//-->

Cathy Anderson

How do we harness the energy of information? Through Education!!

Horizon Report 2006 and 2007

Written By: Cathy - Apr• 15•13

currentworld

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006 Report

Key trends noted in this specific report:

 

Dynamic knowledge creation and social computing tools and processes are becoming more widespread and accepted.

Mobile and personal technology is increasingly being viewed as a delivery platform for services of all kinds.

Consumers are increasingly expecting individualized services, tools, and experiences, and open access to media, knowledge, information, and learning.

Collaboration is increasingly seen as critical across the range of educational activities, including intra- and inter-institutional activities of any size or scope.

 

Critical Challenges

Peer review and other academic processes, such as promotion and tenure reviews, increasingly do not reflect the ways scholarship actually is conducted.

Information literacy should not be considered a given, even among “net-gen” students.

Intellectual property concerns and the management of digital rights and assets continue to loom as largely unaddressed issues.

The typical approach of experimentally deploying new technologies on campuses does not include processes to quickly scale them up to broad usage when they work, and often creates its own obstacles to full deployment.

 

 

 

 

1 year or less

 

One Year of Less

 

Social Computing. The application of computer technology to facilitate interaction and collaboration, a practice known as social computing, ishappening all around us. Replacing face-to-face meetings with virtual collaboration tools, working on a daily basis with colleagues a thousand miles away, or attending a conference held entirely online is no longer unusual. An interesting aspect of social computing is the developmentof shared taxonomies—folksonomies—thatemerge organically from like-minded groups. Virtual Collaboration:

Virtual collaboration is the method of collaboration between virtual team members that is carried out via technology-mediated communication. Virtual collaboration follows the same process as collaboration, but the parties involved in virtual collaboration do not physically interact and communicate exclusively through technological channels.[1] Distributed teams use virtual collaboration to simulate the information transfer present in face-to-face meetings, communicating virtually through verbal, visual, written, and digital means. Virtual Collaboration is commonly used by globally distributed business and scientific teams. Ideally, virtual collaboration is most effective when it can simulate face-to-face interaction between team members through the transfer of contextual information, but technological limits in sharing certain types of information prevent virtual collaboration from being as effective as face to face.

Social Computing: Social computing is a general term for an area of computer science that is concerned with the intersection of social behavior and computational systems. It has become an important concept for use in business. It is used in two ways as detailed below

 Articles:

5 Tips for Virtual Collaboration, Forbes

How Successful Virtual Teams Collaborate

by Keith Ferrazz, Harvard Business ReviewVirtual Collaboration Environment
IBM Social Computing Guidelines
HP Social Computing Research
ISTC Social Computing
Article:  Social Computing An Overview, University of TX at Austin

Personal Broadcasting. With roots in textbased media (personal websites and blogs), personal broadcasting of audio and video material is a natural outgrowth of a popular trend made possible by increasingly more capable portable tools. From podcasting to video blogging (vlogging), personal broadcastingis already impacting campuses and museumaudiences significantly. Wikipedia definition:  Personal broadcasting and Personal mobile broadcasting is a term for participatory journalism that focuses on television webcasting over the internet and mobile internet. The term is akin to “personal publishing” which is synonymous with blogging. However, personal broadcasting is not the same as “vlog“ging (a portmanteau of “video web logging”), as vlogging does not stream live material. Build a Personal Broadcasting Network Pinterest Board

Folden E Media Blog; posts tagged Personal Broadcasting

WikiePedia:  Podcasts
A podcast is a type of digital media consisting of an episodic series of audio radio, video, PDF, or ePub files subscribed to and downloaded throughweb syndication or streamed online to a computer or mobile device. The word is a neologism derived from “broadcast” and “pod” from the success of the iPod, as podcasts are often listened to on portable media players. In the context of Apple devices, the term “Podcasts” refers to the audio and video version of podcasts, whereas the textual version of podcasts are classified under the app known as Newsstand.
Wikipedia:  VLoghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlog

A video blog or video log, sometimes shortened to vlog[1] (pronounced ‘vlog’ or ‘v-log’) is a form of blog for which the medium is video,[2] and is a form of web television. Entries often combine embedded video or a video link with supporting text, images, and other metadata. Entries can be recorded in one take or cut into multiple parts. It is also a very popular category on YouTube.Video logs (vlogs) also often take advantage of web syndication to allow for the distribution of video over the Internet using either the RSS or Atom syndication formats, for automatic aggregation and playback on mobile devices and personal computers (See video podcast).

 

2 years or less

 

The Phones in Their Pockets. A little further out on the horizon, but rapidly approaching, the delivery of educational content and services tocell phones is just around the corner. Amongthe keys that will unlock the true potential ofthis technology are improved network speeds, Flash Lite, and video: as new features that take advantage of the capabilities of these appear in phones, barriers to delivery of educationalcontent will vanish. Mobile Learning or MLearning:
The term m-learning or “mobile learning”, has different meanings for different communities, that refer to a subset of e-learning, educational technology and distance education, that focuses on learning across contexts and learning with mobile devices. One definition of mobile learning is, “any sort of learning that happens when the learner is not at a fixed, predetermined location, or learning that happens when the learner takes advantage of the learning opportunities offered by mobile technologies.”[1] In other words, with the use of mobile devices, learners can learn anywhere and at any time.[2]Mobile Learning: Mindshift
 		 Stanford Mobile Inquiry-based Learning Environment (SMILE)Mobile Learning PortalMobile Learning Technologies for the 21st century classroom
Mobile Learning United Nations (UNESCO)
Educational Gaming. A recent surge in interest in educational gaming has led to increasedresearch into gaming and engagement theory, the effect of using games in practice, and the structure of cooperation in gameplay. The serious implications of gaming are still unfolding, but we are not far away from  seeing what games can really teach us.   Games in education WikispacesA Literature Review of Games in Education
Playing to learn: Panelists at Stanford discussion say using games as an educational tool provides opportunities for deeper learningGames in Education – Resources for the K-12 Classroom

 

 

 

Augmented Reality and Enhanced Visual-ization. Currently in use in disciplines such asmedicine, engineering, and archaeology, thesetechnologies for bringing large data sets to lifehave the potential to literally change the way wesee the world by creating three-dimensional representations of abstract data. Augmented reality (AR) is a live, direct or indirect, view of a physical, real-world environment whose elements are augmented by computer-generatedsensory input such as sound, video, graphics or GPS data. It is related to a more general concept called mediated reality, in which a view of reality is modified (possibly even diminished rather than augmented) by a computer. As a result, the technology functions by enhancing one’s current perception of reality.[1] By contrast, virtual reality replaces the real world with a simulated one Augmented Reality:  MashableAugmented Reality; Wired
Context-Aware Environments and Devices. Advancements in context-aware computing aregiving rise to devices and rooms that respondto voice, motion, or other subtle signals. In theultimate application of these technologies, the “computing” part simply disappears, leavingan environment transparently responsive to itshuman occupants. Context awareness is a property of mobile devices that is defined complementary to location awareness. Whereas location may determine how certain processes in a device operate, context may be applied more flexibly with mobile users, especially with users of smart phones. Context awareness originated as a term from ubiquitous computing or as so-called pervasive computing which sought to deal with linking changes in the environment with computer systems, which are otherwise static. The term has also been applied to business theory in relation to business process management issues.[1] Cisco Context Aware SoftwareTowards Wide Area Context-Aware Environments

Context Aware Ubiquitous Learning Environments for Peer-to-Peer Collaborative Learning 

 

 

2007 Horizon Report:

 

Trends:   The environment of higher education is changing rapidly. Costs are rising, budgets are shrinking, and the demand for new services is growing. Student enrollments are declining.

 

Increasing globalization is changing the way we work, collaborate, and communicate.

 

Information literacy increasingly should not be considered a given.

 

Academic review and faculty rewards are increasingly out of sync with new forms of scholarship.

 

The notions of collective intelligence and mass amateurization are pushing the boundaries of

scholarship.

 

Students’ views of what is and what is not technology are increasingly different from those of faculty.

 

 

Critical Challenges:

 

Assessment of new forms of work continues to present a challenge to educators and peer reviewers.

 

There are significant shifts taking place in scholarship, research, creative expression, and learning, and a profound need for leadership at the highest levels of the academy that can

see the opportunities in these shifts and carry them forward.

 

While progress is being made, issues of intellectual property and copyright continue to

affect how scholarly work is done.

 

There is a skills gap between understanding how to use tools for media creation and how to create meaningful content.

 

The renewed emphasis on collaborative learning is pushing the educational community to develop new forms of interaction and assessment.

 

Higher education is facing a growing expectation to deliver services, content and media to

mobile and personal devices.

 

One year or less:

 

User-CreatedContent. It’s all about the audi-ence, and the “audience” is no longer merelylistening. User-created content is all around us,from blogs and photostreams to wikibooks andmachinima clips. Small tools and easy accesshave opened the doors for almost anyone tobecome an author, a creator, or a filmmaker.These bits of content represent a new form ofcontribution and an increasing trend toward au-thorship that is happening at almost all levels of experience. User-generated content (UGC) covers a range of media content available in a range of modern communications technologies. It entered mainstream usage during 2005, having arisen in web publishing and new media content production circles. It is used for a wide range of applications, including problem processing, news, gossip and research and reflects the expansion of media production through new technologies that are accessible and affordable to the general public User-Generated Content & Social Media

Next-Generation Content: User-Generated Content and Social Networks
SocialNetworking. Networking. Increasingly, this is the reason students log on. The websites that draw people back again and again are those that connect them with friends, colleagues, or even total strangers who have a shared interest.Social networking may represent a key way to increase student access to and participation incourse activities. It is more than just a friends list; truly engaging social networking offers anopportunity to contribute, share, communicate,and collaborate. Social Networking:
A social network is a social structure made up of a set of actors (such as individuals or organizations) and a complex set of the dyadic ties between these actors. The social network perspective provides a clear way of analyzing the structure of whole social entities.[1] The study of these structures uses social network analysis to identify local and global patterns, locate influential entities, and examine network dynamics.		 Social Networking, Mashable15 Most Popular Social Networking Sites uch  nformationToo Much information on social networking sites, you maybe giving away more than you thinkPew Internet: REPORTThe Demographics of Social Media Users — 2012Feb 14, 2013

 

 

Two to Three Years

 

Mobile Phones Mobile phones are fastbecoming the gateway to our digital lives.Feeding our need for instant access, mobilephones are our constant companions and offera connection to friends, information, favoritewebsites, music, movies, and more.  From applications for personal safety, to scheduling,to GIS, photos, and video, the capabilities ofmobile phones are increasing rapidly, and thetime is approaching when these little devices willbe as much a part of education as a bookbag.   What’s Holding Back Mobile Phones for Education?Pinterest board;  Mobile Phones in Education
The Use of Mobile Phones in Education in Developing Countries
Cell phone epidemic hurts education
Virtual Worlds Customized settings that mirror the real world—or diverge wildly from it—present the chance to  collaborate, explore,role-play, and experience other situations in asafe but compelling way. These spaces offer opportunities for education that are almost limitless, bound only by our ability to imagine andcreate them. Campuses,  businesses, and other organizations increasingly have a presence inthe virtual world, and the trend is likely to take off in a way that will echo the rise of the web in Wikipedia Virtual Worlds:
A virtual world is an online community that takes the form of a computer-based simulated environment through which users can interact with one another and use and create objects.[1] The term has become largely synonymous with interactive 3D virtual environments, where the users take the form of avatars visible to others.[2] These avatars usually appear as textual, two-dimensional, or three-dimensional representations, although other forms are possible (auditory and touch sensations for example).[3][4] In general, virtual worlds allow for multiple users.		 Educause Virtual Worlds in Education (2008)
Edudemic:  A Teacher’s Guide to Using Virtual Worlds in Education Horizon Project:   Virtual Worlds impact on Education
Top 20 uses of virtual worlds in education

 

 

The New scholarship and emerging forms of Publication. The nature and practice of schol-arship is changing. New tools and new ways tocreate, critique, and publish are influencing newand old scholars alike. Although this area is far-ther out on the horizon, we are beginning to seewhat new publications might look like—and hownew scholars might work.  

The New Scholarship and Emerging Forms of Publication

Learning Hub Future of scholarly publishing
Massively
Multiplayer educational Gaming.		 Like their non-educational counterparts in theentertainment industry, massively multiplayergames are engaging and absorbing. They arestill quite difficult to produce, and examples arerare; but steps are being taken toward makingit easier to develop this kind of game. In thecoming years, open-source gaming engines willlower the barrier to entry for developers, andwe are likely to see educational titles along withcommercial ones.    

 

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Institutional Effectiveness and Student Retention

Written By: Cathy - Apr• 14•13

As colleges and universities come under increased scrutiny and accountability the office, policy and procedures of institutional effectiveness will become more critical than ever before.

 

In the following posting  I will define institutional effectiveness, identify college offices of institutional effectiveness so that they reports, processes and procedures can be reviewed, and finally identify some critical data and information that institutions should be  collecting and reviewing for retention planning.

 

Central Piedmont Community College is the first site that comes up on a google search for “college institutional effectiveness.”  This site provides a definition for institutional effectiveness, which they cited as from the Southern Association of Schools and Colleges as follows:

 

A set of ongoing and systematic, institutional processes and practices that include:

 

  • planning
  • the evaluation of programs and services (including administration and student services)
  • the identification and measurement of outcomes across all institutional units (including learning and program outcomes in instructional programs), and
  • the use of data and assessment results to inform decision-making (culture of evidence)

All of these activities are accomplished with the purpose of improving programs and services and increasing student success and institutional quality.

 

Institutional effectiveness for CPCC primarily consists of the following:

 

The institutional effectiveness plan at the College consists of four major areas:

 

  1. Tracking progress on the strategic plan and strategic goals through an annual cycle of establishing unit level goals and action items.
  2. Conducting program and unit reviews. Program reviews that measure program and learning outcomes are conducted on a five-year cycle as the average student at CPCC completes in four to six years. Program review is also used to assess additional skills of the general education/Core4 competencies. Administrative and students’ services units, being service-providing units, conduct their reviews on a three-year cycle. These units measure administrative outcomes. Program and unit reviews have been conducted on a continuous cycle since 1998, and most programs/units have completed the process two to three times. Each year, approximately 20-25 academic programs and 15-20 administrative/student services units go through the program/unit review process.
  3. Collaborating with the General education committee which has responsibility for assessing college-level general education outcomes on an annual basis.
  4. Reporting out on the college’s various surveys, assessments (qualitative and quantitative) and national projects and completion initiatives.

 

 

The Office of Institutional Effectiveness for Lynchburg College provides a student profile, which in summary provides information on;

 

Current semester headcount, full time equivalent, graduate, undergraduate enrollments, gender enrollments, race/ethnicity, full time/part time, and enrollment by state.

 

The Institutional Effectiveness Committee at Lynchburg College has also developed the 10 steps for institutional effectiveness document.  These 10 steps are:

 

 

1. Establish a written mission or purpose.

2. Write the expected outcomes or objectives based on mission.

3. Determine the achievement target or the criteria for success for each outcome

(objective).

4. Identify measures and measurement strategies for each outcome or objective. Multiple

measures are appropriate.

5. Collect data using the measures to assess student performance / unit performance.

6. Analyze the findings(assessment data) in reference to the established criteria for

success.

7. Discuss and share results with program/departmental members to interpret findings.

Summarize.Note strengths, challenges, and examples where improved results can be

tied to use of assessment data.

8. Create action plans to effect improvements.

9. Include resource needs from action plans in budgeting prioritization.

10. Implement action plans;repeat steps 5 – 10 annually,review steps 1 – 4 periodically.

 

 

The Lynchburg College website provides a link to the Virginia Assessment Group.    The Virginia Assessment Group stated purpose and mission is:

 

The Virginia Assessment Group (VAG) promotes quality higher education through assessment and institutional effectiveness practices in all Commonwealth, post-secondary institutions. VAG serves as a network for communication and collaboration among institutions of higher education, state and federal agencies, and accreditation bodies. VAG offers professional development opportunities and serves as a forum for the exchange of ideas.

 

 

Edmonds Community College has developed an Institutional Effectiveness Plan.  This is the SIMPLE Plan which they states stands for:  Strategic, Informed, Measurable Process Leading to Effectiveness. As they state institutional effectiveness is a self-assessment process, “it is the purpose of the plan to align assessment with aligns department, unit, and committee goals with the college’s mission statement, core themes, and key performance indicators it provides an ongoing assessment and review of student learning and services provided for students.”

 

 

Gadsden State College provides an overview of unit level to institutional level assessment plans.   The provide the following types of program level assessments:

 

 

  • Embedded course assignments – a project completed at an advanced level can be

used to assess skills learned through the entire program.

 

  • Field Experiences – internship, practicum, service-learning, etc., evaluated through

supervisors’ ratings of student performance can be powerful evidence of a

successful program.

 

  • Portfolios – compilation of student work over time can be a clear demonstration of

student learning, although they can be complicated to assess.

 

  • Rubrics, Checklists, Task sheets – in advanced level courses, completed rubrics can

be very useful evidence of student achievement in a program.

 

  • Results of external licensure or certification exams.
  • Embedded comprehensive exam questions.

 

 

The also identify the following list of common assessment tools:

 

 

Direct indicators

 

  • pre-and post-testing;
  • capstone courses;
  • oral examinations;
  • internships;
  • portfolio assessments;
  • evaluation of capstone projects;
  • standardized national exams;
  • locally developed tests;
  • performance on licensure,
  • certification or professional exams;
  • juried reviews and performances.

 

Indirect indicators

 

  • alumni, employer, student surveys;
  • graduation rates;
  • transfer studies;
  • graduate follow-up studies;
  • success of students in subsequent institutional settings;
  • job placement data.

 

 

Ultimately, as Eastern Kentucky University states on their institutional effectiveness website..Institutional Effectiveness is about knowing and doing what it takes to ensure student success.

 

 

Dr. Robert Jones defined student retention as  the extent to which learners remain within a

higher education institution, and complete a program of study in a predetermined time-period.   He also identified the following:  The Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE), for

example, uses two measures of retention:  “The first is the ‘completion rate’ – the proportion of starters in a year who continue their studies until they obtain their qualification, with no more

than one consecutive year out of higher education.

 

A more immediate measure of retention is the proportion of an institution’s intake

which is enrolled in higher education in the year following their first entry  to higher education. This is the ‘continuation rate’.” (NAO, 2007, p5)

 

He identified the following primary reasons for student withdrawal or lack of persistence:

 

In this synthesis we have identified the following reasons or factors for

review:

1. Preparation for higher education.

2. Institutional and course match.

3. Academic experience.

4. Social integration.

5. Financial issues.

6. Personal circumstances.

Based upon his review of the literature he recommended the following:

 

 

(NAO 2007) and have become more pro-active in supporting student  success (Dodgson and Bolam 2002). Based on a review of the literature Yorke and Longden (2008) suggest the following factors contribute to  good student retention:

• an institutional commitment to student learning, and hence to student engagement;

• proactive management of student transition;

• curriculum issues such as treating learning as an academic and social milieu; and choosing curricular structures that increase the chances of student success.

 

 

The Office of Institutional Research with Ohio University provides the following information for student retention:

 

 

  • The overall first-year (freshman) retention rate
  • When students most commonly leave their institution (first year students between the fall and spring semesters  and the spring and fall (quarter) of their sophomore year)
  • Retention rate for certain racial/ethnic groups
  • The first-year retention rate for first generation college students versus non first generation students.
  • Retention rates for students by gender
  • There is a positive relationship between students’ high school academic performance and
  • retention and between ACT scores and retention.
  • Retention rates by programs
  • Large-enrollment first-year courses
  • Surveys of non-returning students revealed that among non-academic reasons for leaving Ohio University, personal adjustment, financial reasons, and environmental reasons were reported  most frequently.

 

 

From their 2008 study Craig and Ward recommended:

 

 

  • Promoting informational and assistance programs for high school students, especially to those most likely not to attend, concerning college admission and attendance.
  • Developing identification systems and intervention strategies to aid academically challenged community college students as early as possible.
  • Allocating sufficient resources to strengthen academic and career advising and counseling services for community college students, especially those at risk, and to begin counseling students prior to entry.
  • Promulgating stricter policies on course withdrawals. This recommendation parallels one suggested by Adelman, “There are also aspects of postsecondary education that do not bode well for degree attainment. . . .
  • No-penalty course withdrawals and no-credit course repeats are the ‘death knell’ that is within the power of the institutions to contain” (American Youth Policy Forum, 2006, ¶ 11).

 

Craig, A. J., & Cynthia V.L. Ward. (2008). Retention of community college students: Related student and institutional characteristics. Journal of College Student Retention, 9(4), 505-517. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/196731802?accountid=28844

Share
Posted in Collaboration, College Completion, continuous quality improvement, Education, Higher Education, Institutional research, Retention, Strategic planning, student success , , , , , | No Comments »

Horizon Reports 2004 and 2005 revisited

Written By: Cathy - Mar• 31•13

currentworld

 

In2004 the New Media Consortium started publishing the Horizon Reports.  The reports compiled the findings of what experts projected as emerging technologies in the field of education.    The 2004 report states specifically that;

 

The project draws on an ongoing series of interviews with scientists, engineers, technologists, and other knowledgeable individuals in business, industry, and education to identify potentially promising technologies, as well as published resources such as the Gartner Group’s Hype Cycles and other examinations of emerging technologies. The Horizon Project’s Advisory Board provided another perspective on the relative utility of each of the technologies identified.

 

The reports are structured and identify emerging trends or technology in education as follows:

 

The first assumes a high likelihood of broad adoption within the next year; the second, adoption within two to three years; and the third, adoption within four to five years.

 

 

Following I will provide an overview of each emerging trend or technology and information on the web that identifies the status of each today.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identified one to two year horizon:

 

 

LearningObjects Learning objects are assemblies of audio, graphic, animation and other digital files and materials that are intended to be reusable in a variety of ways, and easily combined into higher-level instructional components such as lessons and modules. The primary purpose behind the development and use of learning objects is to increase access to quality content, and to avoid wasteful replications of effort by making that content usable in a variety of contexts. Wikipedia: A learning object is “a collection of content items, practice items, and assessment items that are combined based on a single learning objective”.[1] The term is credited to Wayne Hodgins when he created a working group in 1994 bearing the name[2] though the concept was first described by Gerard in 1967.[3] Learning objects go by many names, including content objects, chunks, educational objects, information objects, intelligent objects, knowledge bits, knowledge objects, learning components, media objects, reusable curriculum components, nuggets, reusable information objects, reusable learning objects, testable reusable units of cognition, training components, and units of learning. Current status today:Learning objects websiteEdutechWikiWisc-OnlineLearning Objects Collections

 

Dept of Education University of Western Australia

 

MERLOT
Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) SVG uses XML for describing two-dimensional graphics, holding the information needed to draw an image in a text file. Scaling is smoothly achieved without jagged edges. Graphical objects can be styled, transformed, grouped, or placed into previously rendered objects. Text is searchable and selectable. SVG is an especially powerful tool for instructional developers on college and university campuses, with potential applications in virtually any discipline, but especially the sciences and  engineering. Wikipedia Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) is an XML-based vector image format for two-dimensional graphics that has support for interactivity and animation. The SVG specification is an open standard developed by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) since 1999.SVG images and their behaviors are defined in XML text files. This means that they can be searched, indexed, scripted, and, if need be, compressed. As XML files, SVG images can be created and edited with any text editor, but it is often more convenient to create them with drawing programs such as Inkscape Scalable Vector GraphicsScalable Vector Graphics in HTML5SVG BasicsAn Introduction

 

 

 

2rapidprototyping

 

 

 

 

 

2-3 years

 

 

Rapid Prototyping Rapid prototyping refers to what amounts to3-D printing, e.g., building three-dimensionalphysical objects from digital data files. Thesefiles may be created in a variety of ways,such as computer-aided design (CAD),computer-aided tomography (CAT), or evenX-ray crystallography, then output to a rapidprototyping machine that creates a physical

model of the object. This technology already

is widely used for a variety of manufacturing,

design, and engineering applications, but as

cost decreases, is finding new applications in

the arts and the classroom

 Wikipedia: Rapid prototyping is a group of techniques used to quickly fabricate a scale model of a physical part or assembly using three-dimensional computer aided design (CAD) data.[1]Construction of the part or assembly is usually done using 3D printing technology. The first techniques for rapid prototyping became available in the late 1980s and were used to produce models and prototype parts. Today, they are used for a much wider range of applications and are even used to manufacture production-quality parts in relatively small numbers. Some sculptors use the technology to produce exhibitions. Rapid Prototyping an overviewEdutech WikiRapid Prototyping reconsideredMilwaukee School of Engineering
Multimodal Interfaces Multimodal interfaces provide ways for humansto interact with computers beyond the traditionalmouse and keyboard, using inputs and outputsthat target not only each of the five senses,but also take advantage of nonverbal cuescommon in human conversation. Considerabledevelopment is taking place in simulations thatuse multimodal techniques (haptics or force

feedback, for example) to great effect.

 ATandT labs: Simply put, multimodal interfaces allow users to interact with computers using multiple different modes or channels of communication (e.g. speaking vs. clicking a button vs. writing). Different modes are best suited for different kinds of input or outputs. For example, it is easier for a user to select among millions of names in a directory by saying the name they are interested in rather than searching in a huge menu, but if the user only has to choose among say three or four options, it is easier to click a button in a graphical user interface than to use speech. The most effective multimodal interfaces enable more natural and effective interaction by allowing users to interact using whichever mode or combination of modes are most appropriate given the situation and their preferences and abilities. Journal on MultiModal InterfacesMultimodal Interface for Human CommunicationMultimodal interfaces in education for virtual world environmentsAn Empirical Investigation into the use of multimodal E-learning interfaces.http://www.intechopen.com/books/human-computer-interaction/an-empirical-investigation-into-the-use-of-multimodal-e-learning-interfaces

 

 

3-4 years

 

Context-Aware Computing Context-aware computing refers to computingdevices that can interpret contextual information and use it to aid decision-making and influence interactions. Contextual cues may include what the user is attending to, the user’s location and orientation, the date and time of day, lighting conditions, other objects and people in the environment, accessible infrastructure in the immediate vicinity, and so forth. Context-aware applications can make decisions based on such information without the need for user input. From Gartner:Context-aware computing  is a style of computing in which situational and environmental information about people, places and things is used to anticipate immediate needs and proactively offer enriched, situation-aware and usable content, functions and experiences. Interaction DesignContext aware computing mobile devicesA Survey of Context-Aware Mobile Computing Research
Knowledge Webs Knowledge web is a term that describes a dy-namic concept of individual and group knowl-edge generation and sharing, with technologyused to make connections between knowledge elements clear, to distribute knowledge over multiple pathways, and to represent knowledge in ways that facilitate its use. Work in knowledge webs overlaps considerably with that going onaround communities of practice, and holds the potential to help such communities share, create, analyze, validate, and distribute existing and emerging knowledge. From Wikipedia:Knowledge Web is the name of four different projects:

 

 James Burke Knowledge Web

 

 

 

2005 Horizon Report

 

Blended Learning Infographic

 

blended-learning

 

 

One year or less

Extended Learning. On some campuses,traditional instruction is augmented withtechnology tools that are familiar to studentsand used by them in daily life. Extended learning courses can be conceptualized as hybrid courses with an extended set of communication tools and strategies. The classroom serves as a home base for exploration, and integrates online instruction, traditional instruction, and study groups, all supported by a variety of communication tools. Hybrid courses, blended learning, supplemental
Ubiquitous Wireless. With new developmentsin wireless technology both in terms oftransmission and of devices that can connectto wireless networks, connectivity is increasingly available and desired. Campuses and even communities are beginning to regard universal wireless access as a necessity for all. Decade in wirelessdecade-in-wireless_50f0d66bcc699 Wireless industry

 

2- 3 years out

Intelligent Searching. To support people’s growing need to locate, organize, and retrieveinformation, sophisticated technologies forsearching and finding are becoming available.These agents range from personal desktopsearch “bots,” to custom tools that catalog and search collections at an individual campus, to specialized search interfaces like GoogleScholar. How Search Workshowsearchworks Internet Search Engine Historyinternet-search-engines
Educational Gaming. Taking a broad view ofeducational gaming, one finds that games arenot new to education. Technology and gamingcombine in interesting ways, not all of which areabout immersive environments or virtual reality.What is evolving is the way technology is appliedto gaming in education, with new combinationsof concepts and games appearing on the

horizon.

 Gamification in educationhttp://www.knewton.com/gamification-education/

 

3 or more

 

Social Networks and Knowledge Webs. Supplying people’s need to connect with each other in meaningful ways, social networks and knowledge webs offer a means of facilitating teamwork and constructing knowledge. Theunderlying technologies fade into the background while collaboration and communication are paramount. On the surface, social media and knowledge management (KM) seem very similar. Both involve people using technology to access information. Both require individuals to create information intended for sharing. Both profess to support collaboration.But there’s a big difference.

  • Knowledge management is what company management tells me I need to know, based on what they think is important.
  • Social media is how my peers show me what they think is important, based on their experience and in a way that I can judge for myself.

 

 Social Media/Social Network InfographicInfluence-and-Social-Media-Infographic-685x2954Web 2.0 and Social MediaKnowledge Management on the social Web
Context-Aware Computing/Augmented Reality. These related technologies deal with computers that can interact with people in richer ways. Context-aware computing uses environmental conditions to customize the user’s experience or options. Augmented reality provides additional  contextual information that appears as part ofthe user’s world. Goals of both approaches are increased access and ease-of-use. Augmented reality (AR) is a live, direct or indirect, view of a physical, real-world environment whose elements are augmented by computer-generated sensory input such as sound, video, graphics or GPSdata. It is related to a more general concept called mediated reality, in which a view of reality is modified (possibly even diminished rather than augmented) by a computer. As a result, the technology functions by enhancing one’s current perception of reality.[1] By contrast, virtual reality replaces the real world with a simulated one.[2][3] Augmentation is conventionally in real-time and in semantic context with environmental elements, such as sports scores on TV during a match. With the help of advanced AR technology (e.g. adding computer vision and object recognition) the information about the surrounding real world of the user becomes interactive and (can be) digitally (manipulated). Artificial information about the environment and its objects can be overlaid on the real world.[4][5][6][7 What is Augmented reality what-is-augmented-reality_50290c719cb29_w587

 

Share
Posted in Education Technology, Future, Higher Education, Uncategorized, Web 2.0 , , , , , , , , , | No Comments »

Retention series; Professional Learning Communities

Written By: Cathy - Mar• 28•13

Learning Wordle

Please email me with ideas, thoughts, observations!  cathyandersonblog@gmail.com

I wanted to present here on what kind of professional development is most effective for faculty to learn new strategies to increase retention of students, it was that line of thought that brought me back around to a topic I posted a bit on a few months ago; professional learning communities.  I did a review of the literature to see if any research had been done on a possible link between institutions that have a structure of professional learning communities in place and student retention, I found some, but I would venture to guess that little research has been done in this area.  Much of the research focused on the benefits of Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) to K-12, however I believe they could be just as effective in colleges and universities, even though the research is sketchy in the application of PLCs to higher education.

 

I will start over again with professional learning communities and offer this overview.  Dufour (2004) speculated that the “title” of professional learning communities had become so watered down and applied to so many groups in education that it had really lost its definition and focus.  Dufour offered the following tenets of what a professional learning community does:  Ensure that students are learning. In order to achieve this aim he offers three critical questions that should drive the conversations of the PLC:  What do we want each student to learn, How will we know when each student has learned it, How will we respond when each student experiences difficulty in learning? The purpose of the PLC means that the instructor/teacher no longer addresses each student on his/her own, it is the school acting as a community to address student learning concerns, developing or improving programs and services to support the student, and monitoring the improvements and student progress.  (Dufour, R. What is a professional learning community? Educational Leadership, retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/may04/vol61/num08/What-Is-a-Professional-Learning-Community%C2%A2.aspx)

 

Dufour explains that a PLC creates a culture of collaboration.  It is this culture that breaks down silos, defines a common goal for achieving student success, and ensures a holistic view of the institution and how it operates.  The benefit of teachers working together to analyze each other’s practices, create a supportive environment focused on creating success for students and each other is powerful.  In fact as Fenn and Wells stated in their findings of a review of the literature that  “A core characteristic of the professional learning community is an undeviating focus on student learning (Louis & Kruse, 1995)” (p. 9). Teachers work collaboratively in PLCs to analyze student learning and work with students who are failing (DuFour & Eaker, 1998; Eaker, DuFour, & DuFour, 2002; Hord, 2004; Hord & Sommers, 2008; McLaughlin & Talbert, 2001, 2006). (Wells, C., Fenn, L. What has changed, a study of three years of professional learning Community Work. Planning and Change v. 39, No. 1., pp 42-66).  Ultimately the focus is on the results, the progress of students to successfully achieve their goals.  As Dufour states, “Working together to improve student achievement becomes the routine work of the school.”

 

Wells and Fenn sought to determine the efficacy of professional learning communities in each of the following domains:

• Supportive and shared leadership

• Collective creativity

• Shared values and vision

• Supportive conditions

• Shared personal practice

 

 

This study was based upon the following aim to  learn about the level of implementation of Professional Learning Community (PLC) principles at six high schools.   They found that the teachers identified strategies to develop student learning,t indicated the largest growth was in the area of collaboration, with teachers reporting that it was easier to collaborate with colleagues, and easier to approach and engage in a dialogue with each other as a result of the participation in the PLCs.

 

What the researchers learned was that teachers didn’t always believe the data and information regarding student progress stating that, by sharing information, planning, and working together. What they did not want to do, however, was to analyze student learning results and work to improve them, as indicated by this quote: “We rarely look at data and when we do, teachers often don’t buy it. There’s always a big disconnect. We don’t have a shared vision.”

 

The second study also revealed that teachers were not studying best educational practice or developing a shared knowledge base about student learning. So, while the strife settled down from the early days of implementation, the results of the survey interviews indicated that the teachers had settled into new behaviors of meeting together, but no other substantive change had occurred.

The irony of Fenn’s and Wells’ findings is that teachers were most resistant to the most often noted benefits of PLCs, mainly that:

 

• Intentionality of purpose—working in PLCs to improve teacher and student learning

• Collaboration—working in teams, instead of in isolation, for the purpose of analyzing student learning

Results-driven focus—reviewing outcomes as primary in importance over input of materials

• Action plans to interrupt failed learning

• Shared practice and collective inquiry—studying best educational practices

 

Ultimately the most often cited reason for the resistance was an issue of just not having the time to put into practice the tenets of PLCs, so it seems the experiences were very superficial.

 

 

However the following reasons were also cited:

 

• “Individual resistance.”

• “We discuss learning results overall but don’t have the time to review and disaggregate the data. The amount of time that it takes, it’s useless —forget it.”

• “Teachers are territorial. There’s a fear of comparison with each other.”

• “It’s a time issue. You get to the end of the unit and some didn’t do so well—what are you going to do now?”

• “Everyone has their own teaching techniques; there’s a divide in our department. Many are too bull-headed.”

• “We rarely talk about instruction.”

• “Teachers are always asking for more time to meet.”

• “It’s hit or miss.”

• “The veteran teachers are less likely to change.”

• “Not a lot of collaboration taking place.”

 

 

Ultimately though if administration does not define specific measurable outcomes from the application of PLCs, gather data and information, track results and provide that feedback to the teachers, it will be meaningless and seem to be time waster.   Providing a consistent loop of “Plan, do check and act” should be in place for the application and commitment to PLCs to have meaning and benefit.

 

In the January 2013 issue of the Community College Review, Jackson, Stebleton, and Laanan provide their findings in the article The experience of community college faculty involved in a learning community program. The study was based upon interview with 14 faculty members based upon their experiences in participating in PLCs on their campus.   Through this process four themes were identified:  Creating empathy and greater awareness,  building authentic student relationships, engaging in the larger campus community, promoting active collaboration and professional development with other faculty members.

 

 

The researchers concluded stating, “Faculty members can play a vital role in community colleges in helping to  engage and retain students. High-impact educational practices such as professional learning communities serve as one such tool to help students to meet academic, career and personal goals. ..”

 

 

 

Researchers, Jay R. Dee and Cheryl J. Daly state that, “Faculty development programs can play an important role on college and university campuses by acknowledging the human needs of faculty members, and by providing the resources, social networks, and innovative ideas that can foster the fulfillment of those needs.”   They define faculty development or professional development as, “Faculty development programs can be defined as organizationally supported initiatives designed to improve faculty performance or enhance the quality of faculty work life.”  Their findings strengthened the argument for PLCs stating that, :Faculty collaboration may be necessary to handle the rapid advances in instructional technology and in pedagogical  approaches. Moreover, this era represents another shift in emphasis from developing the individual faculty member to also strengthening the entire institution.”  ( Dee,J and Daly, C., (2009) Innovative Models for Organizing Faculty Development Programs Pedagogical Reflexivity, Student Learning Empathy, and Faculty Agency  HUMAN ARCHITECTURE: JOURNAL OF THE SOCIOLOGY OF SELF-KNOWLEDGE, VII, 1, WINTER 2009, 1-22)

 

 

I am going to revisit their comprehensive article for further insight in the future.  Ultimately some of what I believe they found includes an observation that the faculty networking, or in house professional development may prove more beneficial because it is a continuum not a  “one-shot’ deal.

Share
Posted in Collaboration, College Completion, College Retention, faculty development, Learner Centered, professional learning community, Retention, student success , , , , , , , , , , | No Comments »

Professional development and student retention

Written By: Cathy - Mar• 16•13

Judy McShannon and Patricia Hynes of New Mexico State University wrote about the retention program;  Gaining Retention and Achievement for Students Program, in their article Student Achievement and Retention: Can Professional Development Programs Help Faculty GRASP it?

The article abstract describes the program as follows:

 

This paper presents a unique faculty development program called GRASP (Gaining

Retention and Achievement for Students Program) developed at New Mexico State University. A fundamental assumption of GRASP is faculty are crucial to student retention and achievement,  hence the primary focus on faculty. GRASP focuses on incorporating faculty’s teaching behaviors which increase student retention and achievement. The program is composed of four interlaced components: assessment of student learning styles; faculty development to cultivate and implement appropriate teaching strategies; in-class observations and feedback of faculty and students’ classroom behavior; and assessment of the impact on student retention and achievement.


Some of their findings on best approaches to professional development for faculty included:

Get department and college support before recruiting faculty.

Provide continuous feedback.

Classroom observers should be staff instead of fellow faculty.

Provide information about the research.

Use students’ learning styles as a tool to help faculty make teaching changes.

Illustrate teaching strategies with examples in each faculty’s field.

Speak in the language of the faculty’s discipline.
.

Show student success.

Donnelly College established an action project addressing professional development for faculty with the following outcomes:

 

The College will have a clearly understandable program that (1) fosters an environment of faculty commitment to professional development; (2) helps ensure faculty are effective in the classroom with current knowledge and skills; (3) provides clear faculty professional development expectations; and (4) provides a clear understanding of the resources available to meet expectations.

 

Patricia L. Farrell states in the article  Investing in Staff for Student Retention that
Research on first-year programs and outside-the-classroom experiences points to the prominence of faculty for student retention.

She also identified that researchers noted three variables that impact retention:  Student variables are “inputs;” institutional variables, also inputs, include selectivity, size, institutional type and control, and gender and racial composition and environmental variables include  campus-based inputs and outcomes.

 

Micheal Herbert, in his article Staying the Course: A Study in Online Student Satisfaction and Retention  gave the following “concise” definitions of each below:

A review of the literature has shown that the variables most commonly cited as being important to retention can be grouped into three main categories. These categories as identified by Berge and Huang (2004) are:

 

  1. Personal variables . These include demographics that encompass age, gender, and martial status; as well as variables such as academic skills and abilities, motivation, commitment and locus of control (Rotter 1966, Parker 1999, Kember 1995).

  2. Institutional variables . This category includes variables such as academic, bureaucratic and institutional social variables (Willis 1994, Alexander, McKenzie, and Geissinger 1998).

  3. Circumstantial variables . These include socio-economic variables, academic interactions, social interactions and life situation.

 

Professional development integrates the role of faculty with retention, rather than making retention and instruction two different functions.   As Vincent Tinto stated in his article, “This is the case because the classroom is, for many students, the one place, perhaps only place,
where they meet each other and the faculty. If involvement does not occur there, it is unlikely to occur elsewhere.1

In specific regard to faculty development Tinto observes:

 

Regarding faculty and staff development, it is increasingly clear that faculty actions, especially in the classroom, are critical to institutional efforts to increase student retention, but it is also clear that the faculty of our universities and colleges are, as a matter of practice, the only faculty from kindergarten through universities who are literally not trained to teach their students. Yet we know little about the ways in which investments in differing types of faculty development programs

impact rates of student retention. Though we have begun to link faculty pedagogy to student retention and therefore by inference to the importance of faculty development, that linkage has yet to be fully explored and tested.3

 

Having a website portal is essential to providing faculty and staff with access to the professional development resources they need to better understand role in student retention here are, what I thought good examples:

 

Stanford

http://med.stanford.edu/smili/support/pedagogy.html

 

 

foothill

 

 

http://www.foothill.edu/staff/development/

 

 

 

 

National Center for Faculty Development and Diversity

 

Nationalcenterforfacultydevelopment

 

 

 

 

Colorado University:

 

colorado uni

Share
Posted in College Completion, College Retention, faculty development, Higher Education, Learner Centered, professional learning community, Retention, student success , , , , , , | No Comments »

More notes on retention in relation to course scheduling

Written By: Cathy - Mar• 15•13

It was my intent to write something insightful today about course scheduling, semester to semester, and how that can also impact student retention.  Continuous monitoring of course schedules, enrollments,  getting student and faculty feedback will all provide some insight into optimum or student centered course scheduling.   Of course I could provide some anecdotal evidence on how I have seen changes made in course scheduling can contribute to student retention as well as impact favorably on an institution’s bottom line. A search for innovations in course scheduling resulted in my finding the following:

Teaching and Learning; Applying the Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education , edited by Arthur W. Chickering and Zelda F. Gamson (Jossey-Bass, 1991).

·         Good Practice Encourages Student-Faculty Contact

Frequent student-faculty contact in and out of classes is the most important factor in student motivation and involvement. Faculty concern helps students get through rough times and keep on working. Knowing a few faculty members well enhances students ‘ intellectual commitment and encourages them to think about their own values and future plans.

 

·         Good Practice Encourages Cooperation Among Students

Learning is enhanced when it is more like a team effort than a solo race. Good learning, like good work, is collaborative and social, not competitive and isolated. Working with others often increases involvement in learning. Sharing one’s own ideas an d responding to others’ reactions improves thinking and deepens understanding.

 

·         Good Practice Encourages Active Learning

Learning is not a spectator sport. Students do not learn much just sitting in classes listening to teachers, memorizing pre-packaged assignments, and spitting out answers. They must talk about what they are learning, write about it, relate it to past experiences, and apply it to their daily lives. They must make what they learn part of themselves.

 

·         Good Practice Gives Prompt Feedback

Knowing what you know and don’t know focuses learning. Students need appropriate feedback on performance to benefit from courses. In getting started, students need help in assessing existing knowledge and competence. In classes, students need frequent opportunities to perform and receive suggestions for improvement. At various points during college, and at the end, students need chances to reflect on what they have learned, what they still need to know, and how to assess themselves.

 

·         Good Practice Emphasizes Time on Task

Time plus energy equals learning. There is no substitute for time on task. Learning to use one’s time well is critical for students and professionals alike. Students need help in learning effective time management. Allocating realistic amounts of time means effective learning for students and effective teaching for faculty. How an institution defines time expectations for students, faculty, administrators, and other professional staff can establish the basis for high performance for all.

·         Good Practice Communicates High Expectations

Expect more and you will get it. High expectations are important for everyone — for the poorly prepared, for those unwilling to exert themselves, and for the bright and well motivated. Expecting students to perform well becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy when teachers and institutions hold high expectations for themselves and make extra efforts.

 

·         Good Practice Respects Diverse Talents and Ways of Learning

There are many roads to learning. People bring different talents and styles of learning to college. Brilliant students in the seminar room may be all thumbs in the lab or art studio. Students rich in hands-on experience may not do so well with theory. Students need the opportunity to show their talents and learn in ways that work for them. Then they can be pushed to learning in new ways that do not come so easily.

Institutions may find that each term there are numerous classes scheduled that are cancelled, while other classes reach their capacity early on and are closed. The uncertainty caused to students by cancelled and closed classes creates a poor image for the institution to the students it serves.

Often, in the case of the cancelled classes,  high demand classes may be  closed too early, thereby missing their true window of opportunity. Other classes consistently fill to capacity at the beginning of the registration period signaling a need to increase that particular course offering.

The benefits of having a collaborative review of how the class schedule may help determine how to be more effective and efficient in course scheduling. This includes the following an  analysis of how decisions are made to limit sections, who makes those decisions and/or cancel classes.  An analysis, that includes members from academics, institutional effectiveness and student services to determine how to be more effective, efficient and student centered is essential.  This analysis has the potential to result in a reduction or better management of overhead costs,  more effectively meeting the demands of increased numbers of students, and a more responsive and efficient way of offering a schedule that meets student and community demands, resulting in greater student satisfaction and increased enrollment.

Implementing an improved class schedule will result in the following:

 

  1. Facilitates more reliable communication between faculty and staff about course offerings,
  2. Improves alignment between course schedule and college catalog,
  3. Minimizes waitlist activity,
  4. Improves utilization of classrooms and other College services,
  5. Expands offerings during underutilized time periods.
  6. reduce class scheduling conflicts and maximize efficient use of classrooms

 

Some of the anticipated outcomes of improving the course scheduling process may result in the following:

 

  • Class schedules will reflect address students’ needs; and optimize the capacity of the student to progress  toward degree completion in a timely fashion.
  • Required courses will be scheduled at times that do not conflict.
  • Class schedules will reflect a sound pedagogy and optimize student learning
  • Departments, such as General Education, that support other majors will coordinate schedules. Other Core courses will be scheduled throughout the day and evening based upon a time that best meets the demands of students.
  • To improve efficiencies if multiple sections of major courses are to be offered at the same day and time enrollments will be carefully monitored and sections combined if deemed more efficient.
  • Courses will be noted and justification required each semester
  • A list of scheduling best practices checklists and information should be developed and distributed to the academic departments.
  • Efficiency in classroom use should be a priority consideration when on-line or blended courses require limited use of classroom space.

 

  • Alternate calendar schedules and intersession classes between major semesters are
  • The impact of the revised class schedule (to be implemented in Fall 2008), including but
  • not limited to changes in student access to classes, student retention and progress, faculty
  • satisfaction, and instructional space utilization, will be continuously evaluated for improvement.
  • Class capacity/seats will be set at the maximum seat capacity to ensure that classroom use is optimized.  however there are exceptions which are granted for accreditation purposes, or sound pedagogical  reasons.
  • Course scheduling finalized by one office for accuracy.
Share
Posted in College Completino, College Completion, College Retention, continuous quality improvement, Uncategorized, University , , , , , , , , , | No Comments »

More notes on college retention planning

Written By: Cathy - Mar• 13•13

Learning Wordle

 

There are many reasons why institutions focus on retention. In addition to the call across the country and the presidential administration institutions recognize that it’s the right and ethical thing to do citing reasons such as:

By recognizing that many of the reasons students drop out can be reduced with some institutional programs and process changes and that their institution must look at more financially responsible ways to grow.  Some institutions, through new initiative to increase accountability, self-assessment and a better understanding of the data and information at hand recognize that retention is problem.  An inventory of their programs and services may bring to light that  few processes are developed and deployed to address the requirements of underprepared students and that we can improve many of the support processes that impact retention. Oftentimes, through this analysis of detailed data and information institutions recognize that they have making decisions based upon assumptions or anecdotal evidence.

 

The Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association requires that institutions implement action projects as part of the Academic Quality Improvement Program for accreditation some institutions make the development of a retention plan part of their AQIP process.  Lakeland College is one college that did so citing the following  rationale:

Our task is to create a retention plan that, when implemented, will improve student retention and degree attainment. College employees indicated a strong interest in student retention during Conversation Day and in a vote during Fall semester 2008. Faculty are aware that students do not always make steady progress toward their academic goals and often fail to complete courses even when earning satisfactory grades overall. Recognizing that community college students have significant risk factors, we believe that closer contact and communication with students will foster higher retention and success rates for Lakeland’s students.

 

Seward County Community College also identified the following:

Successfully implementing enrollment management requires collecting and analyzing data. The goal of this action project is to identify, review and analyze data on SCCC students to determine why SCCC has a low retention rate and to create a plan to address the needs of the students who are not retained. The plan will include student retention initiatives that will be monitored and reviewed by the SCCC

 

 

In 2007 Dr. Jeff Clark wrote the paper,  RETENTION: A Selected Critical Inventory of Best Practices,  this paper provides a solid overview of Retention presentations in higher education.

 

What I hope to present to you today is an overview of the common elements found in a student retention plan, based upon my experience and a review of several college’s plans and some direction to resources, such as Dr. Clark’s paper, that will assist your institution in retention planning.

 

Most plans provide an introduction. In the introduction, the institution provides the background information upon which the plan was developed.  This includes the history of the institution, the data and information upon which the plan was developed.

The introduction may also provide community information, which includes demographics information, background information on the demographics of the student body, and community support for the institution and the student.

 

This introduction may also provide information on how the retention plan was developed, some of these include:

 

  • review of literature and best practices related to student retention;
  • a self-study on the First-Year Experience at the college; retention consultant study to identify strengths
  • gaps in current retention policies, practices and activities;
  • review of current college retention data; survey of faculty and staff;
  • meeting and open forums with faculty, staff, deans and other administrative staff.

 

More often the retention plan moves past all of this information and addresses why the institution has the urgency to address retention, the steps taken to develop the plan, and the baseline numbers used to develop the plan.

Often university wide committees for retention and graduation are appointed to holistically address the concern of retention for the institution.

 

Also found in the executive summary or introduction is the charge given to the committees formed to address retention; this usually is something like from Cleveland State University’s plan:

 

This plan will focus on engaging students early by way of email communications, activities and advisement. It makes the assumption that all previously identified strategies in the Faculty

Committee on Student Success will continue to be supported by all respective stakeholders.

 

Many institutions recognize that the “first year experience” is crucial as is evident from this website and the support provided by the University of South Carolina.

 

nationalresourcecenterfye

 

 

 

This is the home of the National Resource Center on the First Year Experience, according to the website it  serves as the trusted expert, internationally recognized leader, and clearinghouse for scholarship, policy, and best practice for all postsecondary student transitions. The following statements of mission and core commitments provide a foundation for these activities and guide the Center’s efforts.

 

 

The United States Department of Education has established an online resource center of best practices in retention for higher education.

 

USDOE

 

As I noted earlier ACT provides information on a survey that they conduct of colleges on student retention.
2012 Reality of College Readiness Report This national report and the series of state reports trace the enrollment, retention, and transfer patterns of 2010 ACT-tested high school graduates.   In 2004 they reported the following: Primary findings from the study included the following.

 

  • Institutions were far more likely to attribute attrition to student characteristics than to institutional characteristics.
  • Respondents from all colleges in the study reported retention practices responsible for the greatest contribution to retention fell into three main categories.

1. First-year programs

2. Academic advising

3. Learning support

 

 

When asked to identify the three campus retention practices that had the greatest impact on student

retention, all survey respondents identified at least one of the following.

 

  • Freshman seminar/university 101 for credit
  • Tutoring program
  • Advising interventions with selected student populations
  • Mandated course placement testing program
  • Comprehensive learning assistance center/lab

 

 

 

After reviewing the data and information, the institution will establish those priority issues they intend to address in the retention plan.   Gather data and information, such as the provided via the ACT survey, will allow the institution to identify best practices and develop the strategies that will provide them with the means to address their specific retention priorities.

 

 

Priorities maybe similar to these developed by Mount Wachusett Community College:

 

Visibility and Teamwork

 

Priority 1.0: Retention, completion, and student success initiatives are prioritized within the  college community. Faculty, staff, and students value student success and are engaged in a

continuous process of data-informed improvement to meet shared goals.

 

Learning-Centered Policies and Practices

 

Priority 2.0: Revise and/or create learning-centered policies, which align with institutional goals of student success and goal/degree completion.

 

Targeted Interventions

 

Priority 3.0: Existing resources will be strategically deployed using a data-informed decision making process, and in the absence of resources in the face of student need, new interventions to support students will be developed.

 

Motivational Communications

 

Priority 4.0: Intentional communications with students maintain and support continuous enrollment and student success.

 

Curriculum and Instruction

 

Priority 5.0 Faculty will redesign curriculum and instruction to integrate Active Learning Strategies and Student Success Skills to engage students in the learning process and improve

student retention.

After establishing the priorities institutions may capture them, the steps taken to implement them and the outcomes.  It is critical that these initiatives are captured, much in the same way that the North Carolina Community College System captured them in the comprehensive,  Retention Best Practices A collection of best practices from North Carolina Community Colleges.

 

 

 

As part of their strategic initiatives many institutions are creating positions that have a specific focus on retention, usually these positions are directly titled as “retention specialists, retention coordinators, or student success coordinate.”  Regardless the term “retention” is becoming  more and more common in job descriptions for higher education, a search of the HigherEdJobs data base using retention as   search term pulls more than 1000 jobs from vice presidents to coordinators.

 

Specific duties include:

 

 

Student Success Coordinator at Galen College of Nursing:

 

Provide academic support services, community resource referrals and other related services to support student retention and success in the nursing programs. Assist Galen’s faculty and staff in understanding the diverse academic, socioeconomic, cultural and ethnic backgrounds of the students.

 

Advisor/Recruiter- Immigration Advising & Retention Specialist at Eastern Washington University:

 

Retention Specialist at Montclair State University:   STATEMENT OF PURPOSE:
Under the direction of the Director of the Academic Success and Retention Programs (ASRP) Office, the Retention Specialist is responsible for providing academic counseling, major exploration activities and support services to numerous upperclassmen student cohorts, and monitoring progress toward degree completion. The Retention Specialist works with the director and other staff of the ASRP office to develop and deliver University-wide upperclassmen and transfer student success programming. In order to provide students with needed support services, the Retention Specialist will facilitate strong working relationships, fostering partnerships with academic departments within the Schools and College, and other University administrative offices. The Retention Specialist stays current on trends in the areas of academic advising, student retention, graduation rates and student services.

 

Retention specialist Lehigh University:

 

Develop and implement retention programs

  • Develop new outreach opportunities.
  • Follow up with enrolled students using existing office strategies.
  • Promote student success through improved processes and individual customer service and support.
  • Develop and maintain working relationships with COE department coordinators to provide academic program advising to enhance retention initiatives.

 

Learning disability specialist at Northeastern University:  Staff of the Learning Disabilities Program (LDP) is charged with the goal to increase the achievement and retention of NU students with learning disabilities and attention deficit disorders.

 

 

Seattle Community College recognizes the issues associated with planning for student retention, developing programs that addresses the student needs, the whole student.  Some of these programs include funding, child care,  and other services.  One critical service, is that of emergency grants:

 

The Emergency Grant Programs at the three colleges are designed to provide students with financial assistance in case of emergencies that put their academic success at risk. The programs serve students who have suffered personal property loss, emergency medical needs and other unforeseen emergency expenses. At each of the colleges, advisors and counselors report that emergency grant support is among their highest resource priorities.

 

 

After benchmarking where the institution is at establishing measurable goals will ensure that the college is measuring its progress.  Fairmont State University and Fairmont State Community & Technical College establishing the following goals in their plan:

 

Goal 1  Increase by 3 percent the retention rate of ñrst-tíme, fulHime associate and baccalaureate degree seeking students using the Fall 2003 cohort.

Goal 2  Increase the three- and six year graduation rates by 3 percent for first-time, full time associate and baccalaureate degree-seeking students using the fail 2003 cohort.

Goal 3 – Increase the retention rate of undeclared and provisional students by 3 percent  for the fall 2003 cohort.

Goal 4 -Increase the retention rate of developmental education students by 3 percent for the fall 2003 cohort.

Goal 5 – Increase the retention rate by 3 percent of off-campus students using the fall  2003 cohort.

Goal 6 -Increase the retention rate by 3 percent of special populations using the fall 2003 cohort.

 

Fairmont state also recognizes the importance of systematic review of the retention plan:

 

This plan is the beginning of the Fairmont State’s comprehensive retention plan. lt is a dynamic and constantly changing plan that will be reviewed annually by the Director of Retention, Retention Committee, and Presidents Cabinet. Strategies and action plans  will be assessed and those that are not effective will be replaced.

 

 

 

 

 

Share
Posted in College Completion, College Retention, Retention, Strategic planning , , , , , , , | No Comments »

College Completion and Retention Notes of the Day

Written By: Cathy - Mar• 11•13

Learning Wordle

 

 

Why is getting a college education so important, therefore retention so successful degree attainment, because as Anthony Carnevale projects (via the Georgetown University Workforce Development Center):

Between 2008 and 2018, the economy will create 47 million jobs: 14 million new jobs and 33 million job openings to replace retiring baby boomers. Job openings that require at least some
postsecondary education or training will make up 64 percent of all job openings and will include
most long-term career jobs (Carnevale, Smith, and Strohl 2010). We project a cumulative increase of
• 5 million more job openings for people with master’s degrees or better,
• 11 million more job openings for people with bachelor’s degrees,
• 14 million job openings for people with some college or associate degrees,
• 17 million job openings for people with high school educations or less, and
• 15 million jobs for people with postsecondary certificates

It is short sighted to develop a retention plan around activities that you conduct with and for current students.  Retention beings before a student becomes a student with at your college or university.  These activities start with relationship building with K-12 to collaborate on developing programs and services that are designed to promote college  awareness and college preparedness.

This can be achieved through collaboration with K-12 to make sure our respective curriculum are aligned to produce high quality workforce credentials, certificates and degrees.

Furthermore Carnevale asserts, “that the aversion to integrating CTE programs into the secondary and post-secondary system is an opportunity lost. These programs keep students in high school and move them on to post-secondary education more effectively than college preparation does. They provide an alternative applied pedagogy for those who have not done well in academic curriculum.?

I agree with Careneval’s assertion, primarily because CTE provides a reality of what it actually means to be in a certain career.  By participating in the applied classroom or lab experience the student may actually be taught by career professionals from a certain career.

Career academies provide just such an opportunity.  According to the Career Academic website “career academies were first developed some 35 years ago with the aim of restructuring large high schools into small learning communities and creating better pathways between high school and further education and the workplace.”

According to the report; Career Academies Long-Term Impacts on Labor Market Outcomes,
Educational Attainment, and Transitions to Adulthood  MDRC found. Career Academies are defined by three distinguishing features: (1) they are organized as small learning communities to create a more supportive,  personalized learning environment; (2) they combine academic and career and technical curricula around a career theme to enrich teaching and learning; and (3) they establish partnerships with local employers to provide career awareness and work-based learning opportunities for students.

Partnerships between K-12 and Universities should result in some practices that are demonstrated to improve college preparedness.  It has been proven that the more college ready a student is the more likely he/she is to persist.  Some of those practices I have found on the web include:

From the career college website, “the AASCU report says college-readiness programs should be a priority on all campuses and include”:

  1. Strong teacher-preparation programs;
  2. Alignment between P-12 and post-secondary curricula;
  3. Timely and useful feedback to high schools regarding the performance of their graduates; and
  4. Availability of dual-credit programs and strategies to expand public-policy support to take this work to scale.

 

In addition to President Obama encouraging college completion many states are beginning to recognize the importance of college completion and are making it a part of their strategic direction.  An example of this is a statement from Georgia’s Complete College; Georgia’s Higher Education Completion Plan 2012.  One of the noted strategic priorities is for, “Expansion of the direct from high-school population through an improvement in college readiness and an overall increase in the high school graduation rate • Improvement in overall college completion rates and especially populations with historically low rates.”

In 2004 WestEd issued a policy brief that noted some ways in which K-12 and colllege could integrate and better prepare students for college.  Their strategies fell under two broader categories:

The strategies include:

 

  • Students take college placement tests for diagnostic purposes in middle school and early high school.

 

  • Performance on high school exams relates to college admission or placement decisions.

 

  • Colleges share freshmen performance information with high school

 

  • Faculties cross systems. When post-secondary professors work part-time in high schools and K–12 teachers also serve as teacher education faculty, teamwork blossoms

 

This report recommends that states plan as an “education system,” A K–16 plan provides a road-map for crafting silo-bridging policies (e.g., funding allocations that reward cross-system teacher preparation programs.)

Develop K–16 data systems. To get vital information about how their students fare in each segment, institutions need — and states generally lack — a cross-segment achievement data system.

Make no-stakes diagnostic testing part of the state testing program.

 

Share
Posted in College Completion, College Retention, student success , , , , , , , | No Comments »

More notes on college completion and retention

Written By: Cathy - Mar• 10•13

tLearning Wordle

 

What have institutions done to address retention?  What are the action plans, activities and tasks assigned to improve retention.  I have conducted a review of several retention plans and I will identify the common tasks or activities they have identified.

I n 2010 the American Association of Community College Commission and Board of Directors put forth The Completion Agenda: A Call to Action

 

Commitment and How to Get It

 

Key Points

Responsibility for completion is shared throughout the institution and the community.

•        Completion must be embedded into the fabric of the institution: Relationships. Rigor. Relevance.

•        Students want to be engaged and involved in the completion agenda; they want the data.

•        We have a responsibility to increase completion rates, and we have a legacy to create.

•        Completion should be made a part of the institution’s strategic plan.

•        States that have the best policy framework achieve the best completion rates.

•        The community needs to be engaged with the framework.

•        The completion agenda must be transparent and data driven.

•        Community colleges must encourage the completion of certificates, degrees, etc. (which are valuable to your community, to your students, to business and industry).

•        We need to communicate clearly what completion means.

Tinto, a leader in studying student retention identified the following:   (1993) three principles: 1) Institutions are committed to the students they serve. The welfare of the student is primary, 2) Individuals at the institution are committed to the education of all students (not just some), and 3) Individuals at the institution are committed to the development of supportive social and academic communities in which all students are integrated as full members.

 

In 2007 the Massachusetts did an in depth review of the research and trends around the subject of student retention and found tht the following were factors:

 

  • More than 60 percent of first-time, full-time, degree-seeking students enrolling in community colleges are not college ready and require developmental coursework. These students have lower graduation rates than college ready students.

 

  • Early completion of developmental coursework is essential for successful retention and graduation.

 

  • There are significant achievement gaps among groups of students based on income level, ethnicity, and gender.

 

  • The three-year graduation rate for first-time, full-time, degree-seeking students who complete a degree at the initial institution in which they enrolled (IPEDS) is one important measure of student success. Exclusive use of this measure obscures the unique mission of community colleges and does not include two thirds of Massachusetts community college students.

 

  • The Massachusetts community college student retention rate is comparable to the national average.

 

  • There is incomplete data on and assessment of the effectiveness of existing programs and services available to help students succeed.

 

 

Institutions need to create a culture of “student success,” as part of their focus on retention planning.  The retention plan should be part of an institution wide focus and should be communicated institution wide.

 

Hallberg, Hallberg, and Sauer established a program  called Student Success Central, have isolated eight factors they have found to be essential to success in college. They are:

• Responsibility vs. control – first year students believe their instructors have morecontrol over their performance, while upper classmen increasingly accept responsibility for their own success. Students perceive themselves as more in control when they are involved.

• Competition – the competitive student, defined as academically prepared and assertive, is more likely to persist to graduation based on his/her commitment to the goal of college competition and his/her commitment to the institution.

• Task Precision – expecting to do well at class projects or tasks is directly related to persistence within the institution.

• Expectations – successful students set their own goals and expectations, seek and discover new and challenging experiences in college, and adopt a relative posture towards knowledge development.

• Wellness – increasing awareness that psychological factors impact student success have led to campaigns to inform students about the detrimental effects of stress, sleeplessness, poor nutrition, depression, and high levels of anxiety.

• Time Management – Planning ahead and determining time constraints in completing assignments is critical to success in college.

• College Involvement – the strong correlation between college involvement and student success is evidenced in residence life, campus jobs, friendships and informal peer interactions, extra-curricular activities, and faculty interaction – these elements of campus life provide important social rewards that become part of a student’s generalized evaluation of the costs and benefits of college attendance.

Family Involvement – encouragement and/or participation of one’s family in the college experience is an important factor in success in college.

The following are terms common to retention planning:

 

Retention vs. Persistence – Retention refers to the institution’s rate of moving students through the system, while persistence refers to the student’s rate of progression. Students persist; institutions retain.

 

Attrition refers to the rate at which students leave college or drop out. Attrition rates are the opposite of retention rates.

 

Stop-Out vs. Dropout – Dropping out refers to permanent departure from an institution. Stopping out refers to temporary departure. Students who stop out may appear to be dropping out, but some-times return to the original institution after a period of time.

Short-term retention rates are typically measured from one term to the next (e.g., from fall to spring semester). Some institutions also label retention from one fall term to the next fall term as short-term.

Long-term retention rates typically measure student persistence across multiple terms. Long-term retention, for example, might include measuring student persistence from initial entry to the institution through graduation.

Graduation rates are the proportion of students who graduate in a given period of time. The federal Student Right-to-Know legislation asks community colleges to identify how many entering students receive an associate’s degree in three years, while a six-year time frame for earning a bachelor’s degree is specified for four-year institutions.

 

Goals need to be established that will define what the retention plan will achieve or do.

 

Some of the strategies or tactics identified from various plans:

These are from

Priority 1: Expand interactions with area high schools and develop strategies to increase enrollment

Priority 2: Expand interaction with communities within service area, and create strategies to increase enrollment of adult students

Priority 3: Enhance marketing strategies via web, print, radio, and TV

Priority 4: Attract more students from underrepresented populations to enhance diversity in the student population

Priority 5: Use financial aid/scholarships as a tool to increase enrollment

Priority 6: Develop strategies which focus on student success and retention

Priority 7: Develop comprehensive enrollment data tracking

 

Faculty play a pivotal role in retention:

Task Description:

Faculty will be encouraged to develop effective retention strategies and implement them in their classrooms during 2009-2010.  Faculty will also be asked to attend workshops dealing with improving student retention.

 

From Portland Community College

Faculty…interested in ways you can promote student retention?

  • Use MyPCC. MyPCC is an online community for PCC students, faculty, and staff. It provides access to email, registration, course tools, college announcements and all aspects of college business.my.pcc.edu
  • Refer students to Panther Tracks online. This website gives students all the information they need to succeed at PCC. Campus resources, checklists, important deadlines, study tips, degree options, the list goes on! www.pcc.edu/panthertracks
  • Introduce your students to MAP. Found on the MyPCC My Courses tab, MAP is an online academic planning tool with self assessments, worksheets, and career and academic resources. MAP was developed in collaboration with Oregon Career Information System.http://www.pcc.edu/resources/academic/retention/StudentRetention.html
  • Use Course Progress Notification (CPN). Through the 2007 Noel-Levitz survey, PCC students stated that faculty providing timely feedback about course progress was of high importance, but that faculty did not do so regularly or to their satisfaction. Faculty can use CPN to communicate with students about attendance, class participation, completed coursework, current grades, and overall performance. http://www.pcc.edu/resources/academic/retention/CPN.html
  • Encourage students to use GRAD Plan. GRAD Plan is available for all students and advisors to assess degree progress and remaining academic requirements. Students can consider different degrees and certificates, find the classes they need graduate, and create an academic plan with an advisor. Students can access their GRAD Plan from the MyPCC My Courses tab.http://www.pcc.edu/resources/advising/grad-plan
  • Employ a few of the 110 Teaching Tips. Learn all your students names, have students evaluate the course regularly, let students test each other, have a colleague critique your class…all of these and more can be found at http://www.pcc.edu/resources/academic/retention/TeachingTips.html

portlandretentionpanthtracks

 

From:  Eastern Connecticut State University “Student Success” Strategic Plan’s Initiative Proposal for Enhancing Student Retention and Timely Progress to Graduation:

 

Goals:  I. Goal:

 

To identify Academic Affairs and Student Affairs division policies and practices that promote or hinder timely progress to graduation, and then to develop an organizational structure for data collection and data review which will lead to increases in 4- and 6-year graduation rates

Phased in implementation plan

Assessment of effectiveness of the plan  and anticipated outcomes

 

College Forward program  is a comprehensive college access and retention program located in Austin, Texas, that serves low-income and first-generation college students.

The program provides some of the following college persistence services:

This includes:

  • Support Services:
    - Annual support with FAFSA
    - Help finding and completing scholarship applications
    - Transfer assistance
    - Referrals to appropriate college services, as needed
  • Regular Mailings:
    -Care packages during finals
    -Exclusive Collegian Newsletters every 2 months
  • College Reunions and Events:
    - December Reunion
    - July Reunion
    - End of School Year Collegian Dinner

And

  • Orientation to the college experience
  • Preparation for college entrance examinations
  • Assistance with college applications
  • Assistance securing financial aid
  • College persistence support

 

Seattle Community College System has launched a campaign for retention called Power and Promise:

The initiiatives include the following:

  • Increasing assistance with “barrier” courses, especially math and English
  • Offering peer assistance and mentoring to new students
  • Building strong student cohorts and engaging students in group learning
  • Providing free access to tutoring centers
  • Creating customized programs for students of color
  • Offering new student orientations that address stress, time-management and effective study-skills
  • Using technology to track academic progress so that intensive advising can be offered when needed
  • Making emergency loans and grants available

seattlecommuntycollege

Share
Posted in College Completion, College Retention, Higher Education, Learner Centered, professional learning community, Retention, student success , , , , , , , , , | No Comments »

Email me!

Written By: Cathy - Mar• 09•13

Please feel free to email me on anything..do you disagree? Suggestions ? thoughts?

cathyandersonblog@gmail.com ..

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
12345>>