoted to learning resources, learning projects, and research for use in all levels, types, and styles of education from pre-school to university, including professional training and informal learning.

Wikisource is an online library of free content publications collected and maintained by our community. We now have 135,382 texts in the English language library.

Wikibooks a Wikimedia community for creating a free library of educational textbooks that anyone can edit. Wikibooks began on July 10, 2003; since then Wikibooks has grown to include over 38,399 pages …

Wikia Education; A list of University / Education Wikis

Wikiversity:  a Wikimedia Foundation project devoted to learning resources, learning projects, and research for use in all levels, types, and styles of education from pre-school to university, including professional training and informal learning. We invite teachers, students, and researchers to join us in creating open educational resources and collaborative learning communities.

Open Education Campaign Wiki:

An open university is one in which

  1. The research the university produces is open access.
  2. The course materials are open educational resources.
  3. The university embraces free software and open standards.
  4. If the university holds patents, it readily licenses them for free software, essential medicines, and the public good.
  5. The university network reflects the open nature of the internet.

where “university” includes all parts of the community: students, faculty, administration. The Declaration was a joint statement of the community at the [Free Culture 2008 Conference] in Berkeley, CA.

Amser:  AMSER, Applied Math, Sciences Educational Repository, is a portal of educational resources and servicesCommunity and Technical Colleges but free for anyone to use. built specifically for use by those in

Private industry is also getting involved in the opencourseware initiative as well as indicated by the Novell Opencourseware site. They state that:  OpenCourseWare is a collection of educational materials developed by Novell Training Services for authorized courses and other customer training purposes. By making these materials available to the public, we hope to extend to all people worldwide the opportunity to access these high quality learning materials.

Open Culture University: Open Culture brings together high-quality cultural & educational media for the worldwide lifelong learning community. Web 2.0 has given us great amounts of intelligent audio and video. It’s all free. It’s all enriching. But it’s also scattered across the web, and not easy to find. Our whole mission is to centralize this content, curate it, and give you access to this high quality content whenever and wherever you want it. Free audio books, free university courses, free movies, free language lessons and other enriching content — it’s all here. (from their website)

Videos,  I Tunes v-casts, podcasts, etc., all provide the educator and student with access to a broad spectrum of educators in their field of discipline:

Ted Talks: TED.com, we make the best talks and performances from TED and partners available to the world, for free. More than 450 TEDTalks are now available, with more added each week. All of the talks feature closed captions in English, and many feature subtitles in various languages. These videos are released under a Creative Commons license, so they can be freely shared and reposted. (retrieved from their website)

FORA.tv helps intelligent, engaged audiences get smart. Our users find, enjoy, and share videos about the people, issues, and ideas changing the world.

We gather the web’s largest collection of unmediated video drawn from live events, lectures, and debates going on all the time at the world’s top universities, think tanks and conferences. We present this provocative, big-idea content for anyone to watch, interact with, and share –when, where, and how they want.

With our community of savvy users and an extensive, growing library of smart videos, FORA.tv is at the forefront of the ongoing integration – and transformation – of the traditional media, TV, cable, and online industries from mass-market to high-quality, high-value content. FORA.tv was founded in 2005 and is funded by a select group of investors including William R. Hearst III and Adobe Ventures.  (retrieved from their website)

Psychology/about.com About sites usually provide a detailed list of web based resources in a variety of areas.

LearnOutLoud audio and video resources for Psychology (from their website) Check out 10 of the top free online psychology audio books, lectures, & podcasts. For the past three years we’ve featured dozens of free psychology resources as part of our Free Resource of the Day Emails

EduFire:  Live Video Learning Online Classes Fit Your Busy Schedule Learning is easy with top instructors. Learn anytime from anywhere.. from their website they state:

We have a simple (but not easy) mission: Revolutionize education. Our goal is to create a platform to allow live learning to take place over the Internet anytime from anywhere. Most importantly…for anyone. We’re the first people (that we know of) to create something that’s totally open and community-driven (rather than closed and transaction-driven.

As you can see there is an endless supply of resources on the web and it grows daily.  If this is not enough for you or your class they can collaboratively create their own content via blogs, webcasts, wikis, and podcasts!  It’s a whole new age in education of self-created content, self learning to group activities, collaboration and building on or “meshing’ up the knowledge of other resources.


  • Share/Bookmark
21
Nov

Open Courseware, social networking, thoughts on the future of education..

by Cathy in Education, Education Technology, Free Education, Higher Education, Open Courseware, Open Education Resources

I have some observations on open education resources, open courseware, and open access, what I think it is and what I think it is not.  Over time our online world has become well populated with “learning opportunities, objects and events,” not only do we need to filter and sort through this but also determine if we are going to validate these and if so how. In the last several months many new social networking, collaboration, and information ‘tools” have burst on the scene..and soon to follow are those of us in education who start evaluating these tools for the application to education.. I think this is a good thing, however  I also have to question if we are expending our energies appropriately.

On one side of the equation are the early adopters who are scrambling to apply new technology to their courses, introduce it to faculty or infuse its use system wide, on the other end are those who strongly feel that new tech tools, social networking, virtual worlds, and social networking really has no place in education  and is a distraction in the classroom. Open education resources or (OER) are no exception to this as well.

I have often heard the statement made…there is no evidence or research that demonstrates that any institution uses OER for development of a course much less a program.   There is also no research demonstrating whether or not individuals use OER to facilitate their informal learning and whether or not they have sought to have that learning validated.  I have yet to delve into any research so am not certain whether or not these observation are credible or not.

However I do contend that open(ness) or open source does have a demonstrable track record of success as it has its genesis in the open source software movement.  The open source software movement can be given credit for driving progress in information technology, software, and even demonstrating the power of collaboration in today’s society.  Open source started, according to sources in the late 1970′s and early 1980′s given this history and continued evolution into today I believe that it provides evidence of the direction that open education resources can take given the right conditions.

What are the elements of this “perfect storm”  (referred to also by Adler and Brown in their article
Minds on Fire: Open Education, the Long Tail, and Learning 2.0)  of resources and people who will make the application and use of OER to learning..many things and there may still be some ingredients missing, however I believe that some of the most essential are in place.  Open courseware sites and institutions do not grant certificates or degrees, no instructional support is provided, there may also be certain terms of use associated with the course materials.

I currently see:


Disruptive technology:  it seems that there are many freely and widely available technical tools that provide a platform for delivering content to learners, however the problem, in my opinion is the overwhelming amount of that content that is available.  In regards to the tools it seems that there is a rush to get them online and available to users, they maybe overshadowed and or ‘out-shined” by someone else’s innovation they are the first on the market.   An example of the growth in content includes the evidence provided on the OpenCourseware Consortium website which indicates collaborations with over 200 higher education institutions.    A great advantage of the technology we have today and technology of the future is that it provides us with educational content through a variety of channels via text, audio, video, live web casts, and virtual worlds.    Not only that the technology provides for multiple points or networks of communication which provides for groups to collaborate, discuss and remix content.  This is the network age, this is the age we all learn together and from eachother.

Another ingredient to this perfect storm is the availability of content on the web, there are now a plethora of sties and resources for educational content, these include:


YouTube. edu: I strongly suggest the reader to look at Youtube.edu carefully, look at the number of viewers on some of these lectures, review the comments and determine how viewers are using these lectures.  I am certain that viewers, outside of the professor’s classroom are reviewing these lectures and making them part of their personal learning network.

Open Education Resource Commons:  “Open Educational Resources are teaching and learning materials that you may freely use and reuse, without charge. OER often have a Creative Commons or GNU license that state specifically how the material may be used, reused, adapted, and shared.”  Examples of their resources include:  courses, interactive mini lessons, adaptations of existing open work, peer-reviewed electronic textbooks, K-12 resources.

Wikiversity:  a Wikimedia Foundation project devoted to learning resources, learning projects, and research for use in all levels, types, and styles of education from pre-school to university, including professional training and informal learning. We invite teachers, students, and researchers to join us in creating open educational resources and collaborative learning communities.

Connexions: a place to view and share educational material made of small knowledge chunks called modules that can be organized as courses, books, reports, etc. Anyone may view or contribute:

  • authors create and collaborate
  • instructors rapidly build and share custom collections
  • learners find and explore content


ccLearn: ccLearn is a division of Creative Commons dedicated to realizing the full potential of the Internet to support open learning and open educational resources.

DiscoverEd, a search prototype that provides scalable search and discovery for educational resources on the web.

FreeLearning: Here you will find FREE TO USE learning resources that you can use to supplement your own course materials or learning. Some of these are from BC-based projects while others are from Open Educational Resource projects from around the world.


Utah Open Courseware: Utah may have “lost funding” for their  open courseware project however the website is still very much alive.  The website states: Utah OpenCourseWare is a collection of educational material used in our formal campus courses, and seeks to provide people around the world with an opportunity to access high quality learning opportunities.

The Chinese Opencourseware initiative is one to watch, in fact I first learned about when I was touring educational sites in Second Life at the Educators Co-op.  I have heard claims that “no one” has gotten a degree or even completed a course using open courseware…my guess is they don’t know what is going on in Asia or India with the use of open courseware.

FETP Open Courseware: From the website: students may use FETP’s materials to guide independent study. Course syllabi, lecture notes, reading lists and problem sets used in many one-year mid-career program and executive education courses are already available online and over time FETP OpenCourseWare will include all Fulbright School materials (subject to copyright law).

Japan OpenCourseware

John Hopkins Open Courseware:  J ohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health’s OPENCOURSEWARE (OCW) project provides access to content of the School’s most popular courses.

Notre Dame OCW: Notre Dame OCW is a free and open educational resource for faculty, students, and self-learners throughout the world.



Private industry is also getting involved in the opencourseware initiative as well as indicated by the Novell Opencourseware site. They state that: OpenCourseWare is a collection of educational materials developed by Novell Training Services for authorized courses and other customer training purposes. By making these materials available to the public, we hope to extend to all people worldwide the opportunity to access these high quality learning materials.

BBC Online Courses: These online modules and guides are free for you to use. They were originally designed for BBC staff and in publishing them here we have not made many editorial changes to them.



Podcasts for education:

The Education Podcast Network is an effort to bring together into one place, the wide range of podcast programming that may be helpful to teachers looking for content to teach with and about, and to explore issues of teaching and learning in the 21st century.


Learning in Hand: Students and teachers from all over the world are learning from audio and video programs on desktop computers, laptops, iPods, Pocket PCs, Palm handhelds, and other devices.

Apple and education podcasts

Education podcasts: Education podcasts from universities, colleges, students, teachers — everyone who uses podcasting to learn and to teach others. We’re all life-long learners, aren’t we? Even some of the littlest ones in k-12 schools are podcasting. Be transported back to your elementary days…if only this technology were available then.

A good resource on educational podcasts is here at Shambles.net.

Education World (from their website) has compiled the Web’s latest and greatest podcasting resources to help you get started with this exciting and doable technology. Included: How-to articles, lesson ideas, free and fee-based software download sites, and much more!

Social networking is another part of the perfect storm and the technology that underlies this rising tide of “connectedness,” (yes I am in George Siemens and Stephen Downes Open Course on Connectiveness).  There is, of course, Twitter, Facebook, and Ning, there are also efforts by learning management systems to better incorporate networking tools into their systems.  However can an educators use tools such as Ning, Elgg, Twine, and .. well there are so many tools out there now I overwhelmed at the moment.

I am a member of several Ning Communities and still trying to figure that out.   Ning  allows the user to join social networks which provides memberships to communities that have similar interests, etc., Elgg seems to be similar to Ning but you can host it on your own website.  I hope to have an Elgg site eventually in order to test it for delivery of course materials.    From their website:

Ning is a platform for creating your own social network. Our passion is putting new social networks in the hands of anyone with a good idea. With Ning, your social network can be for anything and anyone. You start by naming your social network and choosing a combination of features (photos, videos, forums, events, etc.) from an ever-growing list of options. You can then customize your social network’s appearance and launch it! People who join your social network will automatically have a customizable profile page and will be able to message and friend each other.

Elgg is an open source product which “comes with advanced user management and administration, social networking, cross-site tagging, powerful access control lists, internationalisation support, multiple view support (eg cell phones, iPhone), an advanced templating engine, a widget framework and more.

I used Twine for  a while to collect content..I think it has great potential. I understand it is currently undergoing some major revisions, I can’t wait to see what they do next. According to their website Twine allows you to:

Collect content. Join a twine on any subject or start your own to track your interests. Twine organizes your content by topic, so you can keep track of it and share it with anyone you want.

Share interests. The Twine community is interested in the same things you are. Find people who are passionate about your interests. Join conversations. Learn something new. Share things you find with relevant communities.

Get custom recommendations. The more you use Twine, the smarter it gets. Fill out your profile to discover new info and interests through Twine’s personalized recommendation

Why do I think that we are or are not expending our current energies appropriately because not doing anything and think that education and students will be what it was 10, 5 or even a year ago is deceiving ourselves.  Education is now going down the path of being irrevocably and forever changed.  Someone will find an acceptable way to measure that learners who “self learn” are achieving the appropriate learning outcomes, of providing learners with the appropriate content that they need to learn, networked learning will be the norm.  It doesn’t mean the end of colleges and universities …they will look much the same way in 10 years as they do now..the experience of college will always be a vital part of our culture and our society ..but how the classroom looks and how students access content may be very different than it is right now.

So are we in the “eye of a perfect’ storm with all  these factors in  place which also includes many that I have not covered such as education experts such as Curtis Bonk, George Siemens, Stephen Downes, John Seely Brown and many others advocating for open courses, understanding the technology that it takes to make this vision happen as well as advocates for social networking.  In addition to this the credibility given to University of the People via its receiving support from the United Nations and Peer to Peer.  In addition to this we are seeing a push for education on a scale, globally that we have never before seen, an economy that can no longer support the expense of traditional education, a coming tide of retirements by faculty and administrators from educational institutions, and a universal realization that education IS lifelong if one is to keep current with trends in his/her occupation.





  • Share/Bookmark